Construction and Validation of a Predictive Model for Long-Term Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Peng Yang,Jieying Duan,Mingxuan Li,Rui Tan,Yuan Li,Zeqing Zhang,Ying Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s486839
IF: 3.829
2024-11-28
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Abstract:Peng Yang, 1 Jieying Duan, 2, 3 Mingxuan Li, 2, 3 Rui Tan, 1 Yuan Li, 1 Zeqing Zhang, 4 Ying Wang 1 1 Department of Geriatric Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China; 3 Department of Cardiology, Chest Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China; 4 Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Ying Wang; Zeqing Zhang, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Eastern Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 13939019726 ; +86 18339967695, Email ; Purpose: Current scoring systems used to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) lack some key components and their predictive ability needs improvement. This study aimed to develop a more effective scoring system for predicting 3-year MACE in patients with AMI. Patients and Methods: Our statistical analyses included data for 461 patients with AMI. Eighty percent of patients (n=369) were randomly assigned to the training set and the remaining patients (n=92) to the validation set. Independent risk factors for MACE were identified in univariate and multifactorial logistic regression analyses. A nomogram was used to create the scoring system, the predictive ability of which was assessed using calibration curve, decision curve analysis, receiver-operating characteristic curve, and survival analysis. Results: The nomogram model included the following seven variables: age, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, Killip class, chronic kidney disease, lipoprotein(a), and percutaneous coronary intervention during hospitalization. The predicted and observed values for the nomogram model were in good agreement based on the calibration curves. Decision curve analysis showed that the clinical nomogram model had good predictive ability. The area under the curve (AUC) for the scoring system was 0.775 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.728– 0.823) in the training set and 0.789 (95% CI 0.693– 0.886) in the validation set. Risk stratification based on the scoring system found that the risk of MACE was 4.51-fold higher (95% CI 3.24– 6.28) in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. Notably, this scoring system demonstrated better predictive ability than the GRACE risk score (AUC 0.776 vs 0.731; P =0.007). Conclusion: The scoring system developed from the nomogram in this study showed favorable performance in prediction of MACE and risk stratification of patients with AMI. Keywords: acute myocardial infarction, long-term outcome, MACE, nomogram, risk prediction model Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most serious type of coronary artery disease (CAD) with high rates of death and disability. Even among survivors, the probability of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) is substantially higher after AMI than before this event. 1,2 Furthermore, the prognosis of AMI patients varies widely depending on their clinical presentation, age, cardiovascular risk factors, and comorbidities. 3 Therefore, there is a need for a validated tool that can predict the long-term prognosis of these patients. The guidelines suggest that patients with AMI should be risk-stratified using the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) and TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) risk scores. 4 However, these scores were developed to assist clinicians in formulating rapid medical strategies and predicting the short-term risks of reinfarction and death based on the clinical information obtained in the emergency room. 5–7 Therefore, in terms of predicting the longer-term prognosis, these scoring systems overlook several significant factors. The management of patients with AMI has significantly improved over the past 20 years. As a result, the risk factors for MACE have evolved, along with changes in the strength of their associations with these outcomes. 1,8 Therefore, there is a pressing need to update the variables included in the scoring systems that are used to predict out-of-hospital MACE in patients with AMI. Furthermore, the long-term prognosis of these patients goes beyond the risks of reinfarction and death, given that the risks of stroke and heart failure are also substantially elevated in this population 3 and impose a serious burden that should not be ignored in lifelong out-of-ho -Abstract Truncated-
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology