SPI1+CD68+ macrophages as a biomarker for gastric cancer metastasis: a rationale for combined antiangiogenic and immunotherapy strategies

Guofei Deng,Pengliang Wang,Rishun Su,Xuezeng Sun,Zizhen Wu,Zhangsen Huang,Liang Gu,Hong Yu,Zhenzhen Zhao,Yulong He,Mingyu Huo,Changhua Zhang,Songcheng Yin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-009983
2024-10-24
Abstract:Background: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have been demonstrated to be associated with tumor progression. However, the different subpopulations of TAMs and their roles in gastric cancer (GC) remain poorly understood. This study aims to assess the effects of Spi-1 proto-oncogene (SPI1)+CD68+ TAMs in GC. Methods: The distribution of SPI1+CD68+ TAMs in GC tissue was estimated by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry. Single-cell transcriptome analysis and multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry were applied to explore the role of SPI1+CD68+ TAMs in an immune contexture. SPI1 overexpression or knockdown cells were constructed to evaluate its role in macrophage polarization and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation was used to verify the mechanism of SPI1 transcriptional function. The effect of combined antiangiogenic and immunotherapy was further validated using mouse peritoneal metastasis models. Results: Single-cell transcriptome analysis and immunohistochemistry demonstrated that SPI1 was expressed in macrophages, with a higher enrichment in metastatic lesions than in primary tumors. Higher SPI1+CD68+ TAMs infiltration was associated with poor overall survival. Mechanically, SPI1 promoted the M2-type macrophage polarization. SPI1 could bind to the promoter of vascular endothelial growth factor A and facilitate angiogenesis. Moreover, the level of SPI1+CD68+ TAMs infiltration was closely related to the efficacy of immunotherapy, especially when combined with antiangiogenic therapy. Conclusions: The present study showed that SPI1+CD68+ TAMs are a promising biomarker for predicting prognosis, antiangiogenic drug sensitivity, and combination target of immunotherapy in patients with GC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?