Abstract:Disclosing the full potential of functional nanomaterials requires the optimization of synthetic protocols and an effective size screening tool, aiming at triggering their size-dependent properties. Here we demonstrate the successful combination of a wide-angle X-ray total scattering approach with a deep learning classifier for quantum dots sizing in both colloidal and dry states. This work offers a compelling alternative to the lengthy process of deriving sizing curves from transmission electron microscopy coupled with spectroscopic measurements, especially in the ultra-small size regime, where empirical functions exhibit larger discrepancies. The core of our algorithm is an all-convolutional neural network trained on Debye scattering equation simulations, incorporating atomistic models to capture structural and morphological features, and augmented with physics-informed perturbations to account for different predictable experimental conditions. The model performances are evaluated using both wide-angle X-ray total scattering simulations and experimental datasets collected on lead sulfide quantum dots, resulting in size classification accuracies surpassing 97%. With the developed deep learning size classifier, we overcome the need for calibration curves for quantum dots sizing and thanks to the unified modeling approach at the basis of the total scattering method implemented, we include simultaneously structural and microstructural aspects in the classification process. This algorithm can be complemented by incorporating input information from other experimental observations (e.g., small angle X-ray scattering data) and, after proper training with the pertinent simulations, can be extended to other classes of quantum dots, providing the nanoscience community with a powerful and broad tool to accelerate the development of functional (nano)materials.

Automated selection of nanoparticle models for small-angle X-ray scattering data analysis using machine learning

Influence of device configuration and noise on a machine learning predictor for the selection of nanoparticle small-angle X-ray scattering models

Machine Learning-Assisted Analysis of Small Angle X-ray Scattering

Deep Learning-Assisted Characterization of Nanoparticle Growth Processes: Unveiling SAXS Structure Evolution

Predicting Colloidal Interaction Parameters from Small Angle X-Ray Scattering Curves using Artificial Neural Networks and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Sampling

Automated Structure Analysis of Small Angle Scattering Data via Machine Learning

Machine learning-accelerated small-angle X-ray scattering analysis of disordered two- and three-phase materials

Integrating machine learning with -SAS for enhanced structural analysis in small-angle scattering: applications in biological and artificial macromolecular complexes

A Computational Model for Data Acquisition in SAXS

In Silico Profiling Nanoparticles: Predictive Nanomodeling Using Universal Nanodescriptors and Various Machine Learning Approaches

Classification of ab initio models of proteins restored from small-angle X-ray scattering

Machine Learning Automated Approach for Enormous Synchrotron X-Ray Diffraction Data Interpretation

Machine Learning Automated Analysis of Enormous Synchrotron X-ray Diffraction Datasets

Data-driven approach for synchrotron X-ray Laue microdiffraction scan analysis

Small-angle X-ray scattering simulations on a single Pt nanoparticle system: An analysis of structural characteristics

Application of machine learning approaches in the analysis of mass absorption cross-section of black carbon aerosols: Aerosol composition dependencies and sensitivity analyses

Computational Analysis of SAXS Data Acquisition.

Analysis of extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) data using artificial intelligence techniques

Highly sensitive 2D X-ray absorption spectroscopy via physics informed machine learning

A deep learning approach for quantum dots sizing from wide-angle X-ray scattering data

Nanoparticle Size Distribution Quantification: Results of a SAXS Inter-Laboratory Comparison