Abstract:Background: While health advocacy is an established physician role, most of the educational attention to advocacy has been at the individual patient level. Public advocacy-efforts to effect change at the level of communities, populations or society-remains a poorly defined concept whose educational foundation is underdeveloped. To enrich our understanding of public advocacy, we explored how professionals in two disciplines-medicine and law-have approached its tasks and experienced its challenges. Methods: Using constructivist grounded theory, we interviewed 18 professionals (nine physicians, eight lawyers and one qualified in both disciplines) who engage in public advocacy. We used constant comparison throughout an iterative process of data collection and analysis to develop an understanding of what it means to be a professional in the public domain. Results: Public advocacy work occurs at the intersection of personal and professional identities. Lawyers perceived public advocacy as an embedded element of their professional identity, while physicians more often viewed it as outside their core professional scope. Nonetheless, professional identity influenced how both groups conducted their work. Physicians were more likely to draw on professional attitudes (e.g. their orientation towards evidence and their trusted social position), while lawyers were more likely to draw on professional skills (e.g. building an argument and litigating test cases). The work requires courage and often demands that individuals tolerate personal and professional risk. Conclusion: While medicine has enshrined advocacy in its competency frameworks, it is the legal profession whose practitioners more fully embrace advocacy as intrinsic to professional identity, suggesting that roles are difficult to engineer or impose. Collaboration across public-facing professions like medicine and law creates opportunities to reimagine public advocacy, to identify the skills required to do it well and to refresh educational strategies.

The reliability and validity of the revised Diabetes Family Conflict Scale questionnaire, in a sample of Swedish children

New renin inhibitors with hydrophilic C-terminus.

Teaching Mindfulness in Class, Bringing Mindfulness to Life: A Tribute to Charity Scott's Impact on Mental Health and Well-Being in Law School and Legal Practice

The courage to advocate: How two professions approach public advocacy work

Unbending the Light: Changing Laws and Policies to Make Transgender Health Visible; Reflections of an Advocate

Off the shelf and into the community: Advocacy and public scholarship

Beyond the Hospital Walls: The Role of the Ethicist in Community Healthcare Settings

Angela M. Eikenberry, Roseanne M. Mirabella, and Billie Sandberg (eds.), Reframing Nonprofit Organizations: Democracy, Inclusion, and Social Change. Melvin & Leigh

Cultivating Conscience: How Good Laws Make Good People

Odyssey of a community psychologist practitioner

Eat the Cake, Take the Trip, Buy the Shoes

We Get by with a Little Help from Our Friends: Progress Toward the Future and an Invitation to Approach Policy Questions Through Novel Perspectives

Association of visfatin with chronic kidney disease in a cohort of patients with and without diabetes.

Schools, student health and family welfare: Exploring teachers’ work as boundary spanners

Society, Social Structures, and Community in Clinical Ethics

Students encouraging other students' learning: Leadership shared metacognition in practice

Two mutations of the Gsα gene in two Japanese patients with sporadic pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia

Ethical Philanthropy in the era of Patient-Centric, Value-Based Health Care

Estimating Metallothionein in Small Root Samples of Agrostis gigantea and Zea mays Exposed to Cadmium.

Bridging the Gap1

The Role of the Lawyer as Deal Maker in Health Care Acquisitions: From Amoral to Immoral?