Structure of diene-phosphonous dihalide addition products and of derived phospholenes and phospholene oxides.

L. D. Quin,J. P. Gratz,T. P. Barket

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/JO01267A020

1968-03-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Methods to promote equity in health resource allocation in low- and middle-income countries: an overview

James Love-Koh,Susan Griffin,Edward Kataika,Paul Revill,Sibusiso Sibandze,Simon Walker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0537-z

2020-01-13

Globalization and Health

Abstract:Abstract Unfair differences in healthcare access, utilisation, quality or health outcomes exist between and within countries around the world. Improving health equity is a stated objective for many governments and international organizations. We provide an overview of the major tools that have been developed to measure, evaluate and promote health equity, along with the data required to operationalise them. Methods are organised into four key policy questions facing decision-makers: (i) what is the current level of inequity in health; (ii) does government health expenditure benefit the worst-off; (iii) can government health expenditure more effectively promote equity; and (iv) which interventions provide the best value for money in reducing inequity. Benefit incidence analysis can be used to estimate the distribution of current public health sector expenditure, with geographical resource allocation formulae and health system reform being the main government policy levers for improving equity. Techniques from the economic evaluation literature, such as extended and distributional cost-effectiveness analysis can be used to identify ‘best buy’ interventions from a health equity perspective. A range of inequality metrics, from gap measures and slope indices to concentration indices and regression analysis, can be applied to these approaches to evaluate changes in equity. Methods from the economics literature can provide policymakers with a toolkit for addressing multiple aspects of health equity, from outcomes to financial protection, and can be adapted to accommodate data commonly available in low- and middle-income settings.

public, environmental & occupational health
Policy Approaches to Address the Social and Environmental Determinants of Health Inequity in Asia-Pacific

Sharon Friel,Belinda Loring,Narongsakdi Aungkasuvapala,Fran Baum,Alison Blaiklock,Tung-Liang Chiang,Youngtae Cho,Paison Dakulala,Yan Guo,Hideki Hashimoto,Kellie Horton,Saroj Jayasinghe,Don Matheson,Huong Thanh Nguyen,Caleb Otto,Mala Rao,Paaparangi Reid,Charles Surjadi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539512460569

2012-01-01

Abstract:Asia Pacific is home to over 60% of the world’s population and the fastest growing economies. Many of the leadership in the Asia Pacific region is becoming increasingly aware that improving the conditions for health would go a long way to sustaining economic prosperity in the region, as well as improving global and local health equity. There is no biological reason why males born in Cambodia can expect to live 23 years less than males born in Japan, or why females born in Tuvalu live 23 years shorter than females in New Zealand or why non-Indigenous Australian males live 12 years longer than Indigenous men. The nature and drivers of health inequities vary greatly among different social, cultural and geo-political contexts and effective solutions must take this into account. This paper utilizes the CSDH global recommendations as a basis for looking at the actions that are taking place to address the structural drivers and conditions of daily living that affect health inequities in the Asia Pacific context. While there are signs of action and hope, substantial challenges remain for health equity in Asia Pacific. The gains that have been made to date are not equally distributed and may be unsustainable as the world encounters new economic, social and environmental challenges. Tackling health inequities is a political imperative that requires leadership, political courage, social action, a sound evidence base and progressive public policy.
Reconstructing Damaged Complex Networks Based on Neural Networks

Yedam Lee,I. Sohn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9120310

2017-12-09

Symmetry

Abstract:Despite recent progress in the study of complex systems, reconstruction of damaged networks due to random and targeted attack has not been addressed before. In this paper, we formulate the network reconstruction problem as an identification of network structure based on much reduced link information. Furthermore, a novel method based on multilayer perceptron neural network is proposed as a solution to the problem of network reconstruction. Based on simulation results, it was demonstrated that the proposed scheme achieves very high reconstruction accuracy in small-world network model and a robust performance in scale-free network model.
Health Equity and COVID-19: Global Perspectives.

