Effects of Different Types of Intermittent Fasting Interventions on Metabolic Health in Healthy Individuals (EDIF): A Randomised Trial with a Controlled-Run in Phase

Daniel Herz,Sebastian Karl,Johannes Weiß,Paul Zimmermann,Sandra Haupt,Rebecca Tanja Zimmer,Janis Schierbauer,Nadine Bianca Wachsmuth,Maximilian Paul Erlmann,Tobias Niedrist,Kayvan Khoramipour,Thomas Voit,Sian Rilstone,Harald Sourij,Othmar Moser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16081114
IF: 5.9
2024-04-10
Nutrients
Abstract:The effects of intermittent fasting (IF) on health promotion in the healthy population remain controversial. Therefore, our study aimed to analyse the efficacy and feasibility of different IF protocols and evaluated the effects within a cohort with a controlled-run in phase on the body mass index (BMI) as the primary outcome, the body composition, and metabolic and haematological markers in healthy participants. A total of 25 individuals were randomised into three fasting groups: 16/8 fasting (n = 11), 20/4 fasting (n = 6), and alternate-day fasting (ADF, n = 8). Assessments were conducted at baseline (visit 1), after a four-week controlled-run in phase (visit 2), and after eight weeks of fasting (visit 3). Both the BMI (p = 0.01) and bodyweight (p = 0.01) were significantly reduced in the ADF group, which was not seen in the 16/8 and 20/4 groups (p > 0.05). Adherence was different but not statistically among the groups (16/8: 84.5 ± 23.0%; 20/4: 92.7 ± 9.5%; and ADF: 78.1 ± 33.5%, p = 0.57). Based on our obtained results, the data suggest that some fasting interventions might be promising for metabolic health. However, adherence to the specific fasting protocols remains challenging even for the healthy population.
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the impact of different types of Intermittent Fasting (IF) interventions on the metabolic health of healthy individuals. The main objective of the study is to analyze the effectiveness and feasibility of three different intermittent fasting protocols (16/8 fasting, 20/4 fasting, and Alternate Day Fasting (ADF)) and to assess their effects on Body Mass Index (BMI), body composition, and metabolic and hematological markers. Specifically, the study employed a randomized controlled trial method, randomly assigning 25 healthy participants into three fasting groups: 16/8 fasting group (11 people), 20/4 fasting group (6 people), and ADF group (8 people). The study included a 4-week control period followed by an 8-week fasting intervention period. The primary outcome measure was the change in BMI. The results indicated a significant reduction in BMI in the ADF group (p=0.01), while no similar significant changes were observed in the 16/8 fasting group and the 20/4 fasting group (p>0.05). Additionally, the ADF group also showed a significant reduction in body weight (p=0.01). Among the three fasting groups, the adherence to the fasting protocols varied, but the differences were not statistically significant (16/8 fasting group: 84.5%±23.0%, 20/4 fasting group: 92.7%±9.5%, ADF group: 78.1%±33.5%, p=0.57). In summary, the study aims to address whether different types of intermittent fasting interventions can effectively improve the metabolic health of healthy individuals, with a particular focus on changes in BMI and other related physiological markers. The results suggest that ADF may have some potential in promoting metabolic health, but there are still challenges in implementing specific fasting protocols.