Deuteron-equivalent and phase-equivalent interactions within light nuclei

A. M. Shirokov,V. A. Kulikov,A. I. Mazur,J. P. Vary,P. Maris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.85.034004
IF: 3.199
2012-03-26
Physical Review C
Abstract:Background: Phase-equivalent transformations (PETs) are well known in quantum scattering and inverse-scattering theory. PETs do not affect scattering phase shifts and bound-state energies of a two-body system but are conventionally supposed to modify two-body bound-state observables such as the rms radius and electromagnetic moments. Purpose: In order to preserve all bound-state observables, we propose a new particular case of PETs, a deuteron-equivalent transformation (DET-PET), which leaves unchanged not only scattering phase shifts and bound-state (deuteron) binding energy but also the bound-state wave function. Methods: The construction of DET-PET is discussed; equations defining the simplest DET-PETs are derived. We apply these simplest DET-PETs to the JISP16 NN interaction and use the transformed NN interactions in calculations of 3H and 4He binding energies in the no-core full configuration (NCFC) approach based on extrapolations of the no-core shell model (NCSM) basis space results to the infinite basis space. Results: We demonstrate the DET-PET modification of the np scattering wave functions and study the DET-PET manifestation in the binding energies of 3H and 4He nuclei and their correlation (Tjon line). Conclusions: It is shown that some DET-PETs generate modifications of the central component while the others modify the tensor component of the NN interaction. DET-PETs are able to modify significantly the np scattering wave functions and hence the off-shell properties of the NN interaction. DET-PETs give rise to significant changes in the binding energies of 3H (in the range of approximately 1.5 MeV) and 4He (in the range of more than 9 MeV) and are able to modify the correlation patterns of binding energies of these nuclei.
physics, nuclear
What problem does this paper attempt to address?