Abstract:Asymmetric division of neural progenitors is a key mechanism by which neuronal diversity in the Drosophila central nervous system is generated. The distinct fates of the daughter cells derived from these divisions are achieved through preferential segregation of the cell fate determinants Prospero and Numb to one of the two daughters. This is achieved by coordinating apical and basal mitotic spindle orientation with the basal cortical localization of the cell fate determinants during mitosis. A complex of apically localized proteins, including Inscuteable (Insc), Partner of Inscuteable (Pins), Bazooka (Baz), DmPar-6, DaPKC, and Galphai, is required to mediate and coordinate basal protein localization with mitotic spindle orientation. Pins, a molecule which directly interacts with Insc, is a key component required for the integrity of this complex; in the absence of Pins, other components become mislocalized or destabilized, and basal protein localization and mitotic spindle orientation are defective. Here we define the functional domains of Pins. We show that the C-terminal region containing the God binding GoLoco motifs is necessary and sufficient for targeting to the neuroblast cortex, which appears to be a prerequisite for apical localization of Pins. The N-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat-containing region of Pins is required for two processes; TPR repeats 1 to 3 plus the C-terminal region are required for apical localization but are insufficient to recruit Insc to the apical cortex, whereas TPR repeats 1 to 7 plus C-terminal Pins can perform both functions. Hence, the abilities of Pins to cortically localize, to apically localize, and to restore Insc apical localization are all separable, and all three capabilities are necessary to mediate asymmetric division. Moreover, the need for N-terminal Pins can be obviated by fusing a minimal Insc functional domain with the C-terminal region of Pins; this chimeric molecule is apically localized and can fulfill the functions of both Insc and Pins.

Biochemical Analysis of the Regulatory Role of Gαo in the Conformational Transitions of Drosophila Pins

Biochemical Analysis of the Regulatory Role of Gα o in the Conformational Transitions of Drosophila Pins

Locomotion Defects, Together with Pins, Regulates Heterotrimeric G-protein Signaling During Drosophila Neuroblast Asymmetric Divisions

Crystal Structures of the Scaffolding Protein LGN Reveal the General Mechanism by Which GoLoco Binding Motifs Inhibit the Release of GDP from Gαi

A Residue Outside the Binding Site Determines the Gα Binding Specificity of GoLoco Motifs.

An autoinhibited conformation of LGN reveals a distinct interaction mode between GoLoco motifs and TPR motifs.

Molecular Insights into AGS3's Role in Spindle Orientation: A Biochemical Perspective

A Distinct Golgi-targeting Mechanism of Dgm130 in Drosophila Neurons.

A mouse homologue of <i>Drosophila pins</i> can asymmetrically localize and substitute for <i>pins</i> function in <i>Drosophila</i>neuroblasts

Structural insights into G protein activation by D1 dopamine receptor

Gαs Slow Conformational Transition Upon GTP Binding and a Novel Gαs Regulator

The spatial distribution of GPCR and Gβγ activity across a cell dictates PIP3 dynamics

Analyzing and Modeling the Inhibitory Effect of Phosphatidic Acid on the Gtp-Gamma-S Binding Activity of Go Alpha

The Second Intracellular Loop of D2r Activates Galphai1

The Structural Basis of the Dominant Negative Phenotype of the Gα I1 Β 1 Γ 2 G203A/A326S Heterotrimer

Palmitoylation Regulates Gdp/Gtp Exchange of G Protein by Affecting the Gtp-Binding Activity of Go Alpha

Membrane Targeting and Asymmetric Localization of Drosophila Partner of Inscuteable Are Discrete Steps Controlled by Distinct Regions of the Protein

A Steric-inhibition model for regulation of nucleotide exchange via the Dock180 family of GEFs.

Rewiring protein binding specificity in paralogous DRG/DFRP complexes

Dissociation mechanism of GDP from Cdc42 via DOCK9 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations.