The G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor Agonist G-1 Mediates Antitumor Effects by Activating Apoptosis Pathways and Regulating Migration and Invasion in Cervical Cancer Cells

Abigail Gaxiola-Rubio,Luis Felipe Jave-Suárez,Christian David Hernández-Silva,Adrián Ramírez-de-Arellano,Julio César Villegas-Pineda,Marisa de Jesús Lizárraga-Ledesma,Moisés Ramos-Solano,Carlos Daniel Diaz-Palomera,Ana Laura Pereira-Suárez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193292
2024-09-27
Abstract:Background/objectives: Estrogens and HPV are necessary for cervical cancer (CC) development. The levels of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) increase as CC progresses, and HPV oncoproteins promote GPER expression. The role of this receptor is controversial due to its anti- and pro-tumor effects. This study aimed to determine the effect of GPER activation, using its agonist G-1, on the transcriptome, cell migration, and invasion in SiHa cells and non-tumorigenic keratinocytes transduced with the HPV16 E6 or E7 oncogenes. Methods: Transcriptome analysis was performed to identify G-1-enriched pathways in SiHa cells. We evaluated cell migration, invasion, and the expression of associated proteins in SiHa, HaCaT-16E6, and HaCaT-16E7 cells using various assays. Results: Transcriptome analysis revealed pathways associated with proliferation/apoptosis (TNF-α signaling, UV radiation response, mitotic spindle formation, G2/M cell cycle, UPR, and IL-6/JAK/STAT), cellular metabolism (oxidative phosphorylation), and cell migration (angiogenesis, EMT, and TGF-α signaling) in SiHa cells. Key differentially expressed genes included PTGS2 (pro/antitumor), FOSL1, TNFRSF9, IL1B, DIO2, and PHLDA1 (antitumor), along with under-expressed genes with pro-tumor effects that may inhibit proliferation. Additionally, DKK1 overexpression suggested inhibition of cell migration. G-1 increased vimentin expression in SiHa cells and reduced it in HaCaT-16E6 and HaCaT-16E7 cells. However, G-1 did not affect α-SMA expression or cell migration in any of the cell lines but increased invasion in HaCaT-16E7 cells. Conclusions: GPER is a promising prognostic marker due to its ability to activate apoptosis and inhibit proliferation without promoting migration/invasion in CC cells. G-1 could potentially be a tool in the treatment of this neoplasia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?