Determinants of willingness to add pollinator beneficial plants to residential yards differ by plant type

Amélie Y Davis,Jessica Stoyko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122852
Abstract:Yards (i.e. residential gardens) can provide suitable food and refuge for a variety of pollinators, but residents' decisions to make such changes to their yards depend on socio-economic characteristics of residents, their lifestyle and life stage, perceived or existing social norms surrounding yard appearance and associated care, as well as yard characteristics such as yard size and characteristics of the plants themselves. In this study, we randomly selected properties in two counties in southwestern Ohio along two gradients: parcel size and parcel valuation (as proxies for urbanization and income gradients, respectively). Two hundred surveys were deployed asking residents about their yard management practices, and their willingness to plant three pollinator beneficial plants (Asclepias syriaca, Echinacea purpurea, and wildflowers (multiple spp.)). One hundred and thirteen surveys were returned (57% response rate). For residents who did not have the aforementioned plants in their yards at the time of the survey, i.e. nearly two-thirds of the respondents, we used random forest models to uncover determinants of willingness to add the native plants shown in the survey in residential yards. Overall, this subpopulation is unwilling to add the plants shown in the survey, especially if they like to keep their backyards neat and tidy. However, differences exist regarding the key explanatory variables of the willingness to plant A. syriaca compared to the other plant types shown in the survey. For A. syriaca property value is not an important explanatory variable but not growing hay and enjoying mowing are associated with stronger willingness to plant A syriaca. For the other native plant types, lower income residents were the least willing to plant them suggesting they might not have the capacity to do so and/or are strongly wanting to adhere to traditional yard aesthetics. The highest income residents were also less willing to add these plants. These findings suggest that approaching homeowners to convert land to native plants should take different tacks for different native plants. For example, to attempt to convince midwestern residents to plant A. syriaca, we suggest focusing on more rural households and properties where hay is not grown. Together, our results indicate that this coupled human-natural system is strongly influenced by a variety of variables that support the "ecology of prestige" theory (Grove et al., 2014) and that the potential for voluntarily erecting pollinator beneficial plantings on private lands where they are currently absent might be rather limited.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?