Efrat Shadmi,Yingyao Chen,Inês Dourado,Inbal Faran-Perach,John Furler,Peter Hangoma,Piya Hanvoravongchai,Claudia Obando,Varduhi Petrosyan,Krishna D. Rao,Ana Lorena Ruano,Leiyu Shi,Luis Eugenio de Souza,Sivan Spitzer-Shohat,Elizabeth Sturgiss,Rapeepong Suphanchaimat,Manuela Villar Uribe,Sara Willems

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01218-z

2020-01-01

International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract:The COVID-19 is disproportionally affecting the poor, minorities and a broad range of vulnerable populations, due to its inequitable spread in areas of dense population and limited mitigation capacity due to high prevalence of chronic conditions or poor access to high quality public health and medical care. Moreover, the collateral effects of the pandemic due to the global economic downturn, and social isolation and movement restriction measures, are unequally affecting those in the lowest power strata of societies. To address the challenges to health equity and describe some of the approaches taken by governments and local organizations, we have compiled 13 country case studies from various regions around the world: China, Brazil, Thailand, Sub Saharan Africa, Nicaragua, Armenia, India, Guatemala, United States of America (USA), Israel, Australia, Colombia, and Belgium. This compilation is by no-means representative or all inclusive, and we encourage researchers to continue advancing global knowledge on COVID-19 health equity related issues, through rigorous research and generation of a strong evidence base of new empirical studies in this field.
Equity in health and healthcare in Malawi: analysis of trends

Eyob Zere,Matshidiso Moeti,Joses Kirigia,Takondwa Mwase,Edward Kataika

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-78

IF: 4.5

2007-05-15

BMC Public Health

Abstract:BackgroundGrowing scientific evidence points to the pervasiveness of inequities in health and health care and the persistence of the inverse care law, that is the availability of good quality healthcare seems to be inversely related to the need for it in developing countries. Achievement of the Millennium Development Goals is likely to be compromised if inequities in health/healthcare are not properly addressed.ObjectiveThis study attempts to assess trends in inequities in selected indicators of health status and health service utilization in Malawi using data from the Demographic and Health Surveys of 1992, 2000 and 2004.MethodsData from Demographic and Health Surveys of 1992, 2000 and 2004 are analysed for inequities in health/healthcare using quintile ratios and concentration curves/indices.ResultsOverall, the findings indicate that in most of the selected indicators there are pro-rich inequities and that they have been widening during the period under consideration. Furthermore, vertical inequities are observed in the use of interventions (treatment of diarrhoea, ARI among under-five children), in that the non-poor who experience less burden from these diseases receive more of the treatment/interventions, whereas the poor who have a greater proportion of the disease burden use less of the interventions. It is also observed that the publicly provided services for some of the selected interventions (e.g. child delivery) benefit the non-poor more than the poor.ConclusionThe widening trend in inequities, in particular healthcare utilization for proven cost-effective interventions is likely to jeopardize the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals and other national and regional targets. To counteract the inequities it is recommended that coverage in poor communities be increased through appropriate targeting mechanisms and effective service delivery strategies. There is also a need for studies to identify which service delivery mechanisms are effective in the Malawian context.

public, environmental & occupational health
Progress Towards Health Equity in Vietnam: Evidence from Nationwide Official Health Statistics, 2010-2020

Yikai Feng,Tran Diep Tuan,Junyi Shi,Zhuo Li,Mailikezhati Maimaitiming,Yinzi Jin,Zhijie Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014739

IF: 8.056

2024-01-01

BMJ Global Health

Abstract:IntroductionOne of the ultimate goals of strengthening the health system is to achieve health equity. Vietnam is considered one of the ‘fast-track countries’ to achieve the health-related Millennium Development Goals, but research on its equity strategies remains inadequate.MethodsUsing Vietnamese official health statistics, we investigated inequity in four dimensions including health resources, service delivery, service utilisation and residents’ health status from the perspectives of income levels, poverty rates and subnational regions. The Slope Index of Inequality, concentration curve/Concentration Index, absolute difference and Theil Index were used.ResultsFour indicators showed ‘pro-poor’ inequality in health resources, including the per capita health budget, per capita health personnel, per capita health personnel at the community level and per capita hospital beds at the community level, while provincial hospital beds showed ‘pro-rich’ inequality. Two health service delivery indicators (delivery of antenatal care ≥3 times and proportion of community health service centres with medical doctors) show ‘pro-rich’ inequality, although two health status indicators, mortality and malnutrition rates for children under five, showed ‘pro-poor’ inequality. The Northern Midlands and Mountain Areas, and the Central Highlands were disadvantaged regarding service delivery and health status. Intraregional differences were the main factors contributing to the inequalities in delivery of antenatal care ≥3 times, provincial hospital beds and percentage of community health centres with medical doctors, with the Red River Delta and the South East region experiencing the greatest inequalities.ConclusionThe overall level of health equity in Vietnam has increased over the past decade, although inequality in health service delivery has hindered progress towards health equity based on income, poverty and subnational regions. Targeted policies need to be introduced to reduce inequities relating to the health workforce and service delivery capacity.
Paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation is associated with an abnormal atrial substrate: characterizing the "second factor".

M. Stiles,B. John,Christopher X. Wong,P. Kuklik,A. Brooks,D. Lau,H. Dimitri,K. Roberts‐Thomson,L. Wilson,Paolo De Sciscio,G. Young,P. Sanders

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.054

IF: 24

2009-04-07

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract:
Achieving equity within universal health coverage: a narrative review of progress and resources for measuring success

Anna M Rodney,Peter S Hill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0072-8

2014-10-10

International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract:IntroductionEquity should be implicit within universal health coverage (UHC) however, emerging evidence is showing that without adequate focus on measurement of equity, vulnerable populations may continue to receive inadequate or inferior health care. This study undertakes a narrative review which aims to: (i) elucidate how equity is contextualised and measured within UHC, and (ii) describe tools, resources and lessons which will assist decision makers to plan and implement UHC programmes which ensure equity for all.MethodsA narrative review of peer-reviewed literature published in English between 2005 and 2013, retrieved from PubMed via the search words, `universal health coverage/care’ and `equity/inequity’ was performed. Websites of key global health organizations were also searched for relevant grey literature. Papers were excluded if they failed to focus on equity (of access, financial risk protection or health outcomes) as well as focusing on one of the following: (i) the impact of UHC programmes, policies or interventions on equity (ii) indicators, measurement, monitoring and/or evaluation of equity within UHC, or (iii) tools or resources to assist with measurement.ResultsEighteen journal articles consisting mostly of secondary analysis of country data and qualitative case studies in the form of commentaries/reviews, and 13 items of grey literature, consisting largely of reports from working groups and expert meetings focusing on defining, understanding and measuring inequity in UHC (including recent drafts of global/country monitoring frameworks) were included.DiscussionThe literature advocates for progressive universalism addressing monetary and non-monetary barriers to access and strengthening existing health systems. This however relies on countries being effectively able to identify and reach disadvantaged populations and estimate unmet need. Countries should assess the new WHO/WB-proposed framework for its ability to adequately track the progress of disadvantaged populations in terms of achieving equitable access, effective coverage and financial risk protection within their own settings.ConclusionsRecently published resources contextualise equity as a measurable component of UHC and propose several useful indicators and frameworks. Country case-studies also provide useful lessons and recommendations for planning and implementing equitable UHC which will assist other countries to consider their own requirements for UHC monitoring and evaluation.

public, environmental & occupational health
Equity and coverage in RMNCH health interventions by ethnicity, 2004- 2018: lessons learned from integral policies in Ecuador

Paulina Belen Rios-Quituizaca,Leonardo dos Santos Ferreira,Jesus Vinicio Endara-Mina,Nancy Armenta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.04.24314912

