Abstract:Abstract. Wetlands are the largest and most uncertain natural sources of atmospheric methane (CH4). Several process-based models have been developed to quantify the magnitude and estimate spatial and temporal variations in CH4 emissions from global wetlands. Reliable models are required to estimate global wetland CH4 emissions. This study aimed to test two process-based models, CH4MODwetland and Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM), against the CH4 flux measurements of marsh, swamp, peatland and coastal wetland sites across the world; specifically, model accuracy and generality were evaluated for different wetland types and in different continents, and then the global CH4 emissions from 2000 to 2010 were estimated. Both models showed similar high correlations with the observed seasonal/annual total CH4 emissions, and the regression of the observed versus computed total seasonal/annual CH4 emissions resulted in R2 values of 0.81 and 0.68 for CH4MODwetland and TEM, respectively. The CH4MODwetland produced accurate predictions for marshes, peatlands, swamps and coastal wetlands, with model efficiency (EF) values of 0.22, 0.52, 0.13 and 0.72, respectively. TEM produced good predictions for peatlands and swamps, with EF values of 0.69 and 0.74, respectively, but it could not accurately simulate marshes and coastal wetlands (EF <0). There was a good correlation between the simulated CH4 fluxes and the observed values on most continents. However, CH4MODwetland showed no correlation with the observed values in South America and Africa. TEM showed no correlation with the observations in Europe. The global CH4 emissions for the period 2000–2010 were estimated to be 105.31 ± 2.72 Tg yr−1 by CH4MODwetland and 134.31 ± 0.84 Tg yr−1 by TEM. Both models simulated a similar spatial distribution of CH4 emissions globally and on different continents. Marshes contribute 36 %–39 % of global CH4 emissions. Lakes/rivers and swamps are the second and third greatest contributors, respectively. Other wetland types account for only approximately 20 % of global emissions. Based on the model applicability, if we use the more accurate model, i.e., the one that performs best as evidenced by a higher model efficiency and a lower model bias, to estimate each continent and wetland type, we obtain a new assessment of 116.99–124.74 Tg yr−1 for the global CH4 emissions for the period 2000–2010. Our results imply that performance at a global scale may conceal model uncertainty. Efforts should be made to improve model accuracy for different wetland types and regions, particularly hotspot regions, to reduce the uncertainty in global assessments.

Quantifying Global Wetland Methane Emissions With In Situ Methane Flux Data and Machine Learning Approaches

Critical needs to close monitoring gaps in pan-tropical wetland CH4 emissions

WetCH4: A Machine Learning-based Upscaling of Methane Fluxes of Northern Wetlands during 2016–2022

Global Wetland Methane Emissions From 2001 to 2020: Magnitude, Dynamics and Controls

Observational constraints reduce model spread but not uncertainty in global wetland methane emission estimates

Evaluation of CH4MOD<sub>wetland</sub> and Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) used to estimate global CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from natural wetlands

Climate-driven Increase of Natural Wetland Methane Emissions Offset by Human-Induced Wetland Reduction in China over the Past Three Decades.

High-Resolution Estimation of Methane Emissions from Boreal and Pan-Arctic Wetlands Using Advanced Satellite Data

Underestimation of Methane Emissions From the Sudd Wetland: Unraveling the Impact of Wetland Extent Dynamics

Modeled production, oxidation, and transport processes of wetland methane emissions in temperate, boreal, and Arctic regions

Satellite-based modeling of wetland methane emissions on a global scale (SatWetCH4 1.0)

Machine Learning Driven Sensitivity Analysis of E3SM Land Model Parameters for Wetland Methane Emissions

Methane Emissions from Rice Paddies Natural Wetlands, and Lakes in China: Synthesis and New Estimate.

Global Wetland Contribution to 2000–2012 Atmospheric Methane Growth Rate Dynamics

Unraveling Spatially Diverse and Interactive Regulatory Mechanisms of Wetland Methane Fluxes to Improve Emission Estimation

Estimate of methane release from temperate natural wetlands using ENVISAT/SCIAMACHY data in China

Cold-Season Methane Fluxes Simulated by GCP-CH<sub>4</sub> Models

Critical inundation level for methane emissions from wetlands

Underestimated Dry Season Methane Emissions from Wetlands in the Pantanal

An Attempt to Quantify the Impact of Changes in Wetland Extent on Methane Emissions on the Seasonal and Interannual Time Scales

Evaluating alternative ebullition models for predicting peatland methane emission and its pathways via data–model fusion