Abstract:Threat cues have been widely shown to elicit increased sensory and attentional neural processing. However, whether this enhanced recruitment leads to measurable behavioral improvements in perception is still in question. Here we adjudicate between two opposing theories: that threat cues do or do not enhance perceptual sensitivity. We created threat stimuli by pairing one direction of motion in a random dot kinematogram with an aversive sound. While in the MRI scanner, 46 subjects (both men and women) completed a cued (threat/safe/neutral) perceptual decision-making task where they indicated the perceived motion direction of each moving dots stimulus. We found strong evidence that threat cues did not increase perceptual sensitivity compared to safe and neutral cues. This lack of improvement in perceptual decision-making ability occurred despite the threat cue resulting in widespread increases in frontoparietal BOLD activity, as well as increased connectivity between the right insula and the frontoparietal network. These results call into question the intuitive claim that expectation automatically enhances our perception of threat, and highlight the role of the frontoparietal network in prioritizing the processing of threat-related environmental cues. Significance Statement Threatening information receives enhanced priority processing in the brain. Evidence of increased neural activity to threat has fostered the current view that such selective processing leads to a boost in perception, suggesting that motivationally relevant top-down effects can directly change what we see. In the real world, danger is often preceded by an environmental cue that predicts its imminent approach. Here we used an aversive conditioning paradigm to test whether threat cues can change subjects’ ability to visually distinguish between threat and safe stimuli. Our results provide strong evidence for the lack of an effect of threat expectation on perceptual sensitivity, supporting the theory that perception is impenetrable by top-down cognitive influences despite robust neural attentional priority.

Independence Threat or Interdependence Threat? The Focusing Effect on Social or Physical Threat Modulates Brain Activity

Perception of Threatening Intention Modulates Brain Processes to Body Actions: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials

Prioritized neural processing of social threats during perceptual decision-making

Comparison of attentional resource allocation to threat and selfrelevant information: An event-related potentials study

Spatial Attention Effects of Disgusted and Fearful Faces

Comparison of Attentional Resource Allocation to Threat and Self-Relevant Information: an Event-Related Potentials Study

Neural Processing Of Threat Cues In Social Environments

Is processing superiority a universal trait for all threats? Divergent impacts of fearful, angry, and disgusted faces on attentional capture

Two different faces of threat. Comparing the neural systems for recognizing fear and anger in dynamic body expressions

Action opportunities modulate attention allocation under social threat.

The neural basis of intergroup threat effect on social attention

Looming Angry Faces: Preliminary Evidence of Differential Electrophysiological Dynamics for Filtered Stimuli via Low and High Spatial Frequencies

Attention Modulates Neural Responses to Unpredictable Emotional Faces in Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.

The Brain Active Pattern when Individuals Facing Threatening Faces

Attentional bias to threat is modulated by stimulus content: an fNIRS study

Threat Shapes Visual Context Sensitivity Selectively Through Low-Spatial-frequency Channels.

Parsing Neural Mechanisms Of Social And Physical Risk Identifications

Modulatory effects of goal relevance on emotional attention reveal that fear has a distinct value

Threat expectation does not improve perceptual discrimination despite causing heightened priority processing in the frontoparietal network

Unpredictable threat increases early event‐related potential amplitudes and cardiac acceleration: A brain–heart coupling study

Improved Perception of Aggression Under (un)Related Threat of Shock