Predictive Accuracy of Clinicians Estimates of Death and Recovery after Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Pre-Specified Analysis in INTERACT3 Study

Menglu Ouyang,Lu Ma,Xiaoying Chen,Xia Wang,Laurent Billot,Qiang Li,Alejandra Malavera,Xi Li,Paula Muñoz-Venturelli,Asita De Silva,Thang Huy Nguyen,Kolawole W Wahab,Jeyaraj Dural Pandian,Mohammad Wasay,Octavio Marques Pontes-Neto,Carlos Abanto,Antonio Arauz,Chao You,Xin Hu,Lili Song,Craig S Anderson,INTERACT3 Investigators
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000541985
2024-10-21
Abstract:Introduction: Accurately predicting a patient's prognosis is an important component of decision-making in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to determine clinicians' ability to predict survival, functional recovery, and return to premorbid activities in patients with ICH. Methods: Pre-specified secondary analysis of the third intensive care bundle with blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral hemorrhage trial (INTERACT3), an international, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Clinician perspectives on prognosis were collected at hospital admission and Day 7 (or before discharge). Prognosis questions were the likelihood of (i) survival at 48 h and 6 months, (ii) favorable functional outcome (recovery walking and self-care), and (iii) return to usual activities at 6 months. Clinician predictions were compared with actual outcomes. Results: Most clinician participants were from neurosurgery (75%) with a median of 8 working years (IQR 5-14) of experience. Of the 6,305 randomized patients who survived 48 h, 213 (3.4%) were predicted to die (positive predictive value [PPV] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-0.99). Of 5,435 patients who survived 6 months, 209 (3.8%) were predicted to die (PPV 0.93, 95% CI: 0.92-0.93). Predictions on the favorable functional outcome (PPV 0.54, 95% CI: 0.52-0.56) and satisfied ability to return to usual activities (PPV 0.50, 95% CI: 0.49-0.52) were poor. Prediction accuracy varied by working years and region of practice. Conclusions: In patients with ICH, clinician estimates of death are very good but conversely they are poor in predicting higher levels of functional recovery and activities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?