RADIATION‐INDUCED ULCERATION OF THE STOMACH SECONDARY TO HEPATIC EMBOLIZATION WITH RADIOACTIVE YTTRIUM MICROSPHERES IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLON CANCER

N. Matsuhashi,A. Nakajima,S. Nomura,M. Kaminishi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2003.03322.x

2004-03-01

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Effects of strength training on serum lipid levels in prepubertal boys.

J. Macmahon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHPEDI.1988.02150050018007

1988-05-01

A M A Journal of Diseases of Children

Abstract:Sir .—In their study of serum cholesterol levels in prepubertal boys before and after a strength-training program, Weltman et al 1 concluded that "a concentric strength-training program in prepubertal boys results in a reduction in serum cholesterol levels while maintaining the HDL-C [high-density lipoprotein cholesterol] level." This interesting study appears to have several methodologic problems that make such a conclusion difficult to justify. Nineteen subjects were enrolled in a strength-training program while ten others were assigned to a control group. Nowhere is the reader told whether group assignment was randomized or whether such characteristics as body mass index, age, diet, and extracurricular habits of the two groups were similar. Prior to any intervention, the group assigned to the exercise program had a mean ( ± SD) serum cholesterol level substantially higher than that of the control group (5.09 ± 1.01 mmol/L [197.2 ± 39.3 mg/dL] vs 4.14 ± 0.56 mmol/L [159.9
Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy and its predictors among diabetic patients on follow-up at public hospitals in Nekemte Town, Western Ethiopia

Aberash Olani Kuta,Nagasa Dida

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305200

IF: 3.7

2024-07-08

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background: Understanding and addressing the concerns of vaccine-hesitant individuals, including those with chronic diseases, is key to increasing vaccine acceptance and uptake. However, in Ethiopia, there is limited evidence on the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and predictor variables among diabetic patients. Hence, the study aimed to assess Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Predictor variables among Diabetic Patients on Follow-Up at Public Hospitals in Nekemte Town, Western Ethiopia. Method: Facility based cross sectional study was conducted among 422 diabetic patients attending public hospitals at Nekemte Town, Western Ethiopia between January, to February, 2023. Study participants were recruited by systematic random sampling. The data were collected interviewee administered pre-tested structured survey questioner. The collected data were entered and cleaned using Epi-Data software 4.6 version. The cleaned data were analyzed using SPSS. 25.0 Statical software. Descriptive statistics like frequency, mean and percentage, and binary logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy and association between variables were declared at p-value of 0.05. Result: The overall magnitude of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was 15.2% (95% CI: 11.6-18.7). The top three listed reasons for the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were: negative information about the vaccine (32.90%), lack of enough information (21.80%), and vaccine safety concern (19.40%). The hesitancy of the COVID-19 vaccination uptake among diabetes patients was independently influenced by age between 40-49 (Adjusted Odd Ratio [AOR] = 4.52(1.04-19.66)), having vaccine awareness (AOR = 0.029(0.001-0.86)), having a great deal of trust on vaccine development (AOR = 0.028(0.002-0.52)), and a fear amount trust (AOR = 0.05(0.003-0.79)) on the vaccine preparation, vaccinated for COVID-19 (AOR = 0.13(0.04-0.51)), perceived exposure to COVID-19 infection after having the vaccine as strongly agree/agree (AOR = 0.03(0.01-0.17))and neither agree nor disagree (AOR = 0.07(0.02-0.30)). Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among diabetic patients was relatively low. The identified independent predictors were age, vaccine awareness, COVID-19 vaccination history, awareness on vaccine preparation and exposure status to COVID-19 infection. The relevant agency should focus on efforts to translating these high levels of vaccine acceptance into actual uptake, through targeting identifying predictor variables and vaccine availability for a high-risk diabetes patient.
Understanding the COVID-19 vaccine uptake, acceptance, and hesitancy in Ethiopia and Tanzania: a scoping review

Esayas Kebede Gudina,Florida Joseph Muro,Norman Jonas Kyala,Tsegaye Melaku,Jane Brandt Sørensen,Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch,Zeleke Mekonnen,Tania Aase Dræbel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1422673

