Abstract:Purpose of the study: Spine stabilization surgery is nowadays one of the most common spinal surgical procedures. Spinopelvic alignment is considered to be an important factor impacting the patients' preoperative diffi culties as well as the outcome of surgery. In our study, the outcomes of stabilization surgeries in patients with lumbar spine disorders were evaluated - especially in those with stenosis and spondylolisthesis, in whom the importance of sagittal parameters were assessed with respect to the patients' clinical outcomes and diffi culties. Material and methods: The study included 50 patients with lumbar spine disorders who had undergone a spine stabilization surgery for a degenerative disease - lumbar spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis between 2015 and 2017. Spino-pelvic radiological parameters and clinical parameters were evaluated using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests. Results: In 38 of 50 patients, who at the end of the follow-up period did not have the PI-LL (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis) mismatch, i.e. PI-LL was ≤10°, a statistically signifi cant difference in pelvic tilt (p=0.049) and sagittal vertical axis (p<0.001) was reported, which was not the case in the remaining patients of the study population. Claudication and OSWESTRY (ODI) showed no statistically signifi cant difference. We have also compared the differences in the number of fused vertebrae and type of stabilization. A signifi cant change was seen in the claudication parameter at 12 and 24 months after surgery (p=0.007, p=0.005), with better outcomes achieved by 360° lumbar fusion compared to posterior lumbar fusion. The improvement of VAS and ODI scores in both the groups over time (from 6.1 to 3.6 or from 6.3 to 3.5 in VAS and from 62 to 32, or from 62 to 30 in ODI) was also statistically signifi cant (p<0.001 in both groups), while when comparing the groups against each other it was statistically insignifi cant. Discussion: The authors confi rmed signifi cant improvement in the studied clinical parameters in all groups of patients (VAS, ODI, claudication), which is consistent with the results of recently published papers. The authors also established the correlation between different radiological parameters in the studied groups. The results do not confi rm the importance of the length or type of instrumentation for the clinical outcomes. This is consistent with the fi ndings of other published manuscripts. The authors failed to confi rm a signifi cant change in clinical parameters in dependence on the matching relationship between the pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis. Conclusions: Proper spinopelvic balance in patients after spinal surgery is a very important indicator of postoperative development and condition, but our cohort showed no statistically signifi cant difference in the clinical outcomes of patients whose postoperative sagittal parameters were unsatisfactory. Key words: sagittal profi le, spine stabilization, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sagittal vertical axis, SVA.

Correlation between sagittal balance and thoracolumbar elastic energy parameters in 42 spines subject to spondylolisthesis or spinal stenosis and 21 normal spines

Biomechanical evaluation of the thoracolumbar spine comparing healthy and irregular thoracic and lumbar curvatures

Effect of Sacral Slope on the Biomechanical Behavior of the Low Lumbar Spine.

Sagittal balance of the spine

Biomechanical In Vitro and Finite Element Study on Different Sagittal Alignment Postures of the Lumbar Spine During Multiaxial Daily Motion

Sagittal Parameters of Spine‐Pelvis‐Hip Joints in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Relationships between Paraspinal Muscle and Spinopelvic Sagittal Balance in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review

Correlation Between Different Sagittal Parameters in Patients with Degenerative Kyphosis

[Sagittal Profi le of the Spine in Patients after Lumbar Stabilisation Surgeries]

A Correlation of Radiographic and Functional Measurements in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis.

Using Skin Markers for Spinal Curvature Quantification in Main Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Explorative Radiographic Study

Correlation Between Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Parameters in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

The compensatory mechanisms for global sagittal balance in degenerative spinal kyphosis patients: a radiological analysis of muscle-skeletal associations

Sagittal spinopelvic parameters in 2-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: A retrospective study

Sagittal Plane Analysis of the Spine and Pelvis in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

An Analysis of the Interactions Between the Spine, Pelvis, and Lower Limbs in Asymptomatic Adults with Limited Pelvic Compensation.

Prediction of trunk muscle activation and spinal forces in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis during simulated trunk motion: A musculoskeletal modelling study

Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Parameters in Patients With Scheuermann's Disease: A Preliminary Study

Analysis of spinopelvic sagittal alignment in adult patients with idiopathic scoliosis

Comprehensive assessment of global spinal sagittal alignment and related normal spinal loads in a healthy population