Abstract:Introduction Orthopedics has a reputation for being competitive but not diverse. Leaders of the orthopedics community have been making efforts to increase the participation of women and minorities in the field by raising awareness and strengthening pipeline programs. We aim to explore the trends in the risk of not matching by comparing the proportions of women and underrepresented populations in the applicant pools versus proportions in residency programs. Simultaneously, we aim to evaluate if women or underrepresented population applicants exhibit a lower likelihood of applying to orthopedics compared to male and White applicants. Methods The study received an IRB exemption. The authors collected Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) data books for the years 2015-2016 to 2022-2023 to obtain demographic information on orthopedic residents in training during each of those academic years. The pool of corresponding applicants (for example: residents in training during the 2021-2022 academic year would consist of five classes, made up of applicants from 2016-2017 to 2020-2021) was then tabulated from Electronic Residency Applications Service (ERAS) statistics, which are publicly available on the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) website. The race and gender composition of the applicant pool was compared to that of corresponding enrolled residents to calculate the relative risk (RR) of women not matching compared to men and underrepresented population applicants (Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Native Americans) compared to White applicants. ERAS data was subsequently used to calculate the percentages of each demographic applying to all residency programs and orthopedic programs. Results For female applicants into orthopedic residency, they had a similar RR of going unmatched when compared to their male counterparts. In the academic year 2020-2021, there was an exception to this as women had a slightly higher RR of going unmatched. All underrepresented populations had a higher risk of not matching compared to White applicants for all cycles, peaking for residents in training in 2020-2021. The trendline improved for residents in the following year. Throughout the study, women accounted for 46.61% of applicants applying for any residency; however, they only accounted for 16.98% of applicants applying for orthopedic residency. A similar discrepancy is noted among Asian applicants but not Black or Hispanic applicants. Conclusions Underrepresented populations were increasingly less likely to match into orthopedics relative to White applicants until 2021. In the academic year of 2021-2022, there was an improvement in this trend for all studied underrepresented populations. Although the exact explanation for this is unclear, it is associated with the transition to virtual applicant interactions. The female gender did not appear to be a consistent advantage or disadvantage in the match. Women and Asian applicants were less likely to apply to orthopedics than other specialties.

Underrepresented in Medicine Applicants are Less Likely to Successfully Match into Plastic Surgery

The Law of Diminishing Returns in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Match: A Deeper Look at the Numbers

The Independent Plastic Surgery Match (2010-2018): Applicant and Program Trends, Predictors of a Successful Match, and Future Directions

Unveiling the Need to Improve Personalized Applicant Tools: A Critical Evaluation of the Reliability of the Texas STAR database in Predicting Match Success for Plastic Surgery Applicants

Characteristics Associated with Successful Residency Match in General Surgery

Analysis of Reapplications to Integrated and Independent Plastic Surgery Residency

Recent Trends in the Effect of Race and Gender on the Orthopedics Match

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery: Where Do We Stand? Highlighting Overlooked Issues in Efforts to Improve Representation

Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Applicant Trends and Comparison With Other Surgical Specialties

Characteristics of Successful Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicants from US Allopathic Medical Schools without a Home Integrated Program

Exposure to plastic surgery during undergraduate medical training: A single-institution review

Continued underrepresentation of historically excluded groups in the neurosurgery pipeline: an analysis of racial and ethnic trends across stages of medical training from 2012 to 2020

Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine as Plastic Surgery Residents: Demographics, Credentials, and Pathways to Residency

Factors associated with matching into research-focused dermatology residency programs

Application Discrepancies in the 2023–2024 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match

Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Applicant Survey: Characteristics of Successful Applicants and Feedback about the Interview Process

816 Comparing Match Data for Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery Applicants From 2016-2022: Is There a Point of Diminishing Return for Research Experiences and Publications?

Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicant Review: Important Factors and Selection Criteria

Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023–2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis

Effect of USMLE Score Cutoffs on Recruitment of Underrepresented Applicants in the Urology Match