Inequalities in the risk and prevention of invasive meningococcal disease in the United States – A systematic literature review
Shahina Begum,Oscar Herrera-Restrepo,Catherine Rolland,Sneha Purushotham,Anar Andani,Hiral Shah,Zeki Kocaata
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2024.2406613
2024-10-08
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Abstract:Vaccination remains the most effective strategy to prevent invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), with MenACWY, MenB and MenABCWY recommended for adolescents/young adults in the United States (US). However, vaccination coverage remains suboptimal, which could be related to population inequalities. To understand the impact of IMD risk, prevention and control inequalities, a global systematic literature review (Medline, Embase, 2012–2022) was conducted on individual, socioeconomic, and environmental inequalities associated with IMD risk, prevention and control in all ages. Studies on IMD risk (n = 15) and prevention (n = 14) inequalities were identified. IMD incidence proportions were higher in Medicaid versus commercially insured populations, and IMD mortality was higher in poorer neighborhoods. White adolescents, adolescents from lower income families, and with lower maternal education were more likely to receive MenB vaccination; while Black and Hispanic adolescents, and adolescents with higher family incomes, were more likely to receive MenACWY vaccination. Meningococcal vaccination was associated with being up-to-date with other vaccinations, having multiple healthcare/well child visits, having a pediatrician as healthcare provider (HCP), and attending private facilities; while being uninsured was associated with lower vaccination. States with a MenACWY vaccination mandate and higher pediatrician-to-children ratios had higher vaccination rates. Important inequalities were due to individual differences, socioeconomic, and environmental factors. IMD prevention is suboptimal, especially among adolescents/young adults. To improve health equity, health policy makers could ameliorate meningococcal vaccination coverage across the US, with simplified and stronger meningococcal vaccine recommendations from public health authorities, and initiatives to enhance parental/patient and HCP knowledge of IMD and vaccine recommendations. (1) What is the context? Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a severe disease with a high risk of death and long-term sequelae in survivors. Three types of vaccines are recommended in the United States (US) to prevent IMD among adolescents and young adults: MenACWY, MenB, and MenABCWY. According to the World Health Organization, access to vaccination, regardless of socioeconomic status, is one of the most important ways to achieve equitable health standards. However, US vaccine coverage is suboptimal, especially among older adolescents and young adults, possibly because of population-based inequalities. This study investigated the impact of inequalities on IMD incidence, mortality, and vaccination in the US. (2) What is new? A systematic literature review identified several studies reporting on inequalities for IMD risk and prevention. IMD cases and deaths were more likely in poorer populations. Vaccination coverage varied according to race/ethnicity, income, and education levels. Vaccination was more likely in people with frequent healthcare visits, those who received other vaccinations, those who visit a pediatrician, and those who go to a non-public/private facility for care. Vaccination was less likely in uninsured people. States with a MenACWY vaccination mandate and with greater access to pediatricians had better vaccination rates. (3) What is the impact? Many inequalities exist in relation to the risk of getting IMD and the chances of getting vaccinated against IMD. To improve IMD prevention, health policy makers need to strengthen and simplify current meningococcal vaccine recommendations, and introduce/support initiatives that increase parental/patient and HCP awareness of IMD and vaccine recommendations.
immunology,biotechnology & applied microbiology