[Recent advance in tumor necrosis factor-α blockade treatment for Kawasaki disease].

Hui Yan,Junbao Du

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Implementing Measurement-Based Care in a Youth Partial Hospital Setting: Leveraging Feedback for Sustainability

Jill Donelan,Susan Douglas,Ariane Willson,Tyrena Lester,Stephanie Daly

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01358-2

2024-04-05

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract:This paper describes the successful implementation of Measurement-Based Care (MBC) within a Partial Hospitalization Program (PHP) for children and adolescents. Measurement-based care (MBC), the practice of using patient-reported measures routinely to inform decision-making, is associated with improved clinical outcomes for behavioral health patients (Jong et al., Clinical Psychology Review 85, 2021; Fortney & Sladek, 2015). MBC holds great promise in partial hospital programs (PHP) to improve outcomes, yet implementation strategies are as complex as the setting itself. This paper provides a case study example of MBC implementation in a PHP for youth. Over the course of 18 months, an interdisciplinary staff of approximately 20 behavioral health professionals provided partial hospitalization level of care to 633 (39% in-person, 61% telehealth) youth from ages 5 to 18 years old. MBC in this setting incorporated daily patient self-report and weekly caregiver-reported measurements. This descriptive reconstruction, which includes examples of the data that were used during the implementation project, illustrates specific barriers and facilitators in a successful implementation in the local PHP setting. Implementation strategies to address workflow integration, leadership and supervision, and coaching are described, including evolution of these strategies over the course of implementation. Practical considerations for implementing MBC in youth PHP settings are discussed. Finally, the authors explore the potential relationships between the data-driven MBC model of decision making and the development of resilient organizations.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
Putting measurement-based care into action: a multi-method study of the benefits of integrating routine client feedback in coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis

Piper Meyer-Kalos,Grace Owens,Melissa Fisher,Lionel Wininger,Anne Williams-Wengerd,Kimberleigh Breen,Josephine Pita Abate,Ariel Currie,Nathan Olinger,Sophia Vinogradov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06258-1

IF: 4.144

2024-12-03

BMC Psychiatry

Abstract:Measurement-based care (MBC) is an effective tool in the delivery of evidence-based practices (EBPs). MBC utilizes feedback loops to share information and drive changes throughout a learning healthcare system. Few studies have demonstrated this practice in team-based care for young people with early psychosis. This paper describes the development of a personalized feedback report derived from routine assessments that is shared with clients and clinicians as part of a MBC process.

psychiatry
Delivering Remote Measurement-Based Care in Community Addiction Treatment: Engagement and Usability Over a 6-Month Clinical Pilot

Kevin A. Hallgren,Eliza B. Cohn,Richard K. Ries,David C. Atkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.840409

IF: 4.7

2022-04-07

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Objective Measurement-based care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice in which patients routinely complete standardized measures throughout treatment to help monitor clinical progress and inform clinical decision-making. Despite its potential benefits, MBC is rarely used in community-based substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. In this pilot study, we evaluated the feasibility of incorporating a digital and remotely delivered MBC system into SUD treatment within a community setting by characterizing patients’ and clinicians’ engagement with and usability ratings toward the MBC system that was piloted. Methods A pilot study was conducted with 30 patients receiving SUD treatment and eight clinicians providing SUD treatment in a large, publicly funded addiction and mental health treatment clinic. Services as usual within the clinic included individual psychotherapy, case management, group therapy, peer support, and medication management for mental health and SUD, including buprenorphine. Patients who enrolled in the pilot continued to receive services as usual and were automatically sent links to complete a 22-item questionnaire, called the weekly check-in , via text message or email weekly for 24 weeks. Results of the weekly check-in were summarized on a clinician-facing web-based dashboard. Engagement was characterized by calculating the mean number of weekly check-ins completed by patients and the mean number times clinicians logged into the MBC system. Ratings of the MBC system’s usability and clinical utility were provided by patients and clinicians. Results Patient participants (53.3% male, 56.7% white, 90% Medicaid enrolled) completed a mean of 20.60 weekly check-ins (i.e., 85.8% of the 24 expected per patient). All but one participating clinician with a patient enrolled in the study logged into the clinician-facing dashboard at least once, with an average of 12.20 logins per clinician. Patient and clinician ratings of usability and clinical utility were favorable: most patients agreed with statements that the weekly check-in was easy to navigate and aided self-reflection. All clinicians who completed usability questionnaires agreed with statements indicating that the dashboard was easy to navigate and that it provided meaningful information for SUD treatment. Conclusions A digital and remotely delivered MBC system can yield high rates of patient and clinician engagement and high ratings of usability and clinical utility when added into SUD treatment as usual. The success of this clinical pilot may be attributable, in part, to the user-centered design processes that were used to develop and refine the MBC system that was piloted. Future efforts may focus on strategies to test whether MBC can be sustainably implemented and offers clinical benefits to patients in community SUD treatment settings.

