Exploring the interaction mechanisms between cervical carcinoma in situ and antibody-mediated immune responses through Mendelian randomization analysis

Junfei Li,Lihuang He,Qun He,Kaihong Xie,Hui Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01456-5
2024-10-17
Abstract:Objective: This study aims to investigate the causal relationship between cervical carcinoma in situ and antibody-mediated immune responses, providing a scientific basis for the prevention and treatment of cervical carcinoma in situ. Methods: A bidirectional Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach was utilized, leveraging two Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) related to cervical carcinoma in situ and antibody-mediated immune responses to collect Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) data. Multiple statistical methods, including the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, MR-Egger regression, weighted median, and weighted mode, were utilized. Antibody-mediated immune response-related SNPs were used as instrumental variables (IVs) for a forward MR analysis of cervical carcinoma in situ, while cervical carcinoma in situ-related SNPs served as IVs for a reverse MR analysis of antibody-mediated immune responses. Results: The forward MR analysis revealed significant causal associations between two SNPs, GCST90006901 (P = 0.012, OR (95%CI) = 1.167(1.034-1.317)) and GCST90006909 (P < 0.001, OR (95%CI) = 1.805(1.320-2.467)), within antibody-mediated immune responses and the occurrence of cervical carcinoma in situ. The reverse MR analysis demonstrated that cervical carcinoma in situ exerts influence on multiple SNPs associated with antibody-mediated immune responses. Specifically, GCST90006891 (P = 0.018, OR (95%CI) = 1.164(1.027-1.319)) and GCST90006894 (P = 0.048, OR (95%CI) = 1.074 (1.001-1.153)) showed positive effects, while GCST90006899 (P = 0.022, OR (95%CI) = 0.935(0.882-0.990)) and GCST90006911 (P = 0.0193, OR (95%CI) = 1.226(1.034-1.454)) exhibited distinct trends of influence. Conclusion: The Mendelian Randomization analysis indicates a clear causal relationship between antibody-mediated immune responses and the prevalence of cervical carcinoma in situ, with cervical carcinoma in situ also exerting a certain degree of influence on antibody-mediated immune responses. This finding provides important insights into the interaction mechanism between the two and suggests avenues for developing effective prevention and control strategies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?