Anti-ovarian cancer migration and toxicity characteristics of a platinum(IV) pro-drug with axial HDAC inhibitor ligands in zebrafish models

Salma Begum,Scheldon D Irvin,Carol K Cox,Zhouyang Huang,Justin J Wilson,Jerry D Monroe,Yann Gibert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-024-01479-3
2024-10-21
Abstract:Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer related death in the United States. Cisplatin is a platinum-based anti-cancer drug used against ovarian cancer that enters malignant cells and then damages DNA causing cell death. Typically, ovarian cancer cells become resistant to cisplatin making it necessary to increase subsequent dosage, which usually leads to side-effects including irreversible damage to kidney and auditory system tissue. Ovarian cancer resistance is often associated with upregulation of histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes that cause DNA to adopt a closed configuration which reduces the ability of cisplatin to target and damage DNA. Compound B, a platinum(IV) complex with two axial phenylbutyrate (PBA) HDAC inhibitor ligands attached to a cisplatin core, can simultaneously inhibit HDAC activity and damage DNA causing decreased cancer cell viability in cisplatin-sensitive (A2780) and -resistant (A2780cis) ovarian cancer cell lines. However, compound B was not previously evaluated in vivo. As simultaneously inhibiting HDAC-mediated resistance with cisplatin treatment could potentiate the platinum drug's effect, we first confirmed the anti-cancer effect of compound B in the A2780 and A2780cis cell lines using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide spectrophotometric assay. Then, we used zebrafish embryo and transgenic animal models to comparatively analyze the effect of cisplatin, compound B, and controls on general organismal, auditory, and renal system toxicity, and cancer metastasis. We found that lower dosages of compound B (0.3 or 0.6 µM) than of cisplatin (2.0 µM) could cause similar or decreased levels of general, auditory, and renal tissue toxicity, and at 0.6 µM, compound B reduces cancer metastasis more than 2.0 µM cisplatin.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?