Identification of PANoptosis Subtypes to Assess the Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Bioinformatics Combined Machine Learning Study
Xiaofeng Zhou,Bolin Wang,Di Wu,Lu Gao,Zhihua Wan,Ruifeng Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/0115680096322045240902103219
2024-10-14
Abstract:Background: PANoptosis, a novelty mechanism of cell death involving crosstalk between apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis, is strongly associated with tumor cell death and immunotherapy efficacy. However, its relevance in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains to be elucidated. Methods: In this study, we acquired 18 PANoptosis-related differentially expressed gene (PRDEG) of LUAD. Based on these genes, LUAD samples were identified with different sub-types by unsupervised clustering. Next, we compared the differences between the subtypes, including clinical features, immune microenvironment, and potentially sensitive drugs. Further-more, we used machine learning to identify hub prognostic PRDEGs, construct a risk score, and validate it on other external datasets. We incorporated the patient's clinical information and risk score into the proportional hazards model and lasso-cox models to find key prognostic features and constructed five prognostic models. The best model was identified via the area under the curve and validated on an external dataset. Results: LUAD patients were divided into two clusters named C1 and C2, respectively. The C2 cluster exhibited shorter survival time, more advanced tumor stage, higher suppressive immune cell scores, such as dendritic cells, and higher expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints, such as LAG3 and CD86. TIMP1, CAV1, and CD69 were recognized as key prognostic factors, and risk scores predicted survival with significant differences in the external validation set. Risk score and N-stage were identified as critical prognostic features. The Coxph model outper-formed other machine learning clinical models. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year time-ROCs in the exter-nal validation set were 0.55, 0.59, and 0.60, respectively. Conclusion: We demonstrated the potential of PANoptosis-based molecular clustering and prognostic features in predicting the survival of patients with LUAD as well as the tumor mi-croenvironment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?