IF: 5.2

2024-11-13

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Background: The development and implementation of COVID-19 vaccines have been a breakthrough in controlling the pandemic. However, the vaccination coverage in most low-income countries remains very low due to critical vaccine shortage and profound hesitancy. In this scoping review, we aimed to assess COVID-19 vaccine uptake, acceptance, and hesitancy in Ethiopia and Tanzania. Methods: The search was made in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Only original research articles focusing on vaccine acceptance and hesitancy were included. The studies selected for a full read were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Findings: A total of 76 articles were included in the study, with 74 of them coming from Ethiopia. The study found an increasing trend in vaccine uptake over time. However, there was also an increase in hesitancy and a decline in willingness to receive the vaccine. The willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine in Ethiopia ranged from 18.5 to 88%. The main reasons for "vaccine hesitancy" included fear of side effects, concerns about long-term safety, doubts about vaccine effectiveness, lack of information, vaccine fast-tracking, and religious beliefs. The study also found that younger individuals, females, and pregnant women were less willing to receive the vaccine. The adverse events reported among vaccinated individuals were mostly mild. Most of the studies operationalised vaccine acceptance-hesitancy as dichotomous variables. However, the historical, political, and socio-cultural context in which vaccine acceptance and hesitancy occur was not given any attention. While there is a good amount of data from Ethiopia describing patterns of vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among different populations over time, there is limited information from Tanzania due to the late arrival of the vaccine and limited published articles. Conclusion: We have observed a paradox involving two seemingly conflicting trends: an increase in vaccination rates/coverage and "anti-vax." Most studies have simplified vaccine acceptance-hesitancy as an "either-or" incident, without considering its dynamic nature and occurrence within a broader political, social, and cultural context. Therefore, it is crucial to explore approaches that can enhance our understanding of the vaccine acceptance-hesitancy phenomenon, in order to improve vaccine trust and uptake.

public, environmental & occupational health
Vaccine hesitancy and related factors among South African adults in 2021: unpacking uncertainty versus unwillingness

Ronel Sewpaul,Sibusiso Sifunda,Razia Gaida,Tholang Mokhele,Inbarani Naidoo,Sasiragha Priscilla Reddy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1233031

2023-11-03

Abstract:Background: Amidst widespread public health recommendations and availability of COVID-19 vaccinations, half of South African adults are vaccinated against COVID-19. This study investigated the socio-behavioral determinants of vaccine hesitancy in South Africa, where vaccine hesitancy was separated into unwilling ness and uncertainty to take a COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: Data was collected from a large-scale public survey during June-October 2021 that included online and telephonic surveys. Vaccination hesitancy was based on the question "When available, would you take the COVID 19 vaccine?," with responses categorized into those who were willing, unwilling, and uncertain about taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Multinomial regression examined the association between socio-behavioral variables and vaccine hesitancy. Results: Overall, 73.8% reported they would definitely or probably take the vaccine, 16.4% were uncertain and 9.9% reported they probably or definitely would not (n = 16,988). Younger age, White and Colored population groups, no influenza vaccination history, previous vaccination refusal, knowing someone who experienced a serious vaccination side-effect, misperceptions about vaccine benefits, cultural or religious discouragement from taking a COVID-19 vaccination, lack of governmental confidence, concerns about side-effects, perceived lack of safety information, and lack of trust in the pharmaceutical industry and in the information from health care providers were all associated with higher odds of being uncertain and unwilling to take a COVID-19 vaccination. Strengths of association for unwillingness and uncertainty varied by the explanatory variables. Concern about effectiveness due to fast development was associated with uncertainty to take the vaccine but not with unwillingness. Concerns about side-effects had stronger associations with uncertainty than with unwillingness, while previous vaccine refusal, misperceptions of the protective benefits of vaccines, White population group, religious/cultural discouragement, and lack of trust in the pharmaceutical industry and health care providers' information had stronger associations with unwillingness than uncertainty. Conclusion: The determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy should be addressed in interventions to improve vaccine uptake. Public health interventions and health communication can be prioritized and tailored to the different forms of vaccination hesitancy.
Corona virus vaccine hesitancy among higher education students in Adama City, Oromia, Ethiopia

Dawit Abebe,Tewodros Mengistu,Enku Afework Demssie,Sinetibeb Mesfin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1364225

IF: 5.2

2024-03-26

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Background: Vaccination stands as the most efficient approach for managing the continued transmission of infections and preventing the emergence of novel variants. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy poses a significant burden in the fight to achieve herd immunity. Methods: A cross-sectional study, based on institutional parameters, was conducted among a cohort of 530 higher education students, selected via a simple random sampling method. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique from February to March 2022. Structured questionnaire data were gathered and subsequently analyzed using SPSS version 21. The strength of the association between various factors and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was assessed using the odds ratio along with its 95% confidence interval. Statistical significance was deemed to be present at a p -value of < 0.05. Result: The prevalence of coronavirus vaccine hesitancy was 47.5%. The factors that were found to be significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were residential address (AOR = 2.398, 95% CI: 1.476–3.896); agreeing with leaders and groups that do not support COVID-19 vaccination (AOR = 2.292, 95% CI: 1.418–3.704); coming from a community whose leaders support COVID-19 vaccination for young adults (AOR = 0.598, 95% CI: 0.381–0.940), and believing that COVID-19 vaccines are safe (AOR = 0.343,95% CI: 0.168–0.701). Conclusion: Approximately five out of 10 students who participated in this study were hesitant to get vaccinated against coronavirus. Incorporating messages and initiatives into local plans to specifically target the factors identified in this study is imperative for substantially increasing the COVID-19 vaccine uptake among students in higher education institutions.

public, environmental & occupational health
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adults in Liberia, April–May 2021

