Correction: Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: An update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era
Kiesha Prem,Kevin van Zandvoort,Petra Klepac,Rosalind M. Eggo,Nicholas G. Davies,Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group, Alex R. Cook, Mark Jit
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012454
2024-09-19
PLoS Computational Biology
Abstract:After this article [1] was published, it came to light that there are a number of descriptive and coding errors in the article. To address this, the authors corrected the errors in their code and calculations and updated the text of their manuscript and Supporting Information. The changes do not have any substantial effect on the description of the quantitative results described in the article, or to the overall qualitative conclusions of the example model of physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The article was republished on September 4, 2024, to replace the original article with the updated, corrected version, to provide an updated link to the repository with the corrected version of the code, and to replace the original versions of Figs 2, 3, 4, and 5 with the updated versions generated using the corrected code. S1 Text in [1] was also replaced with the updated, corrected version. Please download this article again to view the correct version. The originally published, uncorrected article and the republished, corrected article are provided here for reference. The errors corrected are as follows: The article's main conclusions are not affected by the correction of the descriptive and coding errors. A summary of the changes to the results following the errata can be found in S3 File provided with this notice. A member of PLOS Computational Biology 's Editorial Board reviewed the updates and advised that all issues were satisfactorily addressed in the republished version of the article.
biochemical research methods,mathematical & computational biology