psychiatry
Putting measurement-based care into action: A mixed methods study of the benefits of integrating routine client feedback in coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis

Piper Meyer-Kalos,Grace Owens,Melissa Fisher,Lionel Wininger,Anne Williams-Wengerd,Kimberleigh Breen,Josephine Abate,Ariel Currie,Nathan Olinger,Sophia Vinogradov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3918063/v1

2024-02-08

Abstract:Background: Measurement-based care (MBC) is an effective tool in the delivery of evidence-based practices (EBPs). MBC utilizes feedback loops to share information and drive changes throughout a learning healthcare system. Few studies have demonstrated this practice in team-based care for people with early psychosis. This paper describes the development of a personalized feedback report derived from routine assessments that is shared with clients and clinicians as part of a MBC process. Methods: We used a quasi pre-post comparison design with mixed methods to evaluate the implementation of a personalized feedback report at 5 early psychosis coordinated specialty care programs (CSC). We compared clients enrolled in CSC who did and did not receive a feedback report over the first 6 months of treatment. The sample included 204 clients: 146 who did not receive the feedback report and were enrolled over 2 years, and 58 who received the feedback report. A subset of 67 clients completed measures at both intake and 6-month follow-up, including 42 who received the report and 25 who did not. We compared the two groups with regard to self-reported symptoms, likelihood of completing treatment, and perception of shared decision making. We conducted qualitative interviews with 5 clients and 5 clinicians to identify the benefits and challenges associated with the personalized feedback report. Results: People who received a personalized feedback report reported significant improvements in shared decision-making and had greater improvements over time in their intent to attend future treatment sessions. They engaged in more sessions for Supported Employment and Education (SEE), case management, and peer support, and fewer medication visits over the first 6 months of treatment. Both groups showed significant improvement in symptoms and functioning. Results from the qualitative analysis indicated that the experience of receiving the reports was valuable and validating for both patients and clinicians. Conclusions: A personalized feedback report was integrated into standard of care for early psychosis programs. This process may improve shared decision-making, strengthen the likelihood to stay in treatment, and increase engagement in psychosocial interventions. We posit that this process facilitates strengths-focused discussions, enhances intrinsic motivation, and strengthens the therapeutic alliance.
Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Service Settings for Youth: A Systematic Review

Emma D. Whitmyre,Christianne Esposito-Smythers,Roberto López,Debora G. Goldberg,Freda Liu,Annamarie B. Defayette

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00498-z

IF: 7.41

2024-10-31

Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Abstract:Measurement-Based Care (MBC) is the systematic use of patient-reported data to inform care decisions and monitor treatment progress. MBC has been shown to improve patient outcomes across medical and mental health treatment settings for adults and youth. While many studies have examined the use of MBC in specific care settings, few have focused on the implementation of MBC among youth populations or across care settings. While a review has shown that use of MBC benefits youth, no published reviews exist that summarize the successful strategies and barriers to implementation models across studies in youth service settings. To address these gaps, the present systematic review ( N = 25 studies) focuses on the implementation of MBC across four youth service settings, including outpatient mental health centers, medical centers/pediatric clinics, schools, and clinical psychology training clinics. Results suggest that few studies employ consistent implementation models or strategies to guide efforts. Further, there is significant overlap in the successful strategies employed as well as the barriers to implementation of MBC across youth service settings, at the client, clinician, and organizational levels. Broadly, the authors recommend on the basis of findings that future implementation work in youth service settings: incorporate comprehensive training in the use of MBC for clinicians; incorporate stakeholder feedback into the implementation process for initial and sustained use; employ digital measurement feedback systems to deliver MBC that allow for real-time feedback and continuous technical support; and employ a health equity lens in implementation efforts to help address disparities in access to and use of MBC so that all youth and families may benefit from this evidence-based practice.

psychology, clinical
Measurement-based Care as a Practice Improvement Tool: Clinical and Organizational Applications in Youth Mental Health

Amanda Jensen-Doss,Susan Douglas,Dominique A. Phillips,Ozgur Gencdur,Amber Zalman,Noelle Elena Gomez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2020.1784062

2020-07-02

Abstract:<span>Measurement-based care (MBC) is a systematic, ongoing assessment to monitor treatment progress and inform clinical decision-making. MBC is considered an evidence-based practice, with extensive research support in adult clinical populations and emerging evidence in youth populations. This paper describes both clinical (e.g., enhancing therapy alliance, informing case conceptualization) and organizational (e.g., informing quality improvement efforts) applications of MBC, and illustrates the clinical applications through two case examples from publicly funded mental health agency settings. The paper concludes by detailing future research needed to enhance the clinical and organizational utility of MBC.</span>
Provider Use of, Attitudes Towards, and Self-efficacy with Key Measurement-based Care Practices in Youth Mental Health Treatment: A Multi-site Examination

Jensen-Doss, Amanda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01354-6

2024-02-10

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract:Measurement-based care (MBC) is an underutilized evidence-based practice, and current implementation efforts demonstrate limited success in increasing MBC use. A better understanding of MBC implementation determinants is needed to improve these efforts, particularly from studies examining the full range of MBC practices and that span multiple samples of diverse providers using different MBC systems. This study addressed these limitations by conducting a multi-site survey examining MBC predictors and use in youth treatment. Participants were 159 clinicians and care coordinators working in youth mental health care settings across the United States. Participants were drawn from three program evaluations of MBC implementation. Providers completed measures assessing use of five MBC practices (administering measures, viewing feedback, reviewing feedback in supervision, sharing feedback with clients in session, and using feedback to plan treatment), MBC self-efficacy, and MBC attitudes. Despite expectations that MBC should be standard care for all clients, providers reported only administering measures to 40–60% of clients on average, with practices related to the use of feedback falling in the 1–39% range. Higher MBC self-efficacy and more positive views of MBC practicality predicted higher MBC use, although other attitude measures were not significant predictors. Effects of predictors were not moderated by site, suggesting consistent predictors across implementation settings. Implications of study findings for future research and for the implementation of MBC are discussed.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
Consultation Content and Techniques for measurement-Based Care Implementation in Youth Community Mental Health Settings

Elizabeth Casline,Grace S. Woodard,Elizabeth Lane,Scott Pollowitz,Susan Douglas,Jill Ehrenreich-May,Golda S. Ginsburg,Amanda Jensen-Doss

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01417-8

2024-10-15

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract:Measurement-based care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice (EBP) focused on regularly administering outcome measures to clients to inform clinical decision making. While MBC shows promise for improving youth treatment outcomes, therapist adoption remains low. Clinical consultation is one strategy that improves MBC implementation, but our limited understanding of consultation hinders the ability to optimize its impact. This research explored the content of, and techniques used during MBC consultation calls. Therapists ( N = 55) in a randomized controlled trial treating adolescents with anxiety and/or depression were trained to utilize MBC with usual treatment using the Youth Outcome Questionnaire (YOQ) through an online measurement feedback system (MFS). Weekly ongoing consultation followed an initial workshop training in MBC. Case discussions ( N = 294) during consultation calls were coded using a developed codebook, including 12 content and 10 consultant techniques. Results indicated that content focused predominantly on interpretation of client symptom and alliance report, planning for YOQ administration, and discussion of data with clients in session. Common consultant techniques included modeling and eliciting report viewing and interpretation, making clinical suggestions, and didactics about clinical and technical issues. Notably, role-play/behavioral rehearsal was not used. The prevalence of passive consultation techniques (suggestions, didactics) suggests a focus on teaching rather than active techniques (behavioral rehearsal, modeling), potentially influenced by the novelty of MBC and MFS. Technical aspects of MBC, such as measure administration and system usage, emerged as key consultation content, highlighting an unanticipated emphasis on logistics over clinical implementation. These findings underscore the evolving role of consultation in supporting MBC implementation and suggest that addressing technical challenges early in training might enhance adoption.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
Shifting From Best Practice to Standard Practice: Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Health Systems

Amber E. Deane,Joshua S. Elmore,Taryn L. Mayes,Skylar Robinson,Yasmin AlZubi,Sarah M. Wakefield,Madhukar H. Trivedi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01715-0

2024-06-20

Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Abstract:There is a high prevalence of untreated depression in adults and youth observed at the population level in the United States, and many who would benefit from treatment do not receive it. One proposed effort to increase access to care is the use of measurement-based care (MBC; repeated use of symptom measures for screening and treatment guidance) by primary care physicians to treat non-complex cases of depression. MBC has been shown to improve patient outcomes compared to care as usual, but there are barriers that need to be addressed at the health system level for effective implementation to occur. Herein we provide an overview of MBC and detail benefits and barriers of MBC implementation. Relevant considerations and guidance for implementing MBC are presented, and a case example of a health system implementing MBC is included. Though issues of reimbursement, limited human and technological resources, and resistance to systemic change are barriers to implementing MBC, effective strategies exist to overcome these barriers. In addition to helping health systems align with changes to value-based care models, effective implementation of MBC can likely improve patient outcomes and result in net financial benefits.

psychiatry,psychology, developmental
Measurement-Based Care as a Tool to Detect and Prevent Harm in Youth Psychotherapy

Elizabeth Casline,Susan Douglas,Maartje van Sonsbeek,Kelsie Okamura,Amanda Jensen-Doss

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01262-1

2024-11-28

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract:Measurement-based care (MBC), the use of routine assessment to guide clinical decision-making, has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of mental health services for youth by improving the detection and prevention of harm. Concerns exist, however, that widespread efforts to implement MBC may have a negative impact on youth mental health care. We explore both perspectives by describing how MBC can be leveraged as a tool to detect and prevent harmful treatment in youth and how misapplication of MBC also has the potential to cause harm. This discussion focuses on how MBC can help therapists identify harm caused by ineffective practices (i.e., deterioration or no symptoms changes), poor client engagement (e.g., early drop-out, poor alliance), and adverse events (e.g., injury caused by treatment). We also discuss multi-level applications of aggregated MBC data to prevent harm through workforce development and organizational and health systems quality and cost of care improvement initiatives. Misapplication of MBC by failing to adhere to MBC best practices, overreliance on data above clinical judgement, providing insufficient organizational support, and using MBC data to justify cost containment are all discussed as possible sources of harm. We conclude with a discussion of future directions for research needed to advance the application of MBC to the prevention of harm in youth psychotherapy.

psychology, clinical, developmental
Youth, caregiver, and clinician perspectives of youth Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in a psychological training clinic: lessons from early adopters

Alyssa J. Gatto,Hayoung Ko,Delaney M. Keller,Lee D. Cooper

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05619-z

IF: 2.8

2024-01-26

Current Psychology

Abstract:This study examines the applicability and utility of youth Measurement-Based Care (MBC) in a community-based psychological training clinic. Considering the complexity of youth compared to adult MBC, there is an increasing need to expand the evidence base. This study investigated how doctoral students in clinical psychology managed the selection and usage of Patient Rated Outcome Measures (PROMs) for youth and their parents. Additionally, this study evaluates youth attitudes toward MBC and PROMs and overall appropriateness and completion rates. Youth ( N = 79) from 1 to 17-years-old with various mental health disorders (i.e., depression, anxiety, ADHD) completed evidence-based psychotherapy. Clinicians ( N = 21) were trained to have therapy clients and their caregivers' complete weekly measures digitally as an integrated part of standard care. All clinicians, youth clients, and their parents reported attitudes supporting the utility of youth PROMs and MBC. Compared to adult clients ( N = 81), youth clients were significantly less adherent in regularly completing their weekly measures. These results demonstrate the usage of MBC and utility of implementing this practice for youth clients in a training clinic. Together, there is a need for improving the specificity of training for clinicians who will administer MBC for youth above and beyond what is indicated for adult clients.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Measurement-Based Care in Youth: An Opportunity for Better Clinical Outcomes?

Roberta Frontini,Catarina Costa,Sílvia Baptista,Constança do Carmo Garcia,António Vian-Lains

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12090910

2024-04-28

Health Care

Abstract:Measurement-based care (MBC) is a procedure in which systematic and routine assessments are performed. Through this practice, clinicians can verify the progress of the symptomatology of the patient and adapt the appointments and the intervention to the current symptoms. Studies have reflected on the importance and the benefits of this type of procedure in the adult population, and have shown positive results. However, there is a lack of evidence concerning the remaining populations. Regarding youth, for instance, few articles have evaluated the benefits of using this procedure in clinical practice. However, research focused on this topic has revealed positive results, especially when clinicians were loyal to the MBC procedures. Still, further research is needed. This letter aims to share the methodology used by our multidisciplinary team, composed of psychologists and psychiatrists, in a clinical context at the Hospital Cruz Vermelha, Lisboa, applied to the adult population; the objective is to share and discuss some alterations that could be made to our evaluation protocol to enable the same to be used with the youth population. We believe that implementing MBC for youth is crucial for several reasons, including enhanced treatment efficacy, more personalized treatment, a reduced reliance on subjectivity, and empowerment not only of patients but also families.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Using Technology to Support Measurement-Based Care: Design and Implementation of the Measurement-Assisted Care Program

Dana Steidtmann,Katie E Raffel,Joel Green,Edward MacPhee,Sarah Nagle-Yang,Sarah Schwenk,Danielle Cooke,Alejandra C Santisteban,Allison G Dempsey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240135

2024-10-23

Abstract:Objective: The authors aimed to increase measurement-based care in an outpatient academic psychiatry service. Methods: The Measurement-Assisted Care program (MAC) was implemented as a clinical quality-improvement effort that included 4,665 unique patients and 176 clinicians over 12 months. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and Brief Inventory of Thriving were automatically included in the patient electronic check-in process for new visits; the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were included for return visits. Patient responses were automatically routed to clinicians' electronic health record inboxes and documentation templates. MAC was rolled out in two phases, and clinicians were surveyed about their use of MAC data 3-6 months after the start of the program. Results: After implementation of MAC, PHQ-9 completion rates increased from 5% to 66% of visits for phase 1 and from 5% to 60% for phase 2. Post-MAC completion rates were higher for telehealth (70%) than for in-person (40%) visits. More than 90% of clinicians reported that MAC was useful with at least one of their three most recent patients, and 51% reported that it was useful with all three of their three most recent patients. Clinician adoption was high, with 78% reporting that they use MAC data to guide care. Conclusions: MAC increased the completion rate of patient-reported outcome measures, especially for telehealth visits. Clinicians reported that they frequently use and discuss MAC data with patients, implying that technology-supported workflows can help systems with high telehealth utilization capture and use patient-reported outcomes.
Data-Informed Communication: How Measurement-Based Care Can Optimize Child Psychotherapy

Connors, Elizabeth H.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01372-4

2024-04-26

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract:Measurement-based care (MBC) research and practice, including clinical workflows and systems to support MBC, are grounded in adult-serving mental health systems. MBC research evidence is building in child and adolescent services, but MBC practice is inherently more complex due to identified client age, the family system and the need to involve multiple reporters. This paper seeks to address a gap in the literature by providing practical guidance for youth-serving clinicians implementing MBC with children and their families. We focus on MBC as a data-informed, client-centered communication process, and present three key strategies to enhance usual care child and adolescent psychotherapy via developmentally-appropriate MBC. These strategies include (1) go beyond standardized measures; (2) lean into discrepancies; and (3) get curious together. Case-based examples drawn from various child-serving settings illustrate these key strategies of MBC in child psychotherapy.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
Using Neuropsychological Profiling to Tailor Mental Health Care for Children and Youth: a Quality Improvement Project to Measure Feasibility

Angelica Blais,Anne-Lise Holahan,Amanda Helleman,Kathleen Pajer,Christina Honeywell,Roxana Salehi,Peter Anderson,Marsha Vasserman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae087

2024-09-30

Abstract:Objective: Precision child and youth mental healthcare has great potential to improve treatment success by tailoring interventions to individual needs. An innovative care pathway in a pediatric mental health outpatient clinic was designed to allow for neuropsychology data to be integrated in psychotherapeutic care. This paper describes the feasibility of this new pathway, including implementation outcomes, acceptability, and potential for future integration. Method: The target population was outpatients 6-17 years old referred for individual treatment to a tertiary outpatient mental health (OPMH) clinic. The new care pathway was co-developed by neuropsychologists and mental health practitioners. A logic model was created to guide the evaluation, which was informed by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance framework. As part of the logic model, a stepped assessment protocol was implemented, and reports on neuropsychological function were shared with patients, caregivers, and care providers. Evaluation data were collected from phone surveys, questionnaires, a focus group, and administrative records. Results: Forty-two patients scheduled to receive therapy over a 6-month period were offered the opportunity to participate in the new care pathway and 39 (93%) agreed. Self-reported outcome data showed that 83% of patients and 94% of caregivers valued neuropsychology-informed care, with some describing it as transformative. Almost all practitioners (91%) reported that the project added value to their clinical care. There were no adverse effects on participants nor the flow of patients through the system. Conclusions: Neuropsychology-informed pediatric OPMH care was feasible and well-received. Clinical effectiveness should be studied in an experimental trial.
What Gets Measured Gets Done: How Mental Health Agencies can Leverage Measurement-Based Care for Better Patient Care, Clinician Supports, and Organizational Goals

Elizabeth H. Connors,Susan Douglas,Amanda Jensen-Doss,Sara J. Landes,Cara C. Lewis,Bryce D. McLeod,Cameo Stanick,Aaron R. Lyon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01063-w

2020-07-12

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract:Mental health clinicians and administrators are increasingly asked to collect and report treatment outcome data despite numerous challenges to select and use instruments in routine practice. Measurement-based care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice for improving patient care. We propose that data collected from MBC processes with patients can be strategically leveraged by agencies to also support clinicians and respond to accountability requirements. MBC data elements are outlined using the Precision Mental Health Framework (Bickman et al. in Adm Policy Mental Health Mental Health Serv Res 43:271–276, 2016), practical guidance is provided for agency administrators, and conceptual examples illustrate strategic applications of one or more instruments to meet various needs throughout the organization.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
Measurement-Based Care: A Practical Strategy Toward Improving Behavioral Health Through Primary Care

Andrew D. Carlo,Kelli S. Scott,Clare McNutt,Hani Talebi,Anna D. Ratzliff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08877-6