Lily M. Sanvee-Blebo,Peter A. Adewuyi,Faith K. Whesseh,Obafemi Joseph Babalola,Himiede W. Wilson-Sesay,Godwin E. Akpan,Chukwuma David Umeokonkwo,Peter Clement,Maame Amo-Addae

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297089

IF: 3.7

2024-04-17

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background Vaccination is one of the most cost-effective public health interventions used to prevent diseases in susceptible populations. Despite the established efficacy of vaccines, there are many reasons people are hesitant about vaccination, and these reasons could be complex. This rapid survey estimated the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and potentially contributing factors in Montserrado and Nimba counties in Liberia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults living in Liberia. The relationship between vaccine non-acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics was examined using chi-square statistics. The variables with a p-value less than 0.2 at the bivariate analysis were modelled in a binary logistic regression at a 5% level of significance. The adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval are reported. Results There were 877 participants in the study. Majority were 25–34 years of age (30.4%, 272/877), females (54.05%, 474/877), and Christians (85.2%, 747/877). Most of the participants were aware of the COVID-19 vaccine (75%, 656/877), single (41.4%, 363/877), self-employed (37.51%, 329/877), and live-in rural communities (56.1%, 492/877). Vaccine hesitancy was (29.1%, 255/877; 95% CI:26.2–32.2). Vaccine hesitancy was greater among adults living in urban areas (41%) compared to persons living in rural communities (59%) (aOR; 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1–2.1) and respondents aged 45–54 years (aOR:0.5; 95% CI: 0.2–0.9; p = 0.043) were 50% less likely to be hesitant to COVID-19 vaccination compared to those more than 55 years. The most common source of information was the media (53%, 492/877) and the main reason for being hesitant was a need for more information about the vaccine and its safety (84%, 215/255). Conclusions The majority of study participants were aware of the COVID-19 vaccines and their most common source of information was the media (television, radio). Vaccine hesitancy was moderate. This could pose a challenge to efforts to control the spread of the COVID–19 pandemic. Therefore, the health authorities should provide more health education on the importance of vaccines and their safety to the populace.

multidisciplinary sciences
Willingness to Embrace COVID-19 Vaccination Amongst Residents in a Low-Income Nation: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study on a Limited Cohort

Manaye Tamrie Derseh,Abyou Seyfu Ambaye,Ashagrachew Tewabe Yayehrad,Abinet Abebe,Yohannes Wobie,Erkihun Assefa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241237697

2024-01-01

Abstract:The global pandemic had a significant impact on countries around the world, both politically and socioeconomically. It is crucial that swift decisions and actions need to be taken to prevent negative outcomes. The development of vaccines has emerged as a potential necessity for countries worldwide. Ethiopia began vaccinating health professionals and high-risk individuals in March 2021, according to a report from the World Health Organization citing the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health. This study aimed to assess the determinants of willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine among Debre Markos city administration residents. A community-based cross-sectional study design was employed to recruit 845 individuals as a sample. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used as statistical analysis techniques. Among the total 845 samples, the overall response rate was 98.34%. Two hundred forty-two participants showed their willingness to receive vaccines. Age (AOR = 2.56; 95%CI = [1.87-3.23]), sex (Female) (AOR = 3.45; 95% CI = [2.07-5.26]), having children (AOR = 1.21; 95% CI = [1.02-1.90]), and Chronic Disease (AOR = 2.98; 95% CI = [1.67-3.50]) were significantly and positively associated with willingness to receive COVID 19 vaccines at 95% CI. Although most of the participants were aware of the possibility of COVID-19 to cause fever; and its transmission, only a small percentage of the total participants showed their willingness to receive the vaccine if it was available to them. Elderly and individuals with chronic diseases need to get a priority of taking those vaccinations.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Understanding Sociodemographic Factors and Reasons Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitance among Adults in Tanzania: A Mixed-Method Approach

Hajirani M. Msuya,Gumi A. Mrisho,Abdallah Mkopi,Mwifadhi Mrisho,Omar N. Lweno,Ali M. Ali,Ali H. Said,Michael G. Mihayo,Sara S. Mswata,Anneth M. Tumbo,Grace Mhalu,Said A. Jongo,Kamaka R. Kassim,Gloria D. Nyaulingo,Silas G. Temu,Paul E. Kazyoba,Hussein Haruna,Rogath Kishimba,Hellen Kassa,Grace W. Mwangoka,Salim Abdulla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.23-0229

2023-09-11

Abstract:Although studies on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy are being undertaken widely worldwide, there is limited evidence in Tanzania. This study aims to assess the sociodemographic factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and the reasons given by unvaccinated study participants. We conducted a mixed-method cross-sectional study with two components—health facilities and communities—between March and September 2022. A structured questionnaire and in-depth interviews were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. A total of 1,508 individuals agreed to participate in the survey and explained why they had not vaccinated against COVID-19. Of these participants, 62% indicated they would accept the vaccine, whereas 38% expressed skepticism. In a multivariate regression analysis, adult study participants 40 years and older were significantly more likely to report not intending to be vaccinated (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.01–1.61; P = 0.04) than youth and middle-aged study participants between 18 and 40 years. Furthermore, female study participants had a greater likelihood of not intending to be vaccinated (AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.19–1.90; P = 0.001) than male study participants. The study identified fear of safety and short-term side effects, and lack of trust of the COVID-19 vaccine; belief in spiritual or religious views; and belief in local remedies and other precautions or preventive measures as the major contributors to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Tanzania. Further empirical studies are needed to confirm these findings and to understand more fully the reasons for vaccine hesitancy in different demographic groups.

public, environmental & occupational health,tropical medicine
Can metformin be used in type 1 diabetes with insulin resistance: Experience from tertiary care health center.

