ERBB2 comprehensive profiling and prognostication in Stage III Colon Cancer: Findings from PETACC8 and IDEA-France cohorts

Camilla Pilati,Audrey Soulabaille,Claire Gallois,Hélène Blons,Anne Cayre,Marine Sroussi,Delphine Le Corre,Sophie Mouillet-Richard,Claire Mulot,Karine Le Malicot,Aurélien De Reynies,Jean-Baptiste Bachet,Christophe Borg,Frédéric Di Fiore,Rosine Guimbaud,Jaafar Bennouna,Thierry André,Julien Taieb,Frédérique Penault-Llorca,Pierre Laurent-Puig
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.10.046
IF: 29.4
2024-11-27
Gastroenterology
Abstract:Background & aims: ERBB2-pathway activation, through amplification or activating mutations, represents a new target for colon cancer (CC) treatment. We compared molecular methods to the gold-standard for assessing ERBB2 status and determined the prognostic value of ERBB2 amplification, mutations, and expression using data from two phase III trials involving nearly 3,000 stage III CC patients. Methods: In the PETACC8 trial, IHC/FISH, DNA, and RNA analysis were performed on 1813, 1719, and 1733 samples, respectively. In the IDEA-France trial, DNA and RNAseq were performed on 1129 and 1263 samples. The breast cancer SCAN-B cohort (n=3409) served as an external reference. A new molecular ERBB2-amplified status was defined using ERBB2 NGS-score, RNAseq expression, and clustering based on ERBB2 neighboring gene expression. Concordance between diagnostic techniques and the association between time-to-recurrence (TTR) and ERBB2-status were evaluated. Results: The prevalence of the molecular ERBB2-amplified group was 1.85% in PETACC8 and 1.5% in IDEA-France, with a concordance of 0.81 (95% CI [0.70-0.92]) with the gold-standard IHC/FISH method in PETACC8. A non-linear relationship was observed between TTR and ERBB2-expression, with extreme groups showing a less favorable prognosis (P<.0001) in both colon and breast cancers. Patients with molecular ERBB2-amplified status or mutations had the poorest prognosis, followed by low-expression and intermediate-expression groups (3-year TTR 67.0%, 71.2%, and 77.9%, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the low-expression group had a significantly shorter TTR (HR=1.28; 95%CI [1.07-1.52]). Conclusions: The molecular definition of ERBB2-status could represent a cost-effective alternative in stage III CC. ERBB2 alterations and low RNA expression significantly reduce TTR, highlighting the complex role of ERBB2.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?