Different Interventional Treatments of Large or Giant Intracranial Aneurysms:a Single Center Experience
CHEN Yan,YANG Peng-Fei,ZHOU Yu,HUANG Qing-Hai,HONG Bo,ZHAO Wen-Yuan,XU Yi,LIU Jian-Min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2013.11.005
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinic efficacy, complication and prognosis of different interventional modalities in the treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms. Methods Between January 2001 and December 2010, 134 patients with large and giant intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approaches in the Department of Neurosurgery of Changhai Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 134 patients, 11 had been treated by parent artery occlusion, 20 by coil embolization, 78 by stent-assisted coil, and the rest 25 patients by Tubridge. Patients were followed up for 6~44 months after the procedure. Angiographic results were evaluated with Raymond grading system, whereas clinical outcomes were evaluated with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Favorable prognosis rate when discharge, the cure rate, the recurrence rate and favorable prognosis rate when follow-up, complication incidence were compared. Results The rate of favorable prognosis in the parent artery occlusion group was 100%, coil embolization group was 70.0%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 91% and flow-diverter device group was 100%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P=0.0030). At the time oflast follow-up, the cure rate of the parent artery occlusion group was 63.6%, coil embolization group was 5.6%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 37.2% and flow-diverter device group was 72%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P=0.0002). At the time of last follow-up, the recurrence rate of the parent artery occlusion group was 0%, coil embolization group was 83.3%, stentassisted coil embolization group was 30.8% and flow-diverter device group was 0%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P<0.0001). The last follow-up favorable prognosis rate of the parent artery occlusion group was 100%, coil embolization group was 75%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 90% and flow-diverter device group was 100%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P=0.0209). The complication incidence of the parent artery occlusion group was 27.3%, coil embolization group was 30%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 14.1% and flow-diverter device group was 0%; however, there were no statistical differences in the complication incidence between the four groups (P=0.0650). Conclusion Endovascular treatment of large or giant intracranial aneurysms is very challenging. Coil embolization is often associated with a very high recurrence rate, stent-assisted coil embolization can reduce the recurrence rate, parent artery occlusion gets satisfied favorable prognosis and recurrence rate, but the complication incidence is relatively high, the preliminary clinical results of flow diverter device appear to be satisfactory.