2024-10-06

Abstract:Introduction: In Latin America, ethnic disparities rooted in the colonial legacy have persisted. There is limited scientific evidence critically analyzing the temporal changes in ethnic inequalities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal, and child health (RMNCH), and the potential impact of policies on the progress of reducing these gaps for Indigenous peoples. After the 2000 crisis, Ecuador had the region's largest ethnic disparities in intervention coverage and social determinants due to structural racism. Inclusion policies improved starting in 2008. The main study aim was to analyze the coverage and ethnic inequalities of six RMNCH health interventions, the evolution of social determinants, and the potential impact of policies and strategies over 14 years. Methods: using a mixed method design, we analyze three nationally representative surveys (2004, 2012, and 2018) to compare the evolution of social determinants; and the coverage and inequalities of six RMNCH health interventions, stratified by ethnicity (women and child Indigenous, Afro-Ecuadorians, and reference group); and we estimated absolute inequality measures and adjusted coverage ratios using Poisson regression models. Through a literature review and temporal graphs, we analyzed plans, policies, and strategies in health, education, and ethnic inclusion during the same period to estimate their potential impact. Results: By 2018, the population self-identifying as Indigenous had doubled the percentage of people in the 4th and 5th wealth quintiles (from 10% to 20%) and increased secondary education attainment from 25% to 45% compared to 2004, though these changes were less evident in rural areas. Between 2004 and 2018, prenatal care coverage, institutional delivery care, and births attended by professionals increased from 27% to 75% among the Indigenous population. Although the coverage ratios show that ethnic gaps persist, inequalities progressively reduced during this period. These reductions coincided with efforts of social participation and organization that led to the constitutional recognition of pluractionality, combined with increased social investment in education and health in rural areas, and the development and implementation of policies and strategies that promoted intercultural practices in health. However, there is a noted lack of monitoring processes and impact assessment of these strategies. Conclusions: The reduction of ethnic inequalities in RMNCH in Ecuador could be explained by inclusive policies and programs implemented in recent years, social organization and participation, and the involvement of actors and leaders in the implementation of these. Temporal studies based on routine surveys allow for the observation of changes and analysis of the potential impact of policies and strategies. Ecuador exemplifies actions that may have contributed to the reduction of inequalities, which could serve as a reference for other countries seeking to improve the health of Indigenous peoples. These observations also provide a pre-pandemic image, offering insights prior to the potential effects of COVID-19 and five years before assessing the outcomes of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Sexual and Reproductive Health
How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions.

Vivian Welch,Omar Dewidar,Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu,Salman Abdisalam,Abdulah Al Ameer,Victoria I Barbeau,Kevin Brand,Kisanet Kebedom,Maria Benkhalti,Elizabeth Kristjansson,Mohamad Tarek Madani,Alba M Antequera Martín,Christine M Mathew,Jessie McGowan,William McLeod,Hanbyoul Agatha Park,Jennifer Petkovic,Alison Riddle,Peter Tugwell,Mark Petticrew,Jessica Trawin,George A Wells

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000028.pub3

IF: 8.4

2022-01-20

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract:Enhancing health equity is endorsed in the Sustainable Development Goals. The failure of systematic reviews to consider potential differences in effects across equity factors is cited by decision‐makers as a limitation to their ability to inform policy and program decisions. To explore what methods systematic reviewers use to consider health equity in systematic reviews of effectiveness. We searched the following databases up to 26 February 2021: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Methodology Register, CINAHL, Education Resources Information Center, Education s, Criminal Justice s, Hein Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals, PAIS International, Social Services s, Sociological s, Digital Dissertations and the Health Technology Assessment Database. We searched SCOPUS to identify articles that cited any of the included studies on 10 June 10 2021. We contacted authors and searched the reference lists of included studies to identify additional potentially relevant studies. We included empirical studies of cohorts of systematic reviews that assessed methods for measuring effects on health inequalities. We define health inequalities as unfair and avoidable differences across socially stratifying factors that limit opportunities for health. We operationalised this by assessing studies which evaluated differences in health across any component of the PROGRESS‐Plus acronym, which stands for Place of residence, Race/ethnicity/culture/language, Occupation, Gender or sex, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital. "Plus" stands for other factors associated with discrimination, exclusion, marginalisation or vulnerability such as personal characteristics (e.g. age, disability), relationships that limit opportunities for health (e.g. children in a household with parents who smoke) or environmental situations which provide limited control of opportunities for health (e.g. school food environment). Two review authors independently extracted data using a pre‐tested form. Risk of bias was appraised for included studies according to the potential for bias in selection and detection of systematic reviews. In total, 48,814 studies were identified and the titles and abstracts were screened in duplicate. In this updated review, we identified an additional 124 methodological studies published in the 10 years since the first version of this review, which included 34 studies. Thus, 158 methodological studies met our criteria for inclusion. The methods used by these studies focused on evidence relevant to populations experiencing health inequity (108 out of 158 studies), assess subgroup analysis across PROGRESS‐Plus (26 out of 158 studies), assess analysis of a gradient in effect across PROGRESS‐Plus (2 out of 158 studies) or use a combination of subgroup analysis and focused approaches (20 out of 158 studies). The most common PROGRESS‐Plus factors assessed were age (43 studies), socioeconomic status in 35 studies, low‐ and middle‐income countries in 24 studies, gender or sex in 22 studies, race or ethnicity in 17 studies, and four studies assessed multiple factors across which health inequity may exist. Only 16 studies provided a definition of health inequity. Five methodological approaches to consider health equity in systematic reviews of effectiveness were identified: 1) descriptive assessment of reporting and analysis in systematic reviews (140 of 158 studies used a type of descriptive method); 2) descriptive assessment of reporting and analysis in original trials (50 studies); 3) analytic approaches which assessed differential effects across one or more PROGRESS‐Plus factors (16 studies); 4) applicability assessment (25 studies) and 5) stakeholder engagement (28 studies), which is a new finding in this update and examines the appraisal of whether relevant stakeholders with lived experience of health inequity were included in the design of systematic reviews or design and delivery of interventions. Reporting for both approaches (analytic and applicability) lacked transparency and was insufficiently detailed to enable the assessment of credibility. There is a need for improvement in conceptual clarity about the definition of health equity, describing sufficient detail about analytic approaches (including subgroup analyses) and transparent reporting of judgments required for applicability assessments in order to consider health equity in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Key message We found five methodological approaches to consider health equity in systematic reviews of effectiveness but the most appropriate way to address any of these approaches is unclear. Review question We reviewed the methods that systematic reviewers use to consider health equity in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Background Reducing health inequities, avoidable and unfair differences in health, has achieved international political importance and global en -Abstract Truncated-

medicine, general & internal
Advocacy for health equity: a synthesis review

Linden Farrer,Claudia Marinetti,Yoline Kuipers Cavaco,Caroline Costongs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12112

Abstract:POLICY POINTS: Many barriers hamper advocacy for health equity, including the contemporary economic zeitgeist, the biomedical health perspective, and difficulties cooperating across policy sectors on the issue. Effective advocacy should include persistent efforts to raise awareness and understanding of the social determinants of health. Education on the social determinants as part of medical training should be encouraged, including professional training within disadvantaged communities. Advocacy organizations have a central role in advocating for health equity given the challenges bridging the worlds of civil society, research, and policy. Context: Health inequalities are systematic differences in health among social groups that are caused by unequal exposure to-and distributions of-the social determinants of health (SDH). They are persistent between and within countries despite action to reduce them. Advocacy is a means of promoting policies that improve health equity, but the literature on how to do so effectively is dispersed. The aim of this review is to synthesize the evidence in the academic and gray literature and to provide a body of knowledge for advocates to draw on to inform their efforts. Methods: This article is a systematic review of the academic literature and a fixed-length systematic search of the gray literature. After applying our inclusion criteria, we analyzed our findings according to our predefined dimensions of advocacy for health equity. Last, we synthesized our findings and made a critical appraisal of the literature. Findings: The policy world is complex, and scientific evidence is unlikely to be conclusive in making decisions. Timely qualitative, interdisciplinary, and mixed-methods research may be valuable in advocacy efforts. The potential impact of evidence can be increased by "packaging" it as part of knowledge transfer and translation. Increased contact between researchers and policymakers could improve the uptake of research in policy processes. Researchers can play a role in advocacy efforts, although health professionals and disadvantaged people, who have direct contact with or experience of hardship, can be particularly persuasive in advocacy efforts. Different types of advocacy messages can accompany evidence, but messages should be tailored to advocacy target. Several barriers hamper advocacy efforts. The most frequently cited in the academic literature are the current political and economic zeitgeist and related public opinion, which tend to blame disadvantaged people for their ill health, even though biomedical approaches to health and political short-termism also act as barriers. These barriers could be tackled through long-term actions to raise public awareness and understanding of the SDH and through training of health professionals in advocacy. Advocates need to take advantage of "windows of opportunity," which open and close quickly, and demonstrate expertise and credibility. Conclusions: This article brings together for the first time evidence from the academic and the gray literature and provides a building block for efforts to advocate for health equity. Evidence regarding many of the dimensions is scant, and additional research is merited, particularly concerning the applicability of findings outside the English-speaking world. Advocacy organizations have a central role in advocating for health equity, given the challenges bridging the worlds of civil society, research, and policy.
Inequity in the face of success: understanding geographic and wealth-based equity in success of facility-based delivery for under-5 mortality reduction in six countries