A. Pandey,M. Gutch,Madhukar Mittal,Sukriti Kumar,S. Razi

Abstract:
COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Associated Factors Among College Students in Dessie City, Northeastern Ethiopia

Gete Berihun,Zebader Walle,Daniel Teshome,Leykun Berhanu,Mohammed Derso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S381151

2022-08-13

Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

Abstract:Gete Berihun, 1, &ast Zebader Walle, 2, &ast Daniel Teshome, 3, &ast Leykun Berhanu, 1 Mohammed Derso 4 1 Department of Environmental Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia; 2 Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia; 3 Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia; 4 Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Gete Berihun; Daniel Teshome, Email ; Background: The COVID-19 vaccine is regarded as an effective measure for reducing the pandemic's impact. But, COVID-19 disease burden reduction efforts are being affected by the rising vaccine resistance. Objective: To assess the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and associated factors among college students in Dessie city, Northeastern Ethiopia. Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was carried out among college students in Dessie town from July 1– 20, 2021. The association between independent and dependent variables was assessed by binary logistic regression analysis using crude odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio. Variables having p values of less than 0.05 at the 95% confidence interval were regarded as potential determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Results: A total of 422 college students participated in the study with a response rate of 95.6%. More than half 226 (56.2%) of the participants had willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccine. Respondents who had history of chronic medical illness (AOR: 4.340, 95% CI: 1.166, 16.149), training on COVID-19 vaccine (AOR: 4.755, 95% CI: 2.606, 6.674), history of regular vaccine uptake (AOR: 2.534, 95% CI: 1.412, 4.549), perception of COVID-19 severity (AOR: 4.109, 95% CI: 2.190, 7.710), perception that COVID-19 can be prevented by vaccine (AOR: 2.420, 95% CI: 1.160, 5.049), and development of herd immunity against COVID-19 vaccines (AOR: 2.566, 95% CI: 1.431, 4.599) were factors significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Conclusion: The acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among college students was low. The history of chronic medical illness, training on COVID-19 vaccine, history of vaccine uptake, perception that COVID-19 can be prevented by vaccine, perception of herd immunity development against COVID-19, and severity of COVID 19 infection were factors significantly associated with the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine. Hence, it is necessary to promote COVID-19 vaccination among college students through health education and vaccine outreach. Keywords: COVID-19, vaccine, acceptance, college students, Ethiopia The global pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) continues to impose enormous burdens on morbidity and mortality. 1–3 COVID-19 is a fatal viral disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus strain that has spread all over the world and has become a serious public health problem. 4 On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) pronounced the COVID-19 to be pandemic. At present, the illness has impacted 223 nations, producing more than 133.978 million recorded cases and 2.9 million fatalities. 5,6 COVID-19 typically affects the respiratory system with a range of symptoms from asymptomatic to severe respiratory distress syndrome. 7,8 The elderly and people with a history of co-morbid conditions like hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and kidney disease are typically more fatally affected by this virus. 9,10 Due to their poor health infrastructure and training, African countries are more vulnerable to the spread of disease. 11 Additionally, their inability to quickly receive the vaccination raises the danger of disease spread. 12 Vaccination programs for Africans may be further delayed by vaccine-related expenses and transfer problems until late 2021 or early 2022. The majority of globally recognized vaccinations were purchased by developed nations. 13 Different COVID-19 prevention strategies, including the implementation of lockdowns and quarantines, social isolation tactics, constant facemasking, travel limitations, and personal hygiene were implemented across the world. 14–17 However, these have had a significant negative impact on people's health and psychological well-being as well as a dramatic drop in the world economy. 18 International efforts to create an effective prevention strategy to -Abstract Truncated-

health care sciences & services
Knowledge, attitudes and demographic drivers for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Malawi

Yamikani Ndasauka,Halima Sumayya Twabi,Jimmy Kainja,Anthony Mavuto Gunde,Catherine Makhumula-Mtimuni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60042-5

IF: 4.6

2024-04-27

Scientific Reports

Abstract:This study assessed the association among knowledge, attitudes and uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Malawi, examining demographic factors influencing these variables. The study employed a quantitative research design. It thus sampled 394 participants from Malawi's three districts of Zomba, Dowa and Nkhatabay. Results showed that 163 (41.4%) participants had low levels of knowledge of COVID-19 vaccine, 231 (58.6%) had high levels of knowledge, 237 (60.2%) had a positive attitude, and 156 (39.8%) had a negative attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine. On vaccine uptake, the study found that only 29 (17%) male and 52 (23%) female participants had received the vaccine. Further, participants with low levels of knowledge and a positive attitude towards the vaccine were 5.9 times more likely ( p -value = 0.001) to be vaccinated than those with low levels of knowledge and negative attitudes towards the vaccine. On the other hand, those with high knowledge and a positive attitude towards the vaccine were 8.2 times more likely ( p -value < 0.001) to be vaccinated compared to those with low knowledge and negative attitudes towards the vaccine. The findings highlight the importance of vaccine-related knowledge and attitudes in shaping uptake and reveal disparities across demographic groups. To improve vaccination coverage in Malawi, targeted interventions focusing on enhancing COVID-19 vaccine knowledge, addressing attitudinal barriers, and countering misinformation are needed. Strategies should be tailored to reach populations with lower uptake, such as males, younger adults, and those with lower education levels. Strengthening public health messaging, engaging community leaders, and building trust in healthcare systems are crucial for promoting widespread acceptance and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in Malawi.

multidisciplinary sciences
Revisiting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy around the world using data from 23 countries in 2021

Jeffrey V. Lazarus,Katarzyna Wyka,Trenton M. White,Camila A. Picchio,Kenneth Rabin,Scott C. Ratzan,Jeanna Parsons Leigh,Jia Hu,Ayman El-Mohandes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31441-x

IF: 16.6

2022-07-01

Nature Communications

Abstract:Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact daily life, including health system operations, despite the availability of vaccines that are effective in greatly reducing the risks of death and severe disease. Misperceptions of COVID-19 vaccine safety, efficacy, risks, and mistrust in institutions responsible for vaccination campaigns have been reported as factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy. This study investigated COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy globally in June 2021. Nationally representative samples of 1,000 individuals from 23 countries were surveyed. Data were analyzed descriptively, and weighted multivariable logistic regressions were used to explore associations with vaccine hesitancy. Here, we show that more than three-fourths (75.2%) of the 23,000 respondents report vaccine acceptance, up from 71.5% one year earlier. Across all countries, vaccine hesitancy is associated with a lack of trust in COVID-19 vaccine safety and science, and skepticism about its efficacy. Vaccine hesitant respondents are also highly resistant to required proof of vaccination; 31.7%, 20%, 15%, and 14.8% approve requiring it for access to international travel, indoor activities, employment, and public schools, respectively. For ongoing COVID-19 vaccination campaigns to succeed in improving coverage going forward, substantial challenges remain to be overcome. These include increasing vaccination among those reporting lower vaccine confidence in addition to expanding vaccine access in low- and middle-income countries.

multidisciplinary sciences
COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy in the United States: A Rapid National Assessment

Jagdish Khubchandani,Sushil Sharma,James H. Price,Michael J. Wiblishauser,Manoj Sharma,Fern J. Webb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-020-00958-x

2021-01-03

Journal of Community Health

Abstract:Given the results from early trials, COVID-19 vaccines will be available by 2021. However, little is known about what Americans think of getting immunized with a COVID-19 vaccine. Thus, the purpose of this study was to conduct a comprehensive and systematic national assessment of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a community-based sample of the American adult population. A multi‐item valid and reliable questionnaire was deployed online via mTurk and social media sites to recruit U.S. adults from the general population. A total of 1878 individuals participated in the study where the majority were: females (52%), Whites (74%), non-Hispanic (81%), married (56%), employed full time (68%), and with a bachelor's degree or higher (77%). The likelihood of getting a COVID-19 immunization in the study population was: very likely (52%), somewhat likely (27%), not likely (15%), definitely not (7%), with individuals who had lower education, income, or perceived threat of getting infected being more likely to report that they were not likely/definitely not going to get COVID-19 vaccine (i.e., vaccine hesitancy). In unadjusted group comparisons, compared to their counterparts, vaccine hesitancy was higher among African-Americans (34%), Hispanics (29%), those who had children at home (25%), rural dwellers (29%), people in the northeastern U.S. (25%), and those who identified as Republicans (29%). In multiple regression analyses, vaccine hesitancy was predicted significantly by sex, education, employment, income, having children at home, political affiliation, and the perceived threat of getting infected with COVID-19 in the next 1 year. Given the high prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, evidence-based communication, mass media strategies, and policy measures will have to be implemented across the U.S. to convert vaccines into vaccinations and mass immunization with special attention to the groups identified in this study.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
Misinformation on COVID-19 Vaccine and Its Associated Factors among Residents in Gondar, Ethiopia, 2022

Mesafint Zewold Jember,Adamu Takele Jemere,Kassahun Dessie Gashu,Adamu Ambachew Shibabaw

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9947720

2024-01-10

BioMed Research International

Abstract:Introduction. In the year 2019, a new strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome emerged in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, causing a new pneumonia outbreak. Misinformation about the coronavirus 2019 vaccine, combined with inequitable vaccine delivery around the world, is the bottleneck of the most promising instruments for ending pandemic. Vaccine confidence and vaccination rate can be affected by misinformation. The majority of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation has been on vaccine development, safety, and effectiveness as well as COVID-19 denial. Hence, this study is aimed at assessing the magnitude of misinformation on the COVID-19 vaccine and associated factor among residents in Gondar, Ethiopia, Method. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May 8 to June 10, 2022, among 844 residents in Gondar town. A multistage cluster sampling method was employed to select study participants. An interview-administered questionnaire was used to collect the required data. The data were entered using EpiData 4.6 and transferred into SPSS version 20 for analysis. Descriptive statistics and bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were done. An adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% CI was used to determine explanatory factors associated with misinformation on the COVID-19 vaccine. Result. The proportion of misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine was found to be 48%. Being male ( AOR=1.48 , 95% CI: 1.03, 2.13), vaccination status (AOR: 7.37, CI: 4.59, 11.83), history of COVID-19 (AOR: 0.21, CI: 0.5, 0.78), health self-efficacy (AOR: 0.6, CI: 0.42, 0.86), perceived severity (AOR: 1.47, CI: 1.02, 2.12), knowledge towards COVID-19 vaccine (AOR: 1.85, CI: 1.28,2.67), and attitude towards COVID-19 (AOR: 1.9, CI: 1.32, 2.76) vaccine were significant factors associated with misinformation on COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusion and Recommendation. The overall proportion of misinformation on the COVID-19 vaccine was found at 48%. Increasing community awareness of the COVID-19 vaccine and clarifying misunderstandings about it through media campaigns may help to lessen the tendency for misinformation in the community.

biotechnology & applied microbiology,medicine, research & experimental
Relationship Between Type of Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Urban Children and Adolescents

R. Luthra,R. Abramovitz,R. Greenberg,Alan Schoor,J. Newcorn,J. Schmeidler,P. Levine,Y. Nomura,C. Chemtob

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508325494

2009-11-01

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract:This study examines the association between trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among 157 help-seeking children (aged 8-17). Structured clinical interviews are carried out, and linear and logistic regression analyses are conducted to examine the relationship between PTSD and type of trauma exposure controlling for age, gender, and ethnicity. Confrontation with traumatic news, witnessing domestic violence, physical abuse, and sexual abuse are each significantly associated with PTSD. Witnessing a crime, being the victim of a crime, and exposure to accidents, fire, or disaster are not associated with PTSD. These findings underscore the association between interpersonal violence and childhood PTSD.
Willingness to take COVID-19 vaccination in low-income countries: Evidence from Ethiopia

Christoph Strupat,Zemzem Shigute,Arjun S. Bedi,Matthias Rieger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264633

IF: 3.7

2022-03-03

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background In low-income countries, vaccination campaigns are lagging, and evidence on vaccine acceptance, a crucial public health planning input, remains scant. This is the first study that reports willingness to take COVID-19 vaccines and its socio-demographic correlates in Ethiopia, Africa’s second most populous country. Methods The analysis is based on a nationally representative survey data of 2,317 households conducted in the informal economy in November 2020. It employs two logistic regression models where the two outcome variables are (i) a household head’s willingness to take a COVID-19 vaccine or not, and (ii) if yes if they would also hypothetically pay (an unspecified amount) for it or not. Predictors include age, gender, education, marital status, income category, health insurance coverage, sickness due to COVID-19, chronic illness, trust in government, prior participation in voluntary activities, urban residence. Results Willingness to take the vaccine was high (88%) and significantly associated with COVID-19 cases in the family, trust in government and pro-social behavior. All other predictors such as gender, education, income, health insurance, chronic illness, urban residence did not significantly predict vaccine willingness at the 5% level. Among those willing to take the vaccine, 33% also answered that they would hypothetically pay (an unspecified amount) for it, an answer that is significantly associated with trust in government, health insurance coverage and income. Conclusion The results highlight both opportunities and challenges. There is little evidence of vaccine hesitancy in Ethiopia among household heads operating in the informal economy. The role played by trust in government and pro-social behavior in motivating this outcome suggests that policy makers need to consider these factors in the planning of COVID-19 vaccine campaigns in order to foster vaccine uptake. At the same time, as the willingness to hypothetically pay for a COVID-19 vaccine seems to be small, fairly-priced vaccines along with financial support are also needed to ensure further uptake of COVID-19 vaccines.

multidisciplinary sciences
DIFFERENT PATTERNS OF VACCINE HESITANCY AMONG OLDER ADULTS BY RACE/ETHNICITY, INCOME, AND EDUCATION

BoRin Kim,Jehoon Jeon,Chung Hyeon Jeong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.3283

