Abstract:The purpose of this study was to examine the potential interdependent relationships between religiosity, conservatism, social value orientation and philanthropy. Participants included members of four religious institutions. A non-experimental survey design was used gather information. Subjects were given a hypothetical task related to social value orientation, two scales of measurement related to religiosity and philanthropy and asked to self-identifr their political orientation. Chi Square analysis identified a significant relationship between political orientation and social value orientation. A correlation was found between religiosity and philanthropy within the liberal sample, rather than in the suspected conservative sample. Additionally, a one-way analysis of variance revealed that there were no significant differences in attitudes towards philanthropy. Results provide support for models suggesting that religion promotes competing psychological stances: conservatism and a prosocial value orientation. The Pew Research Center (2012) recently reported that America's politics fall along partisan lines and are more polarized than at any other time in the previous 25 years. This sentiment is often alluded to in today's media, and the 2012 Presidential election evidenced this as well. Each candidate emphasized that the 2012 election was about the fundamentally different paths on which America could be lead. A primary way that the policies of conservatives and liberals differ is the degree to which they facilitate government intervention in socioeconomic matters. Generally, the conservative base supports policies that stress minimal intervention. What is striking about this is that a core component of the conservative base is largely religious. While religious institutions typically promote prosocial attitudes and action, such as helping the poor, conservative economics reduce the amount of spending on social welfare programs. It seems that in regard to helping those of a lower socioeconomic class, political conservatism violates one of the primary tenets of most churches, yet many religious individuals continue to identify with conservative ideology (Guth, Kellstedt, Smidt, & Green, 2006; Kelly & Morgan, 2008; Layman & Carmines, 1997). This apparent contradiction was addressed extensively in a study conducted by Malka, Soto, Cohen, & Miller (2011). Their research was based on the hypothesis that religion has competing psychological influences on social welfare attitudes, and findings suggested that religiosity was a predictor for both opposition and approval of social welfare programs. It was argued that there are two pathways by which an individual can be influenced: one stressing conservatism, the other stressing prosocial values. Although specific determinants leading an individual to either pathway were not identified, the conservative pathway can be understood by recognizing that many politically conservative messages are those that are supported by the church. For instance, stances on sexuality, abortion and traditional families are topics that are central to each institution's identity. In relation to these stances, opposition to social welfare was hypothesized to be connected to one's need to be consistent in his or her world views. Malka et al. (2011) state that when a religious individual's views are aligned with the conservative end of politics, he may, in turn, "drag" his view of social welfare toward the conservative side so that his

An Analytical Framework for Understanding the Intensity of Religious Fundamentalism

A Simulation Study of How Religious Fundamentalism Takes Root

How Fundamentalism Takes Root: A Simulation Study

METHODOLOGY FOR STUDYING THE PROBLEM OF WAR AND PEACE IN PERSONAL RELIGIOUS BELIEFS

Fundamentalism as dogmatic belief, moral rigorism, and strong groupness across cultures: Dimensionality, underlying components, and related interreligious prejudice.

The Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale: cross-cultural application, validity evidence, and relationship with religious orientation and the Big 5 factor markers1

Policy Analysis on Local Government Fiscal Squeeze, Political Connections, and Simulation on Religious Fundamentalism

Developing a novel inclusive policy analysis framework based on capability approach and institutional analysis and development method

Intratextual Fundamentalism and the Desire for Simple Cognitive Structure: The Moderating Effect of the Ability to Achieve Cognitive Structure

A political radicalization framework based on Moral Foundations Theory

Identifying the 'deep roots' of economic freedom with implications for policy and economic reform

Religion, Culture, and Politics: Analyzing the Influence of Religious Beliefs on Sociopolitical Dynamics

INTERNALIZATION OF RELIGIOUS MODERATION TO IMPROVE THINKING SKILLS OF HINDU HUMAN RESOURCES

The Constitutional Struggle for Religious Freedom: A Comparative Study of India and Indonesia

Against Fundamentalism

Attitudes towards Religions: The Impact of Being Out of the Religious Group

Anatomy of creeping authoritarianism in Bangladesh: a historical analysis of some events that shaped the present state of Bangladesh’s culture and politics

A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity

Ecodomical Attempts to Ideologically Transform the World into a Protective Realm for All Human Beings through Using the Concept of Goodness in Dealing with the Reality of Religion

Financial Inclusion- A Theoretical Framework

A study of religiosity and conservatismin relation to social value orientation and philanthropy