Jovial Thomas Ntawukuriryayo,Amelia VanderZanden,Alemayehu Amberbir,Alula Teklu,Fauzia Akhter Huda,Mahesh Maskey,Mohamadou Sall,Patricia J. Garcia,Raj Kumar Subedi,Felix Sayinzoga,Lisa R. Hirschhorn,Agnes Binagwaho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04387-2

2024-02-28

BMC Pediatrics

Abstract:Abstract Background Between 2000–2015, many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) implemented evidence-based interventions (EBIs) known to reduce under-5 mortality (U5M). Even among LMICs successful in reducing U5M, this drop was unequal subnationally, with varying success in EBI implementation. Building on mixed methods multi-case studies of six LMICs (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Nepal, Peru, Rwanda, and Senegal) leading in U5M reduction, we describe geographic and wealth-based equity in facility-based delivery (FBD), a critical EBI to reduce neonatal mortality which requires a trusted and functional health system, and compar e the implementation strategies and contextual factors which influenced success or challenges within and across the countries. Methods To obtain equity gaps in FBD coverage and changes in absolute geographic and wealth-based equity between 2000–2015, we calculated the difference between the highest and lowest FBD coverage across subnational regions and in the FBD coverage between the richest and poorest wealth quintiles. We extracted and compared contextual factors and implementation strategies associated with reduced or remaining inequities from the country case studies. Results The absolute geographic and wealth-based equity gaps decreased in three countries, with greatest drops in Rwanda – decreasing from 50 to 5% across subnational regions and from 43 to 13% across wealth quintiles. The largest increases were seen in Bangladesh – from 10 to 32% across geography – and in Ethiopia – from 22 to 58% across wealth quintiles. Facilitators to reducing equity gaps across the six countries included leadership commitment and culture of data use; in some countries, community or maternal and child health insurance was also an important factor (Rwanda and Peru). Barriers across all the countries included geography, while country-specific barriers included low female empowerment subnationally (Bangladesh) and cultural beliefs (Ethiopia). Successful strategies included building on community health worker (CHW) programs, with country-specific adaptation of pre-existing CHW programs (Rwanda, Ethiopia, and Senegal) and cultural adaptation of delivery protocols (Peru). Reducing delivery costs was successful in Senegal, and partially successful in Nepal and Ethiopia. Conclusion Variable success in reducing inequity in FBD coverage among countries successful in reducing U5M underscores the importance of measuring not just coverage but also equity. Learning from FBD interventions shows the need to prioritize equity in access and uptake of EBIs for the poor and in remote areas by adapting the strategies to local context.

pediatrics
Social Inclusion and Sustainable Development: Findings from Seven African and Asian Contexts

Ghazala Mir,Naureen Durrani,Rachel Julian,Yasah Kimei,Saidur Mashreky,T. T. Duong Doan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114859

