Hormonal and neuropsychological evaluation of two 47,XYY patients with pituitary abnormalities
Teresa Lettiero,E. Giudice,F. Imperati,A. Ciao,D. Capalbo,M. Salerno
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32123
2008-02-01
Abstract:Sex chromosome aneuploidies, 47,XXY and 47,XYY, are the most common chromosome abnormalities observed in the general male population. 47,XYY has an estimated incidence of 1 per 1,000 live-births [Abramsky et al., 2001]. The clinical features of patients with 47,XYY karyotype can be subtle and variable. Generally, the patients are physically normal in infancy [Buyse, 1990], with phenotypic characteristics becoming increasingly apparent over time. Patients are usually tall and thin and may have delayed speech, lower cognitive function (IQ), hyperactivity, learning disabilities, and other central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities (such as intentional tremor and hypotonia) [Buyse, 1990; Linden et al., 1996; Jones, 1997; Abramsky et al., 2001]. However, several patients with an XYY constitution and a normal phenotype have also been described [Hauschka et al., 1962; Hunter et al., 1968; Jacobs et al., 1968; Linden et al., 1996]. The gonadal function of 47,XYY males is usually normal [BeneZech and Noel, 1985; Linden et al., 1996]; however a great variability in plasma testosterone and gonadotropins levels has been reported [Ishida et al., 1979; Rivera et al., 1979; Schiavi et al., 1984; BeneZech and Noel, 1985]. Other features such as hypospadias, small and undescended testicles [Buyse, 1990], renal abnormalities, epilepsy and/or abnormal electroencephalograms [Forsmann, 1967] and brain abnormalities at the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in particular abnormalities of the ventricles [Warwick et al., 1999] corpus callosum and cerebellum [Brun and Gustavson, 1972; Hakola and Iivanainen, 1978], have also been described. We report on two boys with 47,XYY karyotype, with detailed neuropsychological and hypothalamic–pituitary evaluation. They exhibited abnormalities of the pituitary gland that had not been described before. Patient 1 was referred to our department for mental retardation at the age of 12.3 years. He was born at term after an uncomplicatedpregnancy by caesarean delivery from unrelated parents. His family and neonatal history were unremarkable. His language and motor skills were slightly delayed (first sounds at 12 months and walking at 18 months). By 3 years of age, he was mildly overweight. The father is a bluecollar worker and the mother is a housewife, both of them have a middle school education. At the time of our evaluation, Patient 1’s stature was 154.6 cm which was normal for his age (50th–75th centile) [Cacciari et al., 2002] and appropriate in relation to his target height [Tanner et al., 1966]. He weighed 59.7 kg and had a slightly elevated BMI of 25.9 (90th–97th centile) [Cacciari et al., 2002]. Physical examination revealed bilateral gynecomastia, and convergent strabismus of left eye, malocclusion, and long, thin fingers. In accordance with age, genitalia were prepubertal. Patient 2 was referred to our department at 16 years of age for mental retardation, tall stature, seizures, and obesity and pituitary microadenoma. He was born at term from unrelated parents after an uncomplicated pregnancy by caesarean delivery.