Abstract:With the arrival of the third revolution of artificial intelligence, the applications of artificial intelligence in the fields of automatic driving, image recognition, smart home, machine translation, medical services, e-sports, and so on can be seen everywhere, and topics about artificial intelligence are constantly emerging. Since 2017, the discussion on artificial intelligence in the field of law has become more and more active. In this context, the application of artificial intelligence in the field of legal judgment and the hypothetical system based on this technology in court judgment has also become the object of discussion from time to time. In this paper, based on the artificial intelligence decision-making method of the deep neural network, aiming at the three subtasks of legal judgment prediction, namely, crime prediction, law recommendation, and sentence prediction, a multi-task judgment prediction model BERT12multi and a sentence interval prediction model BERT-Text CNN are proposed, which improve the prediction accuracy and adopt the knowledge distillation strategy to compress the model parameters and improve the reasoning speed of the judgment model. Experiments on the CAIL2018 data set show that the performance of the deep neural network model in crime prediction and law recommendation tasks can be significantly improved by adopting the pre training model adaptive training, grouping focus loss, and gradient confrontation training strategies. Using a step-by-step sentence prediction strategy can realize the weight sharing of pre training model and make use of the prediction results of charges and laws in sentence prediction. The recall training-prediction strategy can avoid error accumulation and improve the accuracy of sentence prediction. By integrating the artificial intelligence decision-making method, the case reasoning speed can be greatly improved, the highest compressible model volume can be about 11% of the original one, and the reasoning speed can be increased by about 8 times. At the same time, performance close to that of the deep neural model can be obtained, which is superior to other legal decision prediction models based on word embedding.

Explainable artificial intelligence for assault sentence prediction in New Zealand

The Sentencing-Element-Aware Model for Explainable Term-of-Penalty Prediction

Justifiable Artificial Intelligence: Engineering Large Language Models for Legal Applications

Deep Learning-Based Intelligent Robot in Sentencing

A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Decision-Making Method for Legal Judgment Based on Deep Neural Network

Legal knowledge management for prosecutors based on judgment prediction and error analysis from indictments

Criminal Justice and Artificial Intelligence: How Should we Assess the Performance of Sentencing Algorithms?

Harnessing Explanations to Bridge AI and Humans

Using Case Facts to Predict Accusation Based on Deep Learning.

Can We Trust Explainable AI Methods on ASR? An Evaluation on Phoneme Recognition

Legal Challenges and Responses to Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Decision-Making in the International Economic Law System

Explanation matters: An experimental study on explainable AI

Using Case Facts to Predict Penalty with Deep Learning.

Automated Extraction of Sentencing Decisions from Court Cases in the Hebrew Language

Prison Term Prediction on Criminal Case Description with Deep Learning

Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A reality rooted perspective

Judicial Decision-Making and Explainable AI (XAI) – Insights from the Japanese Judicial System

Exploring explainable AI in the tax domain

Uniting Machine Intelligence, Brain and Behavioural Sciences to Assist Criminal Justice

The Case Against Explainability