IF: 3.9

2024-06-06

Sustainability

Abstract:Social inequities have widened divisions between diverse population groups. Inequity is associated with social exclusion, structural and physical violence and reduced development, which in turn are linked to civil unrest, conflict and adverse health and social outcomes. Public services are key institutions through which social inequities are created and maintained, but evidence on viable interventions to reduce institutional exclusion is limited for low- and middle-income (LMIC) contexts. We identify common drivers of institutional exclusion across diverse populations in LMICs and inclusion strategies that could potentially work across populations, public service sectors and country contexts. Seven studies engaged with over 385 key stakeholders in healthcare, education and local government settings in Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Myanmar, Nepal, Nigeria and Vietnam. Participatory research, in-depth interviews, policy reviews and multi-stakeholder workshops focused on a range of disadvantaged groups. A multi-sector partnership co-produced recommendations at each site. Findings were synthesised to identify common themes and a framework for social inclusion across disadvantaged populations. The invisibility of disadvantaged communities in public service planning and delivery processes helped maintain their exclusion from opportunities and resources. A spectrum of neglect, restrictions and discriminatory practice reflected structural violence linked to poor life chances, illness, physical abuse and death. Key recommendations include the representation of disadvantaged groups in service staffing and decision-making and the transformation of public service policy and practice to develop inclusive, targeted, collaborative and accountable systems.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Hepatitis C: many small steps.

H. Zaaijer

Abstract:
Health equity in Somalia? An evaluation of the progress made from 2006 to 2019 in reducing inequities in maternal and newborn health

Joana Morrison,Sk Md Mamunur Rahman Malik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-02092-1

2024-03-07

International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract:Every human being has the right to affordable, high-quality health services. However, mothers and children in wealthier households worldwide have better access to healthcare and lower mortality rates than those in lower-income ones. Despite Somalia's fragile health system and the under-5 mortality rate being among the highest worldwide, it has made progress in increasing reproductive, maternal, and child health care coverage. However, evidence suggests that not all groups have benefited equally. We analysed secondary 2006 and 2018–19 data to monitor disparities in reproductive, maternal, and child health care in Somalia.

public, environmental & occupational health
[Hormone receptors].

E. Milgrom,B. Desbuquois

Abstract:
Microcosm experiments can inform global ecological problems.

T. Benton,M. Solan,J. Travis,S. Sait

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TREE.2007.08.003

IF: 20.589

2007-10-01

Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract:
Freedom To Lead A Life We Have Reason To Value? A Spotlight On Health Inequity In The Asia Pacific Region

Sharon Friel,Tung-Liang Chiang,Youngtae Cho,Yan Guo,Hideki Hashimoto,Saroj Jayasinghe,Belinda Loring,Don Matheson,Huong Thanh Nguyen,Mala Rao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539511402053

2011-01-01

Abstract:The Asia Pacific region is home to more than 60% of the world's population. Life expectancy at birth differs between countries by as much as 27 years. This article suggests that asymmetric economic growth, unplanned urbanization, marked environmental change, unequal improvements in daily living conditions, and the unequal distribution and access to quality health care have contributed to health inequities in the Asia Pacific region. Contextually specific evidence and action are needed. This requires ongoing monitoring of health inequities and systematic evaluation of societal changes and their impact on health inequities. It requires better understanding of how to translate theoretical and empirical demonstrations of the social and environmental impact on health inequities into evidence-informed policies and programs, in diverse geopolitical, socioeconomic, and sociocultural contexts across the Asia Pacific region and the range of associated complex policy processes. A spotlight is needed on health inequities and their causes else the status quo will persist.
A paradigm shift for socioeconomic justice and health: from focusing on inequalities to aiming at sustainable equity

