Assessment of Perioperative Protamine Reactions in Patients with Fish Allergies: A Retrospective Observational Study
Mohanad R. Youssef,Eryberto Martinez,Terrique M. Pinnock,Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada,Mark M. Smith,Bradford B. Smith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.024
IF: 2.894
2024-08-27
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Abstract:Objectives This study retrospectively assessed the incidence and severity of perioperative protamine reactions in adult patients with documented history of fish allergy. Design Retrospective, observational. Setting Large, academic tertiary referral center. Participants Adults with fish allergies undergoing surgeries involving protamine, from January 1, 2008, to March 1, 2018. Interventions Perioperative protamine administration in patients with documented fish allergy. Measurements and Main Results We reviewed perioperative protamine and anaphylactic reactions. A diagnosis of anaphylaxis or protamine reaction was based on clinical suspicion, perioperative events, and postoperative evaluations. Among 214 patients, two cases (<1%) of anaphylaxis or protamine reactions occurred. Cardiac procedures were most common (67%). Median intraoperative heparin dosage was 46,000 IU, and protamine dosage was 310 mg. Nearly all patients (99%) were admitted to the ICU postoperatively, with a median hospital stay of 6.5 days [5.2, 14.6]. There were three deaths (1%) within 30 days and 15 (7%) within a year. Conclusions Our study suggests that in patients with history of fish allergy, cross-reactivity with protamine is unlikely, as anaphylaxis and/or protamine reactions were rare among this patient population in the perioperative environment. Based on the findings herein, this study does not recommend avoiding protamine solely based on a history of fish allergy when heparin reversal is required during surgery.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease,respiratory system,anesthesiology