2023-12-01

Innovation in Aging

Abstract:Abstract Despite significant efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates, a substantial number of people exhibit vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy is considered as one of the greatest threats to global health but also poses substantial risks to individuals. Moreover, vaccine hesitancy patterns may reflect and perpetuate existing health disparities. This study aims to investigate if specific patterns of vaccine hesitancy exist among older adults across racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups. Our sample included 4,656 respondents aged 65+ who participated in the 2021 Health and Retirement Study Perspectives on the Pandemic that focuses on the first-year pandemic experiences. Latent class analysis and multinomial regression was used to identify vaccine hesitancy patterns and examine the associated factors, adjusting for age, gender, marital status, and self-rated health. Four vaccine hesitancy patterns were identified: no hesitancy (56.7%), mild hesitancy-uncertainty (19.4%), strong hesitancy-personal concerns (12.0%), and strong hesitancy-lack of trust/conspiracy (11.9%). White (RRR=1.659, p<.01), higher income (RRR=1.005, p<.05) and higher education (RRR=1.078, p<.001) were positively associated with no hesitancy. Respondents with higher education (RRR=0.573, p<.05) were less likely to be in the group of mild hesitancy with uncertainty. Hispanics (RRR=0.583, p<.05) and higher education (RRR=0.332, p<.001) were negatively associated with strong hesitancy with personal concerns. African Americans (RRR=2.426, p<.001) and those with lower education (RRR=1.324, p<.001) were more likely to be in the group of strong hesitancy with lack of trust/conspiracy. Our findings show that vaccine hesitancy is not random, which is closely related to social stratification impacting health disparities in this society.
Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Three Communities in the United States and Lebanon

Mohamad Yasmin,Mohamad Ali Tfaily,Rayyan Wazzi Mkahal,Rita Obeid,Rebecca P. Emery,Habiba Hassouna,Mudita Bhugra,Robert A. Bonomo,Zeina A. Kanafani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12061200

IF: 4.5

2024-06-14

Microorganisms

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the significance of vaccine hesitancy in shaping vaccination outcomes. Understanding the factors underpinning COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy is crucial for tailoring effective vaccination strategies. This cross-sectional study, conducted in three communities across the United States and Lebanon, employed surveys to assess respondents’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Among the 7196 participants, comprising 6775 from the US and 422 from Lebanon, vaccine hesitancy rates were comparable at 12.2% and 12.8%, respectively. Notably, a substantial proportion of respondents harbored misconceptions, such as attributing the potential to alter DNA (86.4%) or track individuals (92.8%) to COVID-19 vaccines and believing in the virus’s artificial origins (81%). US participants had more misconceptions about the COVID-19 vaccine, such as altering DNA or causing infertility. Lebanese participants were more likely to question the origins of the virus and the speed of vaccine development. Additionally, US respondents were less worried about infection, while Lebanese respondents were more indecisive but less likely to outright reject the vaccine. Primary determinants of hesitancy included perceptions that the vaccine poses a greater risk than the infection itself (aOR = 8.7 and 9.4, respectively) and negative recommendations from healthcare providers (aOR = 6.5 and 5.4, respectively). Conversely, positive endorsements from healthcare providers were associated with reduced hesitancy (aOR = 0.02 and 0.4, respectively). Targeting healthcare providers to dispel misinformation and elucidate COVID-19 vaccine risks holds promise for enhancing vaccination uptake.

microbiology
Hesitancy in COVID-19 vaccine uptake and its associated factors among the general adult population: a cross-sectional study in six Southeast Asian countries

Roy Rillera Marzo,Waqas Sami,Md. Zakiul Alam,Swosti Acharya,Kittisak Jermsittiparsert,Karnjana Songwathana,Nhat Tan Pham,Titik Respati,Erwin Martinez Faller,Aries Moralidad Baldonado,Yadanar Aung,Sharmila Mukund Borkar,Mohammad Yasir Essar,Sunil Shrestha,Siyan Yi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-021-00393-1

2022-01-05

Tropical Medicine and Health

Abstract:Abstract Background Vaccines are effective and reliable public health interventions against viral outbreaks and pandemics. However, hesitancy regarding the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine is evident worldwide. Therefore, understanding vaccination-related behavior is critical in expanding the vaccine coverage to flatten the infection curve. This study explores the public perception regarding COVID-19 vaccination and identifies factors associated with vaccine hesitancy among the general adult populations in six Southeast Asian countries. Methods Using a snowball sampling approach, we conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study among 5260 participants in Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam between February and May 2021. Binary logistic regression analysis with a backward conditional approach was applied to identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Results Of the total, 50.6% were female, and the median age was 30 years (range: 15–83 years). The majority of the participants believed that vaccination effectively prevents and controls COVID-19 (81.2%), and 84.0% would accept COVID-19 vaccines when they become available. They agreed that health providers’ advice (83.0%), vaccination convenience (75.6%), and vaccine costs (62.8%) are essential for people to decide whether to accept COVID-19 vaccines. About half (49.3%) expressed their hesitancy to receive the COVID-19 vaccines. After adjustment for other covariates, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was significantly associated with age, residential area, education levels, employment status, and family economic status. Participants from Indonesia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam were significantly more likely to express hesitancy in receiving COVID-19 vaccines than those from Philippines. Conclusions In general, participants in this multi-country study showed their optimistic perception of COVID-19 vaccines’ effectiveness and willingness to receive them. However, about half of them still expressed their hesitancy in getting vaccinated. The hesitation was associated with several socioeconomic factors and varied by country. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccination programs should consider these factors essential for increasing vaccine uptake in the populations.
Pandemic fatigue, behavioral intention and predictors of COVID-19 vaccination among individuals living with HIV in Bench Sheko Zone, in Southern Ethiopia, application of TBP: a facility based cross sectional study

Melsew Setegn Alie,Gossa Fetene Abebe,Yilkal Negesse,Desalegn Girma,Amanuel Adugna

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1305777

IF: 5.2

2024-02-28

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Introduction: People living with HIV often face inequalities and negative outcomes, which make them vulnerable. To protect this population and achieve herd immunity, it is crucial for COVID-19 vaccination efforts to prioritize and encourage vaccination among people living with HIV (PLWH). However, in Ethiopia, there is a lack of motivation in this regard. To tackle this issue, a study was conducted in the Bench Sheko Zone of Southwest Ethiopia. The study aimed to assess pandemic fatigue, behavioral intention to get vaccinated, and factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among PLWH in that region. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among individuals living with HIV who were over 18 years old in Bench-Sheko Zone, located in Southwest Ethiopia. The study included a total of 590 participants from four ART healthcare facilities within the zone. The researchers utilized the Theory of Planned Behavior to examine the predictors of intention to use preconception care. Multiple linear regression analysis was employed to determine these predictors, with a p- value of less than 0.05 considered as indicative of a significant association. The final analysis of the study involved the use of linear regression analysis, and the measure of association was presented as the standardized B coefficient following a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Result: In the conducted study, the response rate was an impressive 98%. The researchers aimed to investigate the behavioral intention toward the COVID-19 vaccine, which was found to be 55.7%. The average age of the participants in the study was 34.65 ± 6.67. The study was the assessment of pandemic fatigue, which had a mean value of 17.22 ± 5.28. During the multivariate linear regression analysis, four predictor variables were identified. Among these, three variables, namely subjective norm, pandemic fatigue, and age, positively influenced the behavioral intention toward the COVID-19 vaccine. Comprehending these factors can assist healthcare professionals and policymakers in formulating precise interventions and strategies aimed at enhancing the acceptance and adoption of vaccines. Conclusion: The study indicates that individuals living with HIV have shown lower vaccine intention compared to previous research. The study identifies subjective norm, pandemic control measures, income, and age as predictors of individuals' intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

public, environmental & occupational health

RADIATION‐INDUCED ULCERATION OF THE STOMACH SECONDARY TO HEPATIC EMBOLIZATION WITH RADIOACTIVE YTTRIUM MICROSPHERES IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLON CANCER

Effects of strength training on serum lipid levels in prepubertal boys.

Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy and its predictors among diabetic patients on follow-up at public hospitals in Nekemte Town, Western Ethiopia

Understanding the COVID-19 vaccine uptake, acceptance, and hesitancy in Ethiopia and Tanzania: a scoping review

Vaccine hesitancy and related factors among South African adults in 2021: unpacking uncertainty versus unwillingness

Corona virus vaccine hesitancy among higher education students in Adama City, Oromia, Ethiopia

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adults in Liberia, April–May 2021

Willingness to Embrace COVID-19 Vaccination Amongst Residents in a Low-Income Nation: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study on a Limited Cohort

Understanding Sociodemographic Factors and Reasons Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitance among Adults in Tanzania: A Mixed-Method Approach

Can metformin be used in type 1 diabetes with insulin resistance: Experience from tertiary care health center.

COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Associated Factors Among College Students in Dessie City, Northeastern Ethiopia

Knowledge, attitudes and demographic drivers for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Malawi

Revisiting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy around the world using data from 23 countries in 2021

COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy in the United States: A Rapid National Assessment

Misinformation on COVID-19 Vaccine and Its Associated Factors among Residents in Gondar, Ethiopia, 2022

Relationship Between Type of Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Urban Children and Adolescents

Willingness to take COVID-19 vaccination in low-income countries: Evidence from Ethiopia

DIFFERENT PATTERNS OF VACCINE HESITANCY AMONG OLDER ADULTS BY RACE/ETHNICITY, INCOME, AND EDUCATION

Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Three Communities in the United States and Lebanon

Hesitancy in COVID-19 vaccine uptake and its associated factors among the general adult population: a cross-sectional study in six Southeast Asian countries

Pandemic fatigue, behavioral intention and predictors of COVID-19 vaccination among individuals living with HIV in Bench Sheko Zone, in Southern Ethiopia, application of TBP: a facility based cross sectional study