Quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties for dose accumulation on head and neck cancer proton treatments

Florian Amstutz,Peter G D’Almeida,Xin Wu,Francesca Albertini,Barbara Bachtiary,Damien C Weber,Jan Unkelbach,Antony J. Lomax,Ye Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103386
IF: 3.119
2024-05-29
Physica Medica
Abstract:Highlights: • Substantial differences in warped doses when applying multiple DIRs. • Pronounced uncertainties in high dose gradient regions. • Contralateral parotid: up to 33 % max dose uncertainty, 54 % of voxels uncertainty >5 %. • DDA uncertainty estimation proposed for lung works even better for HNC. • Over 92 % of the voxels predicted within ±5 % to the reference dose uncertainty. Purpose Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients in radiotherapy require adaptive treatment plans due to anatomical changes. Deformable image registration (DIR) is used in adaptive radiotherapy, e.g. for deformable dose accumulation (DDA). However, DIR's ill-posedness necessitates addressing uncertainties, often overlooked in clinical implementations. DIR's further clinical implementation is hindered by missing quantitative commissioning and quality assurance tools. This study evaluates one pathway for more quantitative DDA uncertainties. Methods For five HNC patients, each with multiple repeated CTs acquired during treatment, a simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) plan was optimized. Recalculated doses were warped individually using multiple DIRs from repeated to reference CTs, and voxel-by-voxel dose ranges determined an error-bar for DDA. Followed by evaluating, a previously proposed early-stage DDA uncertainty estimation method tested for lung cancer, which combines geometric DIR uncertainties, dose gradients and their directional dependence, in the context of HNC. Results Applying multiple DIRs show dose differences, pronounced in high dose gradient regions. The patient with largest anatomical changes (−13.1 % in ROI body volume), exhibited 33 % maximum uncertainty in contralateral parotid, with 54 % of voxels presenting an uncertainty >5 %. Accumulation over multiple CTs partially mitigated uncertainties. The estimation approach predicted 92.6 % of voxels within ±5 % to the reference dose uncertainty across all patients. Conclusions DIR variations impact accumulated doses, emphasizing DDA uncertainty quantification's importance for HNC patients. Multiple DIR dose warping aids in quantifying DDA uncertainties. An estimation approach previously described for lung cancer was successfully validated for HNC, for SIB plans, presenting different dose gradients, and for accumulated treatments.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?