Juan E Garay,David E Chiriboga

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2017.04.015

IF: 4.984

Public Health

Abstract:Objectives: To measure the 'best possible health for all', incorporating sustainability, and to establish the magnitude of global health inequity. Study design: Observational, retrospective. Methods: We identified countries with three criteria: (1) a healthy population-life expectancy above world average; (2) living conditions feasible to replicate worldwide-per-capita gross domestic product (GDP-pc) below the world average; and (3) sustainability-per-capita carbon dioxide emissions lower than the planetary pollution boundary. Using these healthy, feasible, and sustainable (HFS) countries as the gold standard, we estimated the burden of global health inequity (BGHiE) in terms of excess deaths, analyzing time-trends (1950-2012) by age, sex, and geographic location. Finally, we defined a global income 'equity zone' and quantified the economic gap needed to achieve global sustainable health equity. Results: A total of 14 countries worldwide met the HFS criteria. Since 1970, there has been a BGHiE of ∼17 million avoidable deaths per year (∼40% of all deaths), with 36 life-years-lost per excess death. Young children and women bore a higher BGHiE, and, in recent years, the highest proportion of avoidable deaths occurred in Africa, India, and the Russian Federation. By 2012, the most efficient HFS countries had a GDP-pc/year of USD$2,165, which we proposed as the lower equity zone threshold. The estimated USD$2.58 trillion economic gap represents 3.6% of the world's GDP-twenty times larger than current total global foreign aid. Conclusions: Sustainable health equity metrics provide a benchmark tool to guide efforts toward transforming overall living conditions, as a means to achieve the 'best possible health for all.'
Non-government advocacy for health equity: evidence from Australia

Connie Musolino,Toby Freeman,Joanne Flavel,Fran Baum

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae148

2024-11-18

Health Promotion International

Abstract:The aim of this paper is to identify non-governmental organizations (NGOs) advocating for policy and practices to address rising health inequities in Australia. NGOs can play a critical role in shaping and influencing governance processes including public policy relating to the social and commercial determinants of health inequities. However, scholarship on who the NGOs are that are advocating to address health inequities in Australia and how they operate is sparse. Through desktop analysis in 2022, we searched NGO websites and documents for evidence of advocacy activities related to health inequities between 2017 and 2022. A database of the NGOs was compiled, noting the type of organization, function, advocacy activities and main issues their advocacy covered. A total of 137 NGOs were identified as engaging in activities advocating for change to address health inequities either directly (e.g. advocating directly to address health inequities) or indirectly (e.g. advocating on social determinants of health inequities such as housing and linking to their unequal health impacts). We noted the primary issues they advocated on, including topic categories: risk factor, disease-specific, broader health system, social determinants of health equity, and health workforce and service issues. The results indicate that Australian NGOs from multiple sectors are active in advocacy to address heath inequities on a variety of topics and through a variety of activities. This study provides a template for similar studies in other countries and suggests further research is needed to understand the role and impact of civil society advocacy to address growing health inequities.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services

Structure of diene-phosphonous dihalide addition products and of derived phospholenes and phospholene oxides.

Methods to promote equity in health resource allocation in low- and middle-income countries: an overview

Policy Approaches to Address the Social and Environmental Determinants of Health Inequity in Asia-Pacific

Reconstructing Damaged Complex Networks Based on Neural Networks

Health Equity and COVID-19: Global Perspectives.

Equity in health and healthcare in Malawi: analysis of trends

Progress Towards Health Equity in Vietnam: Evidence from Nationwide Official Health Statistics, 2010-2020

Paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation is associated with an abnormal atrial substrate: characterizing the "second factor".

Achieving equity within universal health coverage: a narrative review of progress and resources for measuring success

Equity and coverage in RMNCH health interventions by ethnicity, 2004- 2018: lessons learned from integral policies in Ecuador

How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions.

Advocacy for health equity: a synthesis review

Inequity in the face of success: understanding geographic and wealth-based equity in success of facility-based delivery for under-5 mortality reduction in six countries

Social Inclusion and Sustainable Development: Findings from Seven African and Asian Contexts

Hepatitis C: many small steps.

Health equity in Somalia? An evaluation of the progress made from 2006 to 2019 in reducing inequities in maternal and newborn health

[Hormone receptors].

Microcosm experiments can inform global ecological problems.

Freedom To Lead A Life We Have Reason To Value? A Spotlight On Health Inequity In The Asia Pacific Region

A paradigm shift for socioeconomic justice and health: from focusing on inequalities to aiming at sustainable equity

Non-government advocacy for health equity: evidence from Australia