Impact of Population Movement on the Spread of 2019-Ncov in China
Chi Zhang,Chen Cai,Wei Shen,Feng Tang,Hao Lei,Yu Xie,Zicheng Cao,Kang Tang,Junbo Bai,Lehan Xiao,Yutian Xu,Yanxin Song,Jiwei Chen,Zhihui Guo,Yichen Guo,Xiao Wang,Modi Xu,Huachun Zou,Yuelong Shu,Xiangjun Du
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3546090
2020-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Background: Since Dec 2019, Wuhan and other cities in China have experienced an outbreak caused by a novel coronavirus, 2019-nCoV. Even worse, this outbreak overlapped with the traditional Chinese Spring Festival, a time when billions of people travel across the country. The government has implemented a number of policies and interventions, including a travel ban from and to Wuhan since Jan 23, 2020, an extension of the Spring Festival holiday, etc. However, a considerable volume of population movement had already occurred before the travel ban, potentially causing the spread of cases to other cities in China. As people return to their place of work, this reflux of population movement is also likely to facilitate transmission of 2019-nCoV. Thus, it is urgent to evaluate the impact of existing population movement and future population reflux on the spread of 2019-nCoV, to provide evidence for precise control of the epidemic. Methods: We used domestic human mobility data from January to February (2019-20) to infer the population movement network between cities in China. We obtained data on confirmed cases from the daily official reports of the health commission of 34 provincial-level administrative units and 341 city-level units, from the time of the outbreak to Feb 14, 2020. We used a linear regression model to simulate the relationship between population flow and imported cases, and evaluate the deduction and risk of imported cases in different scenarios of human movement. Findings: There is a statistically significant positive correlation between population influx from Wuhan and confirmed cases in other cities across China (R2=0×85, P <0×001), especially cities in Hubei (R2=0×88, P <0×001). Compared with the implemented travel ban on Jan 23, no restrictions may have increased 118% (91%-172%) of the overall cases [13,857 (10,920-20,574) more cases] for the coming week, and a travel ban taken three days earlier would have reduced 47% (26%-58%) of the cases [3,103 (1,732-3,820) cases] for the early stage of spreading [83% (78%-89%) protection rate for a travel ban a week earlier]. And we would expect a 61% (48%-92%) [30,490 (24,015-46,074) cases] increase of overall cumulative cases without any restrictions on returning residents and an 11% (8%-16%) [5,275 (4,188-7,895) cases] increase of overall cumulative cases if the travel ban stays in place for Hubei. Cities with more population reflux in the future from Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, and Capital Economic Circle regions are at higher risk. Interpretation: Given that population movement plays an important role in spreading of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), there is high risk for emerging new outbreak centers, large cities with huge amount of population reflux in particular. Sustained public health interventions should be strengthened for these cities.Funding Statement: This project was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFC0840900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970643 & 81961128002), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant No. KQTD20180411143323605), and Guangdong Frontier and Key Tech Innovation Program (2019B020228001 & 2019B111103001). Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.