IF: 5.7

2024-10-09

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract:Behavioral health care access is inadequate and new primary care–based strategies are needed to meet the rising demand. Behavioral health integration (BHI) models, such as collaborative care (CoCM) or the primary care behavioral health (PCBH) model, are often touted as actionable and sustainable solutions. The intent of such models is to bring behavioral health expertise into medical settings with the aims of improving outcomes, increasing treatment capacity, and reducing stigma. BHI models differ across several parameters, though measurement-based care (MBC) is a key component of virtually all effective approaches. MBC employs the repeated and timely use of validated instruments to inform medical decision-making for individual patients at the point of care and has a demonstrated association with improved outcomes. MBC generally has more flexibility for workflow development and fewer financial, staffing, and IT requirements than CoCM, PCBH, or other models. It can also be implemented by primary medical providers independently. Recent encouraging developments include technical assistance opportunities for MBC implementation and emerging payment models that emphasize MBC. However, concerns remain surrounding the limitations of existing MBC billing codes. Ultimately, with continued advocacy and thoughtful policy decision-making, MBC has the potential to be a solution to the current behavioral health crisis.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
A protocol for the formative evaluation of the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services as part of a learning health system

Erin McCabe,Michele Dyson,Deborah McNeil,Whitney Hindmarch,Iliana Ortega,Paul D. Arnold,Gina Dimitropoulos,Ryan Clements,Maria J. Santana,Jennifer D. Zwicker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01174-y

2024-07-18

Health Research Policy and Systems

Abstract:Mental health conditions affect one in seven young people and research suggests that current mental health services are not meeting the needs of most children and youth. Learning health systems are an approach to enhancing services through rapid, routinized cycles of continuous learning and improvement. Patient-reported outcome measures provide a key data source for learning health systems. They have also been shown to improve outcomes for patients when integrated into routine clinical care. However, implementing these measures into health systems is a challenging process. This paper describes a protocol for a formative evaluation of the implementation of patient-reported measures in a newly operational child and adolescent mental health centre in Calgary, Canada. The purpose is to optimize the collection and use of patient-reported outcome measures. Our specific objectives are to assess the implementation progress, identify barriers and facilitators to implementation, and explore patient, caregivers and clinician experiences of using these measures in routine clinical care.

health policy & services
Evaluating the Implementation and Clinical Effectiveness of an Innovative Digital First Care Model for Behavioral Health Using the RE-AIM Framework: Quantitative Evaluation

Samuel S Nordberg,Brittany A Jaso-Yim,Pratha Sah,Keke Schuler,Mara Eyllon,Mariesa Pennine,Georgia H Hoyler,J Ben Barnes,Lily Hong Murillo,Heather O'Dea,Laura Orth,Elizabeth Rogers,George Welch,Gabrielle Peloquin,Soo Jeong Youn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/54528

IF: 7.076

2024-10-31

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:Background: In the United States, innovation is needed to address the increasing need for mental health care services and widen the patient-to-provider ratio. Despite the benefits of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), they have not been effective in addressing patients' behavioral health challenges as stand-alone treatments. Objective: This study evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of precision behavioral health (PBH), a digital-first behavioral health care model embedded within routine primary care that refers patients to an ecosystem of evidence-based DMHIs with strategically placed human support. Methods: Patient demographic information, triage visit outcomes, multidimensional patient-reported outcome measure, enrollment, and engagement with the DMHIs were analyzed using data from the electronic health record and vendor-reported data files. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework was used to evaluate the implementation and clinical effectiveness outcomes of PBH. Results: PBH had a 47.58% reach rate, defined as patients accepting the PBH referral from their behavioral health integrated clinician. PBH patients had high DMHI registration rates (79.62%), high activation rates (76.54%), and high retention rates at 15 days (57.69%) and 30 days (44.58%) compared to literature benchmarks. In total, 74.01% (n=168) of patients showed clinical improvement, 22.47% (n=51) showed no clinical change, and 3.52% (n=8) showed clinical deterioration in symptoms. PBH had high adoption rates, with behavioral health integrated clinicians referring on average 4.35 (SD 0.46) patients to PBH per month and 90%-100% of clinicians (n=12) consistently referring at least 1 patient to PBH each month. A third (32%, n=1114) of patients were offered PBH as a treatment option during their triage visit. Conclusions: PBH as a care model with evidence-based DMHIs, human support for patients, and integration within routine settings offers a credible service to support patients with mild to moderate mental health challenges. This type of model has the potential to address real-life access to care problems faced by health care settings. Trial Registration:

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Different factors identified by stakeholder group for barriers and facilitators to measurement‐based care implementation in behavioral health clinics

Amy M. Yule,Soo Jeong Youn,Kimberlye Dean,Diana W. Woodward,Elizabeth S. Firmin,Joanna Kramer,Mira Stone,Luana Marques,Timothy E. Wilens

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23639

2024-01-19

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract:Introduction Despite the benefits of measurement‐based care (MBC) in the behavioral health setting, there have been difficulties in implementation and low saturation. Although barriers and facilitators to MBC implementation have been identified, research has generally only included the perspective of one stakeholder group. The current study aims to examine the similarities and differences—by stakeholder group—in the identified barriers to and facilitators of implementing MBC in the behavioral health setting. Method A purposeful sampling approach was used to recruit and conduct interviews and focus groups with stakeholders (clinicians, clinic leaders, and administrative staff) from four behavioral health clinics at an academic medical center that is part of a larger healthcare system. The data coding process included a directed content analytic approach whereby the coding team used an iterative process to analyze deidentified transcripts starting with a codebook based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs. Results A total of 31 clinicians, 11 clinic leaders, and 8 administrative staff participated in the interviews and focus groups. There was convergence among all stakeholder regarding which CFIR constructs were identified as barriers and facilitators, but there were differences in the specific thematic factors identified by stakeholders as barriers and facilitators within each of these implementation constructs. The barriers and facilitators that stakeholders identified within each CFIR construct were often connected to their specific role in implementing MBC. Conclusion Collecting information on barriers and facilitators to MBC implementation from the multiple stakeholders involved in the process may enhance successful implementation of MBC given the variation between groups in identified thematic factors. Administrative staff perspectives, which have not been reported in the literature, may be of particular importance in planning for successful MBC implementation.

psychology, clinical

[Recent advance in tumor necrosis factor-α blockade treatment for Kawasaki disease].

Implementing Measurement-Based Care in a Youth Partial Hospital Setting: Leveraging Feedback for Sustainability

Putting measurement-based care into action: a multi-method study of the benefits of integrating routine client feedback in coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis

Delivering Remote Measurement-Based Care in Community Addiction Treatment: Engagement and Usability Over a 6-Month Clinical Pilot

Putting measurement-based care into action: A mixed methods study of the benefits of integrating routine client feedback in coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis

Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Service Settings for Youth: A Systematic Review

Measurement-based Care as a Practice Improvement Tool: Clinical and Organizational Applications in Youth Mental Health

Provider Use of, Attitudes Towards, and Self-efficacy with Key Measurement-based Care Practices in Youth Mental Health Treatment: A Multi-site Examination

Consultation Content and Techniques for measurement-Based Care Implementation in Youth Community Mental Health Settings

Shifting From Best Practice to Standard Practice: Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Health Systems

Measurement-Based Care as a Tool to Detect and Prevent Harm in Youth Psychotherapy

Youth, caregiver, and clinician perspectives of youth Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in a psychological training clinic: lessons from early adopters

Measurement-Based Care in Youth: An Opportunity for Better Clinical Outcomes?

Using Technology to Support Measurement-Based Care: Design and Implementation of the Measurement-Assisted Care Program

Data-Informed Communication: How Measurement-Based Care Can Optimize Child Psychotherapy

Using Neuropsychological Profiling to Tailor Mental Health Care for Children and Youth: a Quality Improvement Project to Measure Feasibility

What Gets Measured Gets Done: How Mental Health Agencies can Leverage Measurement-Based Care for Better Patient Care, Clinician Supports, and Organizational Goals

Measurement-Based Care: A Practical Strategy Toward Improving Behavioral Health Through Primary Care

A protocol for the formative evaluation of the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services as part of a learning health system

Evaluating the Implementation and Clinical Effectiveness of an Innovative Digital First Care Model for Behavioral Health Using the RE-AIM Framework: Quantitative Evaluation

Different factors identified by stakeholder group for barriers and facilitators to measurement‐based care implementation in behavioral health clinics