Abstract:This paper draws on macroeconomics, the economics of institutions and the economics of trust to explain private savings at the national level for 33 OECD (mostly European) countries from 2002 to 2012. More specifically, it raises two questions: (i) is it the quality of institutions or trust in institutions that drives private savings? (ii) if trust matters, what is the appropriate institutional level at which it operates? To answer these questions, we add to the usual explanatory variables of private savings three measures of institutional quality and six measures of institutional trust, distributed between the following institutional levels, presented in assumed hierarchical order: political, legal, financial and social. We find that trust in political institutions is the most significant driver of private savings. This contributes to the literature underlining the importance of subjectivity in social and economic phenomena and suggests, for private bank savings in countries having highly regulated banking systems, the existence of a hierarchy of trust in which trust in the highest-ranking institutions (political – and to a lesser extent legal – institutions) acts as a substitute for trust in every lower-ranking institution (financial institutions and social trust).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper aims to explore the relationship between institutional quality, trust, and private savings, specifically focusing on data from 33 OECD countries (mainly European countries) from 2002 to 2012. Specifically, the paper raises two core questions:
1. **Is it the quality of institutions or trust in institutions that drives private savings?**
- The study seeks to determine whether it is the objective quality of the institutions themselves or the subjective trust people have in these institutions that has a greater impact on private savings.
2. **If trust is indeed important, at which institutional level does it play a role?**
- The study further explores the role of trust at different institutional levels (political, legal, financial, and social) to identify which level of trust has the most significant impact on private savings.
### Research Background
- **Macroeconomic Background**: Savings play a crucial role in a country's macroeconomy. Recent studies have identified some key factors affecting savings rates, but these studies often overlook institutional factors.
- **Importance of Institutions**: Good institutions can create good incentive mechanisms, limit the risk of predation, and encourage capital accumulation. Therefore, good institutions are considered a necessary precondition for savings and economic growth.
- **Role of Trust**: Trust economics suggests that people's beliefs play an important role in economic and social phenomena. Therefore, even if the quality of the institutions themselves is not high, as long as people believe in these institutions, it may promote savings.
### Research Methods
- **Data Source**: The study uses data from Grigoli et al., covering macroeconomic indicators and multiple indicators of institutional quality and trust for 33 OECD countries.
- **Variable Settings**: The study introduces three institutional quality indicators (quality of political, legal, and financial institutions) and six trust indicators (trust in political, legal, financial, and social institutions).
- **Regression Analysis**: Various regression models (such as Ordinary Least Squares, Fixed Effects Model, Two-Stage Least Squares, and System Generalized Method of Moments) are used to analyze the impact of these variables on private savings rates.
### Main Findings
- **Importance of Political Trust**: The study finds that trust in political institutions is the most significant factor driving private savings. This suggests that in a highly regulated banking system, trust in higher-level institutions (political and legal institutions) can substitute for trust in lower-level institutions (financial and social institutions).
- **Hierarchy of Trust**: The study supports a hierarchy of trust, where trust in higher-level institutions can substitute for trust in lower-level institutions.
### Conclusion
- **Institutional Quality vs. Trust**: While institutional quality is also important, trust in institutions is more crucial in driving private savings.
- **Policy Recommendations**: Governments should focus on enhancing the credibility of political and legal institutions to promote private savings and economic growth.
Through these analyses, the paper provides new perspectives on understanding the complex relationship between institutional quality, trust, and private savings, and offers valuable references for policymakers.