Abstract:Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the predictors of outcomes and refractoriness in status epilepticus (SE). Methods: This is a prospective study of 59 adult patients with SE who were admitted to the Emergency Department between February 2012 and December 2013. The effects of clinical, demographic, and electrophysiologic features of patients with SE were evaluated. To evaluate outcome in SE, STESS, mSTESS, and EMSE scales were used. Results: Logistic regression analysis showed that being aged ≥65years (p=0.02, OR: 17.68, 95% CI: [1.6-198.4]) for the short term and having potentially fatal etiology (p=0.027, OR: 11.7, 95% CI: [1.3-103]) for the long term were the only independent predictors of poor outcomes; whereas, the presence of periodic epileptiform discharges (PEDs) in EEG was the only independent predictor of refractoriness (p=0.032, OR: 13.7, 95% CI: [1.3-148.5]). The patients with ≥3 Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) did not have poorer outcomes in the short- (p=0.157) and long term (p=0.065). There was no difference between patients with 0-2, 3-4, and ≥4 mSTESS in the short- and long term in terms of outcome (p=0.28 and 0.063, respectively). Also, there was no difference between subgroups (convulsive SE [CSE], nonconvulsive SE [NCSE], and epilepsia partialis continua [EPC]) in terms of STESS and mSTESS. When patients with EPC were excluded, both STESS and mSTESS scores of the patients correlated with poorer long-term outcomes (p=0.025 and 0.017, respectively). The patients with ≥64 points in the Epidemiology-based Mortality in SE-Etiology, age, comorbidity, EEG (EMSE-EACE) score and those with ≥27 points in EMSE-Etiology, age, comorbidity (EMSE-EAC) score did not have poorer outcomes in the short term (p=0.06 and 0.274, respectively) while they had significantly poorer outcome in the long term (p<0.001 and 0.002, respectively). In subgroup analysis, patients with CSE with ≥64 points in EMSE-EACE had significantly poorer outcome in the both short- and long term (p=0.014 and 0.012, respectively), and patients with CSE with ≥27 points in EMSE-EAC had significantly poorer outcome in the long term (p=0.03) but not in the short term (p=0.186). Outcomes did not correlate with EMSE scores in patients with NCSE and EPC. Status epilepticus was terminated with intravenous (IV) levetiracetam (LEV) in 68.75% of patients and with IV phenytoin (PHT) in 83.3% of patients. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of efficacy (p=0.334). Conclusion: Being aged ≥65years predicts poor short-term outcomes, and having potentially fatal etiology predicts poor long-term outcomes, which highlight the importance of SE treatment management in the elderly. Both STESS and mSTESS are not predictive for poor outcomes in EPC. Excluding patients with EPC, STESS, and mSTESS could predict poor long-term outcomes but not in the short term in SE. Epidemiology-based Mortality in Status Epilepticus score could predict poor outcome in the long term better than STESS and mSTESS. Specifically, EMSE scores correlated with poor outcome in patients with CSE but not with NCSE and EPC. New scales are needed to predict outcome especially in patients with NCSE and EPC. The presence of PEDs in EEG is a predictor of RSE, and EMSE score can also be used to predict RSE. There was no difference in the efficacy of IV LEV and IV PHT in SE. This study is significant for having one of the longest follow-up periods in the literature.

Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in the Critically Ill Elderly

NCSE-coma in older adults: Clinical data, initial EEG, and hospital outcome

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus after convulsive status epilepticus: Clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic factors

Clinical analysis of twenty-eight elderly patients with convulsive status epilepticus

Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus: A Review for Emergency Clinicians

Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: 5 Cases Report and Literature Review

Predictors of outcomes and refractoriness in status epilepticus: A prospective study

The clinical features and EEG findings of nonconvulsive status epilepticus

Status Epilepticus in Patients with Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis Requiring Intensive Care: A Follow-Up Study

Clinical and Electroencephalographic Predictors of Seizures and Status Epilepticus in 12,450 Critically Ill Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Relationship between continuous EEG monitoring findings and prognostic factors in patients with status epilepticus

Electroencephalography (EEG) for Neurological Prognostication in Post-Anoxic Coma Following Cardiac Arrest and Its Relationship to Outcome

Long-term outcome in new onset refractory status epilepticus: a retrospective study

Evaluation of prognostic scores for status epilepticus in the neurology ICU: A retrospective study

New understanding of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in adults: treatments and challenges

Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Adults and Adolescents of Southwest China: Mortality, Etiology, and Predictors of Death

ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study

Prediction of in-hospital mortality in status epilepticus: Evaluation of four scoring tools in younger and older adult patients

Seizures, Status Epilepticus, and Continuous EEG in the Intensive Care Unit

Can endotracheal intubation be the first step in management of nonconvulsive status epilepticus?: A case report

Neurological outcome of postanoxic refractory status epilepticus after aggressive treatment