Associations between fetal position at delivery and duration of active phase of labor: A historical cohort study

Birgitte Eide,Ragnar Kvie Sande,Phillip Von Brandis,Jørg Kessler,Christian Tappert,Torbjørn Moe Eggebø
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14929
2024-07-26
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Abstract:One‐minus survival plots showing the probability for delivery of fetus if in occiput posterior (OP) versus occiput anterior (OA) position during the active phase of labor for Robson ten‐group classification system group 1 and 2a (nulliparous women). The red line represents OP deliveries, and the blue line represents OA deliveries. Introduction In clinical experience, occiput posterior (OP) position is associated with longer labor duration than occiput anterior (OA) position, but few studies have investigated the association between labor duration and fetal position. We aimed to compare duration of the active phase of labor in OP deliveries with OA deliveries in a contemporary population using survival methods. Secondary aims were to compare the frequencies of operative interventions, obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), postpartum hemorrhage, and newborn outcomes in OP with OA deliveries. Material and Methods We did a historical cohort study in three university hospitals in Norway from 2012 to 2022. Women with a single fetus in cephalic presentation, no previous cesarean section and gestational age ≥37 weeks were eligible and stratified into the first four groups of the Robson ten‐group classification system (TGCS). We estimated the mean duration and calculated the hazard ratio (HR) for delivery using survival analyses. Cesarean sections and instrumental vaginal deliveries were censored. Results The study population comprised 112 019 women, 105 571 (94.2%) were delivered in OA and 6448 (5.8%) in OP position. The estimated mean duration of the active phase of labor was longer in women with the fetus in OP position in all four TGCS groups. The estimated duration was longer in the OP groups in analyses stratified with respect to epidural analgesia and oxytocin augmentation. The graphical abstract illustrates the probability of delivery in OP compared with OA position in merged TGCS groups 1 and 2a, as a function of time. The unadjusted HR was 0.33 (95% CI 0.31–0.36) for fetuses delivered in OP position compared with OA position in TGCS group 1, 0.25 (95% CI 0.21–0.27) in group 2a, 0.70 (95% CI 0.67–0.73) in group 3, and 0.61 (95% CI 0.55–0.67) in group 4a, respectively. Neither maternal age, gestational age, BMI nor birthweight had confounding effect. Operative delivery rates and OASIS rates were higher in OP position in all four groups. Conclusions We found longer duration of the active phase of labor in women with the fetus delivered in OP position in all four TGCS groups.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?