The E¤ect of the Amended Divorce Law in China
Ang Sun,Yaohui Zhao
2012-01-01
Abstract:This paper explores whether and to what extent the relative circumstances of men and women following marital dissolution a¤ect sex-selection behavior within marriages. Chinas new divorce law, which was enacted in 2001, reduced divorce costs, especially for women, by granting the right to divorce and claim damages in the cases of domestic violence and extra-marital relationships and by securing womens property rights upon divorce. We model the legal change as a decrease in womens divorce costs in a household in which the spouses have nontransferable utility, and all the marital surplus accrues to the husband. We show that the new law results in fewer sex-selective abortions for the second pregnancy if the
rst pregnancy produced a daughter, and that the sex ratio should decline the most in historically low-divorce-rate regions. Both predictions are consistent with the empirical evidence, and the spatial variations in the decline of the sex ratio helps rule out concomitant changes in household income and relative returns to male and female children. With a Di¤erence-In-Di¤erence approach, we also
nd that women with a later
rst pregnancy, which increases the health-related costs of performing sex-selective abortions, are more responsive to the changes in the divorce law. In addition, we perform an exercise of "timing regression discontinuity" to separate the e¤ect of the divorce law from that of other policy changes; examine the outcomes of induced abortions and birth spacing to address the concern about underreporting of female births; and explore the changes in household consumption, which show a pattern consistent with the increase in womens position within households. Keywords: Intra-household Allocation; Divorce Law; Missing Women. JEL: D1, D13, J12, J13. Ang Sun thanks Andrew Foster for guidance and support. We thank Anna Aizer, Vernon Henderson, Sriniketh Nagavarapu, Nancy Qian, Anja Sautmann for their very helpful suggestions on earlier versions of this paper. We also thank Loren Brandt, Matthias Doepke, Esther Duo, Erica Field, Leigh Linden, Kaivan Munshi, Louis Putterman and Yang Yao for their comments, as well as participants at the Applied Micro Lunch, Race and Inequality workshop at Brown University, NEUDC 2010, RES 2011, 2011 North American Summer Meeting of the Econometric Society, 2011 Annual Paci
c Conference for Development Economics, for useful comments. All mistakes are our own. yCorresponding author : asun1@stanford.edu. Stanford University. zNational School of Development, Peking University