Abstract:Background Computed tomography (CT) scan is a common imaging technique used to evaluate the severity of a head injury. The overuse of diagnostic interventions in the health system is a growing concern worldwide. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the rate of CT scan overuse in cases of mild head injury. Methods Eligibility criteria: We encompassed observational studies—either designed as cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional investigations—that reported on CT scan overuse rates for mild head injuries. Studies had to be published in peer-reviewed, English-language sources and provide full content access Information sources: Web of Sciences, Scopus, Medline via PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from inception until April 1, 2023. Studies were included if reporting the overuse of CT scans for mild head injuries using validated criteria. Risk of bias: We used the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies ‐ of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to evaluate the risk bias assessment of included studies. Two independent reviewers evaluated the eligibility of studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Synthesis of results: Overuse estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate any sources of heterogeneity. Point rate of overuse of CT scans for mild head injuries was the main outcome measured as percentage point estimates with corresponding 95% CIs. Results Included studies: Of the 913 potentially relevant studies identified, eight studies were selected for the final analysis. Synthesis of results: The pooled rate of CT scan overuse in patients with mild head injury was found to be 27% [95% CI: 16–43; I 2 = 99%]. The rate of CT scan overuse in mild head injury cases varied depending on the criteria used. The rate of CT scan overuse was 37% [95% CI: 32–42; I 2 = 0%] with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), 30% [95% CI: 16–49; I 2 = 99%] with the Canadian computed tomography head rule, and 10% [95% CI: 8–14; I 2 = 0%] with the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network criterion (PERCAN). Based on subgroup analyses, the rate of CT scan overuse in mild head injury cases was observed to be 30% with the Canadian computed tomography head rule criterion, 43% with the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence criterion, and 18% with the New Orleans criterion. Conclusion Limitations of evidence: The restricted number of included studies may impact generalizability. High heterogeneity was observed, leading to subgroup analyses based on age, assessment criteria, and study region. Absent data on overuse causes hinders drawing conclusions on contributing factors. Furthermore, this study solely addressed overuse rates, not associated harm or benefits. Interpretation: The overuse of CT scans in mild head injury patients is concerning, as it can result in unnecessary radiation exposure and higher healthcare costs. Clinicians and policymakers should prioritize the implementation of guidelines to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure, healthcare costs, and potential harm to patients. Trial registration The study protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO under the identification code CRD42023416080 . https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023416080 .

SU-F-T-605: Implementation of the Conformity/Gradient Index (CGI) to Intracranial, Linac-Based Stereotactic Plans to Evaluate Possible Improvements in Treatment Planning.

[Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Cerebral Microbleeds Patients with Prior Antiplatelet Therapy].

Use of the Canadian CT head rule for patients on anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapy presenting with mild traumatic brain injury: prospective observational study

Cranial CT is a mandatory tool to exclude asymptomatic cerebral hemorrhage in elderly patients on anticoagulation

Microbleeds, Cerebral Hemorrhage, and Functional Outcome After Stroke Thrombolysis.

Management of older adults after mild head trauma in an oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic

The prevalence of clinically relevant delayed intracranial hemorrhage in head trauma patients treated with oral anticoagulants is very low: a retrospective cohort register study

The Risk of Deterioration in GCS13–15 Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Identified by Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Prevalence of intracranial hemorrhage amongst patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Low Incidence of Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Geriatric Emergency Department Patients on Preinjury Anticoagulation Presenting with Blunt Head Trauma

Abstract TP157: Utility of CT Angiography in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Higher risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy compared to oral anticoagulation—a single-center experience

Consideration of Brain CT Imaging Standard for Mild Head Injuries

Overuse of computed tomography for mild head injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

[Polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis of serum proteins in some teleost fishes].

[Capacities of multidetector spiral computed tomography in the planning and postoperative examination of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery].

Perfusion Computed Tomography as a Screening Tool for Pending Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Comatose Patients After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Computed Tomographic Scan for Head Injury Patients: Any Justification for Adapting Routine Cranio-Cervical Examination Irrespective of Clinical Severity?

Incidence and Risk Factors of Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Anticoagulated Head Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[Traumatic brain injury in patients over 65 years of age attended in the emergency department, characteristics and complications]

Patient Outcomes in Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Analysis