Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA Assay in Identifying Mutations and Guiding Matched Targeted Therapy in Lung Cancers

Kun Li,Nana Zhang,Bing Xu,Zichen Liu,Dan Zhao,Yujie Dong,Jing Mu,Haifeng Lin,Guangyu Shan,Sihang Gao,Bo Yu,Xiaoxi Pan,Yanrong Wang,Dongxing Zhang,Nanying Che,Xiaoyong Ji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11795549241285238
2024-10-16
Abstract:Background: Tumor genomic profiling has a significant impact on the selection of targeted therapy. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a noninvasive, and reproducible assay compared with tissue biopsy. We aimed to evaluate its utility in identifying mutations and guiding targeted therapy for lung cancer. Methods: A total of 173 lung cancer patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) using a targeted enrichment panel covering 20 lung cancer-related genes. The performance of the ctDNA NGS assay in identifying genetic mutations or alterations was compared with tissue biopsy and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). The treatment response to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapies based on the ctDNA assay results was also assessed. Results: The ctDNA was detected in 61.85% of patients. Tissue mutations were detected in paired ctDNA in 38.57% of cases, while ctDNA mutations were detected in paired tissues in 89.1% of cases. The ctDNA increased the number of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received NCCN-recommended genetic testing by 12%. The concordance between ddPCR and ctDNA was relatively high reaching 99.43%. EGFR T790M/C797S c.G2390C and EGFR T790M/C797S c.T2389A were detected in tissue and ctDNA, respectively, in patient 01015. Moreover, ctDNA assay identified the EGFR T790M mutation, which was missed by tissue biopsy in patient 01149, who developed drug resistance after 1 year of EGFR-TKI therapy. Of the 17 patients who received EGFR-TKI targeted therapies based on the ctDNA NGS results, 12 patients achieved a partial response and two patients had stable disease. Conclusions: The results demonstrated that the ctDNA assay could partially overcome tumor heterogeneity in detecting mutations and provide complementary information on tumor genomic profiles. Moreover, the presence of EGFR mutations in ctDNA could offer valuable guidance for selecting appropriate EGFR-TKI treatment for advanced lung cancer patients. However, it is important to note that the ctDNA NGS assay has certain limitations in fully identifying all genomic alterations present in the tumor.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?