DP05 (P061) Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinomas: challenges in diagnosis and management

Amy Cunliffe,Somaia Elsheikh,Sunita Odedra,Sandeep Varma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.227
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinomas (SEDCs) are rare adnexal carcinomas displaying both squamous and duct differentiation. We wish to remind clinicians of these recently described cancers, which can have aggressive behaviour (van der Horst MPJ, Garcia-Herrera A, Markiewicz D et al. Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2016; 40: 755–60). We identified five cases in our department: four female patients and one male. All lesions developed on the face, in patients aged 69–83 years. The majority developed over one to several years, apart from one rapidly growing lesion, and measured between 5 and 40 mm. Clinical examination suggested squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in two cases and basal cell carcinoma in three cases due to features such as puckering, rolled borders, telangiectasia, shine, ulceration and crust. Punch biopsies were performed in all five lesions; however, histological diagnosis of SEDC was suggested in only two. One of these patients underwent Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), which successfully cleared the lesion after two stages. The second patient, diagnosed on biopsy, had a large 30-mm lesion with invasion into the lacrimal sac and left nasal bone. The patient opted for palliative radiotherapy rather than extensive surgery and subsequently developed a left-cheek metastasis and symptoms suggestive of metastatic disease. Three of our cases were diagnosed after wide local excision (WLE) based on the histological and immunological features. The punch biopsies had suggested either SCC or adenosquamous/adnexal infiltrative carcinoma. One of these patients required adjuvant radiotherapy due to perineural involvement (< 0.1 mm). The other two cases were incompletely excised on WLE and the patients were offered further surgery or radiotherapy. Histologically these lesions were poorly defined infiltrative neoplasms consisting of atypical squamoid cells extending into the deep dermis or subcutaneous tissue with ductal differentiation, pronounced cytological atypia and associated desmoplastic stroma. Tumour thickness measured 3–10.3 mm. Immunohistochemistry was positive for CK7, AE1/AE3, CK5/6, p63, CAM5.2, carcinoembryonic antigen and epithelial membrane antigen. These five cases highlight the challenges faced in the diagnosis of SEDC for both the dermatologist and the dermatopathologist. MMS is recommended (Lim MM, Macdonald JA. Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma: treatment and outcomes. Am J Dermatopathol 2022; 44: 249–53) and lesions misdiagnosed as SCC may receive less effective treatment; our three patients who underwent WLE have required further interventions. We also report one patient with locally aggressive and likely metastatic disease. Patients with SEDC benefit from early diagnosis, MMS and close follow-up to reduce the risk of recurrence and improve patient outcomes.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?