Abstract:Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is an advanced imaging application for breast cancer detection, which makes use of a number of 2D X-ray projection images over a limited angular range to reconstruct quasi 3D reconstruction images. As such, first an introduction to digital X-ray tomosynthesis is given, after which existing limited angle tomosynthesis methods are presented. In the next section DBT geometry and its development to date is discussed. Details are given on geometries currently available from different manufacturers, and recent advances. Part of this section presents the available relevant reconstruction methods. Next, we look into the DBT detectors and their performance evaluation. Current DBT detectors are based on amorphous silicon (a-Si) and amorphous selenium (a-Se) thin film transistor (TFT) technology. However, complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) active pixel sensor (APS) digital X-ray detectors have the potential to replace a-Si:H TFT detectors in DBT in the near future, due to a smaller pixel pitch, low electronic noise, faster frame rate and negligible image lag. The performance of current DBT detectors is evaluated mainly by: automatic exposure control performance, response function, noise analysis, detector element failure, and system projection modulation transfer function (MTF). Following this we discuss image quality measurements, because they are essential for the evaluation and optimization of DBT systems. They should represent relevant clinical tasks, such as the detection of microcalcifications and masses in mammographic backgrounds. Currently the CDMAM phantom is used for contrast-detail analysis (i.e., the required threshold contrast to detect discs of various diameters) of the reconstructed images. The TOR MAM phantom can also be used to score the visualization of discs, filaments and specks for various contrast levels. The parameter Z-resolution is used to assess the inter-plane spread of reconstruction artifacts associated with 1 mm diameter aluminum spheres (contained in a specific three-dimensional phantom). Furthermore, the system MTF in the x–y plane is used to take into account all sources of blurring in the DBT system: detector MTF, additional sources of unsharpness and the reconstruction algorithm. The final part of the chapter describes image simulation methods for DBT optimization. Briefly, DBT is currently under consideration for its use in breast cancer screening in Europe, in combination with 2D mammography or alone. Several parameters (such as image acquisition parameters, detector response, system geometry, radiation dose, and image processing and reconstruction algorithms) are studied for their effect on image quality and the investigation of the optimum use of DBT. Traditionally, large clinical trials are required to evaluate these parameters over a large number of women. Such trials are time consuming, expensive and require irradiating asymptomatic women. Alternatively, several research groups use virtual clinical trials (based on image simulation methods) to optimize DBT parameters in fast, radiation-free, and cost-effective ways. This part of the chapter reviews several simulation methods in DBT and the applications in evaluating its effectiveness.

Our journey toward implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Project

Assessing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Impact on Early Cancer Detection: Insights from Consecutive Screening

Introduction of one-view tomosynthesis in population-based mammography screening: Impact on detection rate, interval cancer rate and false-positive rate

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Systems, Characterization and Simulation

The Transformative Power of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: an ethical perspective

Effectiveness of hybrid digital breast tomosynthesis/digital mammography compared to digital mammography in women presenting for routine screening at Maroondah BreastScreen: Study protocol for a co-designed, non-randomised prospective trial

Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised images versus standard full-field digital mammography in population-based screening (TOSYMA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Breast Cancers Detected during a Decade of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Comparison with Digital Mammography

Cost differences between digital tomosynthesis and standard digital mammography in a breast cancer screening programme: results from the To-Be trial in Norway

Feasibility study comparing synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography for simulated first round screening in a single BreastScreen NSW centre

Organizational impact of systemic implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis as a primary test for breast cancer screening in Italy

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Improves Early Breast Cancer Detection and Survival in Taiwan

Adaptation of a deep learning malignancy model from full-field digital mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis

Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis plus synthetic mammography versus full‐field digital mammography with or without tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography in Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging

Comparing accuracy of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography or synthetic 2D mammography in breast cancer screening: baseline results of the MAITA RCT consortium

Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis systems: comparison of current virtual clinical trial methods

Applications of Advanced Breast Imaging Modalities