Abstract:Objectives: After a panel process, recommendations on the use of sutureless and rapid deployment valves in aortic valve replacement were given with special respect as an alternative to stented valves. Methods: Thirty-one international experts in both sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprostheses constituted the panel. After a thorough literature review, evidence-based recommendations were rated in a three-step modified Delphi approach by the experts. Results: Literature research could identify 67 clinical trials, 4 guidelines and 10 systematic reviews for detailed text analysis to obtain a total of 28 recommendations. After rating by the experts, 12 recommendations were identified and degree of consensus for each was determined. Proctoring and education are necessary for the introduction of sutureless valves on an institutional basis as well as for the individual training of surgeons. Sutureless and rapid deployment should be considered as the valve prosthesis of first choice for isolated procedures in patients with comorbidities, old age, delicate aortic wall conditions such as calcified root, porcelain aorta or prior implantation of aortic homograft and stentless valves as well as for concomitant procedures and small aortic roots to reduce cross-clamp time. Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography is highly recommended, and in case of right anterior thoracotomy, preoperative computer tomography is strongly recommended. Suitable annular sizes are 19-27 mm. There is a contraindication for bicuspid valves only for Type 0 and for annular abscess or destruction due to infective endocarditis. Careful but complete decalcification of the aortic root is recommended to avoid paravalvular leakage; extensive decalcification should be avoided not to create annular defects. Proximal anastomoses of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting should be placed during a single aortic cross-clamp period or alternatively with careful side clamping. Available evidence suggests that the use of sutureless and rapid deployment valve is associated with (can translate into) reduced early complications such as prolonged ventilation, blood transfusion, atrial fibrillation, pleural effusions and renal replacement therapy, respectively, and may result in reduced intensive care unit and hospital stay in comparison with traditional valves. Conclusion: The international experts recommend various benefits of sutureless and rapid deployment technology, which may represent a helpful tool in aortic valve replacement for patients requiring a biological valve. However, further evidence will be needed to reaffirm the benefit of sutureless and rapid deployment valves.

Efficacy of a sutureless aortic valve-reoperative alternative to a composite graft replacement

Utilizing a sutureless valve for prosthetic valve endocarditis after aortic root replacement

Modified bio-Bentall procedure: 10-year experience

Early surgical outcomes in the composite-valve root replacement with bioprosthesis after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Beating aortic valve replacement surgery as an alternative to transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a patient with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction

Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Perimount sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective, propensity-matched study

Innovative combined Ozaki and Bentall procedures for aortic root replacement

Sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprosthesis in aortic valve replacement: recommendations of an International Expert Consensus Panel

Aortic valve replacement in elderly with small aortic root and low body surface area; the Perceval S valve and its impact in effective orifice area

Early Clinical Experiences of Robotic Assisted Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Valve Stenosis with Sutureless Aortic Valve

Valve In Valve Transaortic Valve Replacement (ViV-TAVR) in a Patient with Recurrent Pulmonary Edema: A Novel Procedure That Could Be Effective and Life-Saving in High-Risk Patients

[Aortic valve repair surgery: a historical review, current analysis, and future prospects]

Aortic Root Reconstruction in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Comparison of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Reimplantation Versus Composite Replacement

Transcatheter Aortic Valve In Valve Implantation In Severe Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Disfunction After Bioprosthetic Bentall Operation: The Valve To Coronary Problem

Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration

One-stage aortic replacement for type A aortic dissection: using a Vasoring and a conventional elephant trunk graft

Aortic valve replacement after previous TAVI

Long-term Results of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortic valve dysfunction does not impair survival rates

Early and late experience of the modified aortic reimplantation operation

Safety and Efficacy of Two-Port Thoracoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement