Abstract:Background There is limited research on how patients fare when they are transferred from one acute care center to another acute care facility for further management. Purpose In this study, we explore the short-term, in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery who were transferred to acute care hospitals from other acute care centers. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study comparing adult patients who were transferred to the hospital from other acute centers with non-transferred hospital admissions between 2016 to 2018. We queried the National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients admitted with a principal procedural diagnosis of CABG. We analyzed the categorical and continuous variables by Pearson's chi-squared and Student t-test respectively. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for age, gender, hospital bed size, hospital location and comorbidities, was used to compare mortality. The comorbidities adjusted for included atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, hypertension, obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Results 379,195 patients met our inclusion criteria. CABG patients transferred from acute care centers had 1.34 times higher odds of suffering in-hospital mortality compared to regular hospital admissions (aOR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.17–1.52; p<0.001). When separated by race, acute care transfers had higher mortality rates amongst White patients (2.2% vs 1.4%, p<0.001, Figure 1) as well as longer hospital stays (10.9 vs 8.8 days, p<0.001, Table 1). Acute care transfers consisted of more female patients, had higher average APR-DRG mortality scores and lower median household income (Table 1). These patients also had higher rates of comorbidities such as congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease, but decreased rates of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, obesity, prior myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes mellitus (Table 1). In terms of operative complications, acute care transfers were more likely to have intraoperative cardiac arrest (0.2% vs 0.1%, p<0.001) and postoperative cardiac insufficiency (0.2% vs 0.1%, p<0.001, Table 1). There was no significant difference between our two cohorts in postoperative complications such as cardiac arrest, intracerebral infarction or heart failure. Conclusion Patients who were transferred to acute care hospitals from other acute care centers to undergo CABG had higher odds of suffering in-hospital mortality compared to regular hospital admissions. These patients were also at increased risk of intraoperative cardiac arrest and postoperative cardiac insufficiency. Our findings illustrate that acute care transfers undergoing CABG require additional medical support in the operative and postoperative setting. While additional studies are required to better understand this relationship, this study highlights the need for innovative clinical change to address these differences moving forward. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Training in Advanced Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the United Kingdom

Short-term and Long-term Postoperative Safety of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials.

Trainees operating on high-risk patients without cardiopulmonary bypass: a high-risk strategy?

Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a training course for novices and its learning curve.

First 100 cases of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Experience from a training cardiac surgeon

Comparative effects of off-pump and multiple cardiopulmonary bypass strategies in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Long Term Outcomes of The Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting In A High-Volume Center

Trends in coronary artery bypass surgery results: a recent, 9-year study

Two Decades of CABG in the UK: A Propensity Matched Analysis of Outcomes by Conduit Choice

Outcome differences between surgeons performing first and subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting procedures in a day: a retrospective comparative cohort study

On-pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in High-Risk Patients.

Effect of on-pump vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with non-dialysis-dependent severe renal impairment: propensity-matched analysis from the UK registry dataset

Quality Control in a Training Course of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.

Impact of transfer status on coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcomes

Is Single LIMA-LAD Bypass Appropriate for OPCAB Training?

Trends and outcomes for cardiac surgery in the United Kingdom from 2002 to 2016

CABG Case Volume and Patient Outcomes at the Veterans Healthcare Administration: On-Pump versus Off-Pump

[Results and Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: 2 831 Cases from a Single Center].

Trends in Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized Young Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the United States, 2004 to 2018

Jiangsu Province Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Registry Study: a Report of 4 661 Patients in 13 Centers

The outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in 209 cases