Abstract:Objective People in disadvantaged areas are more likely to have an avoidable emergency hospital admission. Socio-economic inequality in avoidable emergency hospital admissions is monitored in England. Our aim was to inform local health care purchasing and planning by identifying recent health care system changes (or other factors), as reported by local health system leaders, that might explain narrowing or widening trends. Methods Case studies were undertaken in one pilot and at five geographically distinct local health care systems (Clinical Commissioning Groups, CCGs), identified as having consistently increasing or decreasing inequality. Local settings were explored through discussions with CCG officials and stakeholders to identify potential local determinants. Data were analysed using a realist evaluation approach to generate context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. Results Of the five geographically distinct CCGs, two had narrowing inequality, two widening, and one narrowing inequality, which widened during the project. None of the CCGs had designed a large-scale package of service changes with the explicit aim of reducing socio-economic inequality in avoidable emergency admissions, and local decision makers were unfamiliar with their own trends. Potential primary and community care determinants included: workforce, case finding and exclusion, proactive care co-ordination for patients with complex needs, and access and quality. Potential commissioning determinants included: data use and incentives, and targeting of services. Other potential determinants included changes in care home services, national A&E targets, and wider issues - such as public services financial constraints, residential gentrification, and health care expectations. Conclusions We did not find any bespoke initiatives that explained the inequality trends. The trends were more likely due to an interplay of multiple health care and wider system factors. Local decision makers need greater awareness, understanding and support to interpret, use and act upon inequality indicators. They are unlikely to find simple, cheap interventions to reduce inequalities in avoidable emergency admissions. Rather, long-term multifaceted interventions are required that embed inequality considerations into mainstream decision making.

Tackling poverty should have equal priority with lowering waiting lists, says King's Fund

Austerity policies: levelling down?

The health costs of political failure

UK shows what not to do to tackle health inequalities, says Marmot

Poverty proofing healthcare: A qualitative study of barriers to accessing healthcare for low-income families with children in northern England

Charities step in to tackle digital divide, amid concerns over health inequalities

Obesity: time for NHS England to step up

Public health is in crisis, but it can be fixed

Hospitals serving England's most deprived patients generate proportionally less private income, study shows

The medicalisation of health inequalities and the English NHS: the role of resource allocation

GP funding model should change to deliver population health, says think tank

NHS charities help with more than just the trimmings

The ethics and politics of addressing health inequalities

More for less: best patient outcomes in a time of financial restraint

Declaring a health and care emergency

Health and health system effects on poverty: A narrative review of global evidence

Reducing inequality in avoidable emergency admissions: Case studies of local health care systems in England using a realist approach

Bridging the gap between health care and no care: the homelessness crisis

Avoidable Deaths: Poorest People Continue to Have the Greatest Risk in England and Wales

Poverty and population health - The need for A Paradigm shift to capture the working poor and better inform public health planning

Implications of child poverty reduction targets for public health and health inequalities in England: a modelling study between 2024 and 2033