Allergic contact dermatitis from diazo paper

L. Condé‐Salazar,L. Romero,D. Guimaraens
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1982.tb04190.x
1982-06-01
Contact Dermatitis
Abstract:We were surprised to find that it was not only the varnish used by the patient that contained epoxy resin but that other varnishes also contained it with oligomers of a molecular weight between 340 and 908. There was no mention of epoxy resin on the label, except for one product which was manufacturered in the USA. New cases of sensitization to epoxy resin are being recognised more frequently, most of them of occupational origin, due to the increasing use of these resins in various industries (2). Less often have we been able to check on the increasing rate of non-occupational sensitization. Fregert & Rorsman (3) reported 13 cases of a non-occupational epoxy resin dermatitis. Although we think that turpentine is the major allergen responsible for this man's dermatitis, the use of epoxy resin in the varnish has had something to do with the pathogenesis and development of the dermatitis. He is now able to· continue work and is free of dermatitis. He has replaced turpentine with white spirit, which is a petroleum product containing a mixture of hydrocarbons. As a final varnish, he is now using 'mastic' which has been used since ancient times and has a very low sensitization capacity; it is obtained from a plant (Pistacia Lentiscul. L) and contains Terpeno (2%), mastic acid (80-90%) and masticine (10-20%). We have not found any previous report of epoxy resin dermatitis from this source. It may explain some cases of non-occupational sensitization in people who paint as a hobby.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?