Abstract:Birth size and shape are commonly used as indicators of fetal growth. Epidemiologic studies have suggested a relationship between birth size and the risk of developing cardiovascular disease in later life. Certain "growth phenotypes" have been linked to the development of certain components of cardiovascular disease, particularly babies who display disproportional growth in utero. These observations are based on retrospective analysis of historical data sets. If the "Fetal Origins of Adult Disease" hypothesis is to be generalisable to the present day, then it is essential to establish whether these "growth phenotypes" exist within the normal distribution of birth size. The UCL Fetal Growth Study is a prospective study of antenatal fetal growth assessed by ultrasound at 20 and 30 wk gestation in 1650 low risk, singleton, white pregnancies. Measures of birth size were obtained and analyzed by principal components to explain shape at birth. Birth measures were also related to antenatal growth measurements to determine the strength of ultrasound evaluation in determining subsequent growth. There was significant sexual dimorphism in all measures at birth, with males heavier, longer, and leaner than females. From 20 wk of gestation onwards, males had a significantly larger head size than females. Parity, maternal height, and body mass index were important determinants of birth weight (p < 0.001). Cigarette smoking influenced birth weight, length, and head circumference (p < 0.001) but had no effect on placental size. Principal component analysis revealed that proportionality was the predominant size/shape at birth (55% of variance explained). A further 18% of variance was explained by a contrast between weight, head circumference, and length versus three skinfolds. Anthropometric measures as assessed by ultrasound at 20 and 30 wk gestation were poor predictors of birth length, weight, and head circumference (adjusted R(2) 18, 40, and 28% at 30 wk gestation scan, respectively). These predictions were not improved by including growth patterns between 20 and 30 wk. There is sexual dimorphism in a number of anthropometric measures at birth and in utero. These sex differences are important determinants of body size and shape. In a low risk population delivering at term, body shape was largely determined by proportionality between anthropometric measures. The low correlations between antenatal measures and birth size suggest that it is unwise to ascribe birth shape phenotypes to adverse events at any particular stage of gestation. The weak relationship also suggests that routine antenatal scans around 30 wk of gestation to predict growth problems are unlikely to be of benefit in the majority of cases.

Growth and proportionality in early childhood. I. Within population variations

Investigation of Character Patterns of Early Growth in Infants with Different Birth Weights

Growth and proportionality in early childhood. II. Some population differences

Growth and proportionality in early childhood. III. Differences between babies of low birthweight in well-nourished and malnourished populations

Growth Status of Full-Term Infants with Different Sizes for Gestational Age During the First Year of Life

Growth of Infants and Young Children Born Small for Gestational Age: Growth Restriction Accompanied by Overweight

Growth patterns by birth size of preterm children born at 24–29 gestational weeks for the first 3 years

Intrauterine growth and its relationship to size and shape at birth

Childhood Growth Trajectories of Etiological Subgroups of Large for Gestational Age Newborns.

Growth trajectory of full-term small-for-gestational-age infants: a 3-year longitudinal study in China

Associations between prepregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain and weight catch-up in small-for-gestational-age children

Growth patterns of preterm and small for gestational age children during the first 10 years of life

Anthropometry as a tool for measuring malnutrition: impact of the new WHO growth standards and reference

An examination of factors that influence infant growth in the first weeks of life

The association of intrauterine and postnatal growth patterns and nutritional status with toddler body composition

Childhood Health Outcomes in Term, Large-for-Gestational-Age Babies with Different Postnatal Growth Patterns.

Growth and Eating Behaviours at 2 Years Corrected Age in Extremely Low-Birthweight Babies; Secondary Cohort Analysis from the ProVIDe Trial

Infants Born Large-for-gestational-age Display Slower Growth in Early Infancy, but No Epigenetic Changes at Birth

Different Catch-Up Growth Patterns in Very Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants

Infant growth by INTERGROWTH‐21st and Fenton Growth Charts: Predicting 1‐year anthropometry in South African preterm infants

The Optimal Postnatal Growth Trajectory for Term Small for Gestational Age Babies: A Prospective Cohort Study