Abstract:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common, preventable and treatable health condition. COPD is associated with substantial burden on morbidity, mortality and healthcare resources. To review existing evidence for educational interventions delivered to health professionals managing COPD in the primary care setting. We searched the Cochrane Airways Trials Register from inception to May 2021. The Register includes records from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) and PsycINFO. We also searched online trial registries and reference lists of included studies. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster‐RCTs. Eligible studies tested educational interventions aimed at any health professionals involved in the management of COPD in primary care. Educational interventions were defined as interventions aimed at upskilling, improving or refreshing existing knowledge of health professionals in the diagnosis and management of COPD. Two review authors independently reviewed abstracts and full texts of eligible studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. We conducted meta‐analyses where possible and used random‐effects models to yield summary estimates of effect (mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)). We performed narrative synthesis when meta‐analysis was not possible. We assessed the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Primary outcomes were: 1) proportion of COPD diagnoses confirmed with spirometry; 2) proportion of patients with COPD referred to, participating in or completing pulmonary rehabilitation; and 3) proportion of patients with COPD prescribed respiratory medication consistent with guideline recommendations. We identified 38 studies(22 cluster‐RCTs and 16 RCTs) involving 4936 health professionals (reported in 19/38 studies) and 71,085 patient participants (reported in 25/38 studies). Thirty‐six included studies evaluated interventions versus usual care; seven studies also reported a comparison between two or more interventions as part of a three‐ to five‐arm RCT design. A range of simple to complex interventions were used across the studies, with common intervention features including education provided to health professionals via training sessions, workshops or online modules (31 studies), provision of practice support tools, tool kits and/or algorithms (10 studies), provision of guidelines (nine studies) and training on spirometry (five studies). Health professionals targeted by the interventions were most commonly general practitioners alone (20 studies) or in combination with nurses or allied health professionals (eight studies), and the majority of studies were conducted in general practice clinics. We identified performance bias as high risk for 33 studies. We also noted risk of selection, detection, attrition and reporting biases, although to a varying extent across studies. The evidence of efficacy was equivocal for all the three primary endpoints evaluated: 1) proportion of COPD diagnoses confirmed with spirometry (of the four studies that reported this outcome, two supported the intervention); 2) proportion of patients with COPD who are referred to, participate in or complete pulmonary rehabilitation (of the four studies that reported this outcome, two supported the intervention); and 3) proportion of patients with COPD prescribed respiratory medications consistent with guideline recommendations (12 studies reported this outcome, the majority evaluated multiple drug classes and reported a mixed effect). Additionally, the low quality of evidence and potential risk of bias make the interpretation more difficult. Moderate‐quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias concerns) suggests that educational interventions for health professionals probably improve the proportion of patients with COPD vaccinated against influenza (three studies) and probably have little impact on the proportion of patients vaccinated against pneumococcal infection (two studies). Low‐quality evidence suggests that educational interventions for health professionals may have little or no impact on the frequency of COPD exacerbations (10 studies). There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the reporting of health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Low‐quality evidence suggests that educational interventions for health professionals may have little or no impact on HRQoL overall, and when using the COPD‐specific HRQoL instrument, the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (at six months MD 0.87, 95% CI ‐2.51 to 4.26; 2 studies, 406 participants, and at 12 months MD ‐0.43, 95% CI ‐1.52 to 0.67, 4 studies, 1646 participants; reduction in score indic -Abstract Truncated-

Best practice in COPD care: a health equity approach

Expanding nurse practice in COPD: is it key to providing high quality, effective and safe patient care?

Managing COPD exacerbations in primary care

Addressing Barriers to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Care: Three Innovative Evidence-Based Approaches: A Review

Which chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care recommendations have low implementation and why? A pilot study

COPD care delivery pathways in five European Union countries: mapping and health care professionals' perceptions

Provision of palliative care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a narrative review

Mapping the Common Barriers to Optimal COPD Care in High and Middle-Income Countries: Qualitative Perspectives from Clinicians

An overview of prescribing practice and non-pharmacological treatments in COPD

Exploring Factors Contributing to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Guideline Non-Adherence and Potential Solutions in the Emergency Department: Interdisciplinary Staff Perspective

Primary care for people with severe mental illness and comorbid obstructive airways disease: a qualitative study of patient perspectives with integrated stakeholder feedback

The Cascade of Care in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.

Engaging stakeholders to level up COPD care in LMICs: lessons learned from the "Breathe Well" programme in Brazil, China, Georgia, and North Macedonia

Educating frontline health workers to support evidence-based management and treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A literature review

Patterns of care in the management of high-risk COPD in the US (2011-2019): an observational study for the CONQUEST quality improvement program

Investigating the rationale for COPD maintenance therapy prescription across Europe, findings from a multi-country study

Cluster randomised controlled trial of specialist-led integrated COPD care (INTEGR COPD)

Implementing integrated care guidelines in asthma and COPD: It ain't easy!

Advances in the Understanding and Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Variations in COPD Health Care Access and Outcomes: A Rapid Review