A biopsy-based Immunoscore in patients with treatment-naïve resectable gastric cancer

Tanya T D Soeratram,Isis Beentjes,Jacqueline M P Egthuijsen,Aart Mookhoek,Marilyne M Lange,Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg,Henk H Hartgrink,Cornelis J H van de Velde,Bauke Ylstra,Hanneke W M van Laarhoven,Nicole C T van Grieken
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241287747
2024-10-21
Abstract:Background: The prognostic significance of T-cell densities in gastric cancer (GC) was previously demonstrated in surgical resection specimens. For prognosis or response prediction, it is preferable to identify biomarkers in pre-treatment biopsies; yet, its representativeness of the tumor immune microenvironment is unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the concordance and prognostic value of T-cell densities in paired biopsies and resections. Methods: Paired diagnostic biopsies and surgical resections were available for 131 patients with resectable GC who were treated with surgery alone in the D1/D2 trial. T-cell markers such as CD3, CD45RO, CD8, FOXP3, and Granzyme B were assessed by immunohistochemistry and digitally quantified. Tumors were categorized into high and low subgroups for each marker. The concordance between biopsies and resections was determined for each marker with Cohen's κ. To determine the prognostic value of T cells in biopsies, Cox regression was performed. Results: The concordance of T-cell high and low tumors was moderate for CD8 (κ = 0.58) and weak for other markers (κ < 0.3). CD8 and FOXP3 densities in biopsies were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. Multivariable analysis showed that an Immunoscore incorporating CD8 and FOXP3 served as an independent prognostic marker (low vs high: hazard ratio 3.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-9.10; p = 0.015). Conclusion: Although the concordance in T-cell densities between biopsy and resection specimens is modest, a biopsy-based Immunoscore identified distinct biological subgroups with prognostic potential. To fully evaluate the prognostic performance of this biopsy Immunoscore, additional studies are warranted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?