Abstract:We investigate the dynamics of $f(R)$ gravity in Jordan and Einstein frames. First, we perform a phase-space singularities analysis in both frames. We show that, typically, anisotropic singularities are absent in the Einstein frame, whereas they may appear in the Jordan frame. We conciliate this apparent inconsistency by showing that the necessary conditions for the existence of the Einstein frame are namely the same ones assuring the absence of the anisotropic singularities in the Jordan frame. In other words, we show that, at least in the context of Bianchi I cosmologies, the Einstein frame is available only when the original formulation in the Jordan frame is free of anisotropic singularities. Furthermore, we present a novel dynamical system formulation for anisotropic cosmologies in which both frames, provided they exist, will be manifestly equivalent from the dynamical point of view, even though they fail to be diffeomorphic in general. Our results could help not only the construction of viable (free of anisotropic singularities) $f(R)$ cosmological models, but also contribute to the still active debate on the physical interpretation of the two frames.

Noninertial frames that can mimic gravitational fields

Non-inertial frames that can mimic gravitational fields

Einstein's Equivalence principle for superpositions of gravitational fields and quantum reference frames

Reference Frames and the Physical Gravito-Electromagnetic Analogy

About the (in)equivalence between holonomic versus non-holonomic theories of gravity

Relativistic gravitational force

Local Inertial Coordinate System and The Principle of Equivalence

Effective Inertial Frame in an Atom Interferometric Test of the Equivalence Principle

Dynamical equivalence of $f(R)$ gravity in Jordan and Einstein frames

On the Equivalence Principle and Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies

Equivalence Principle and Machian origin of extended gravity

The cosmological frame principle and cosmic acceleration

The Equivalence Principle as a Noether Symmetry

Determining the difference between local acceleration and local gravity: applications of the equivalence principle to relativistic trajectories

Is the principle of equivalence a principle?

Energy and equations of motion in a tentative theory of gravity with a privileged reference frame

Gravity as Archimedes' thrust and a bifurcation in that theory

On the equivalence between different canonical forms of F(R) theory of gravity

Why scalar-tensor equivalent theories are not physically equivalent?

The equivalence principle and inertial-gravitational decoherence

Inequivalence of mimetic gravity with models of loop quantum gravity