Validation of Preload Assessment Technologies at Altitude in a Porcine Model of Hemorrhage
Matthew R Baucom,Taylor E Wallen,Adam D Price,Chelsea Caskey,Rebecca M Schuster,Maia P Smith,Thomas C Blakeman,Richard Strilka,Michael D Goodman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.046
Abstract:Introduction: Dynamic preload assessment measures including pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), pleth variability index (PVI), and hypotension prediction index (HPI) have been utilized clinically to guide fluid management decisions in critically ill patients. These values aid in the balance of correcting hypotension while avoiding over-resuscitation leading to respiratory failure and increased mortality. However, these measures have not been previously validated at altitude or in those with temporary abdominal closure (TAC). Methods: Forty-eight female swine (39 ± 2 kg) were separated into eight groups (n = 6) including all combinations of flight versus ground, hemorrhage versus no hemorrhage, and TAC versus no TAC. Flight animals underwent simulated aeromedical evacuation via an altitude chamber at 8000 ft. Hemorrhagic shock was induced via stepwise hemorrhage removing 10% blood volume in 15-min increments to a total blood loss of 40% or a mean arterial pressure of 35 mmHg. Animals were then stepwise transfused with citrated shed blood with 10% volume every 15 min back to full blood volume. PPV, SVV, PVI, and HPI were monitored every 15 min throughout the simulated aeromedical evacuation or ground control. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for serum levels of serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α. Results: Hemorrhage groups demonstrated significant increases in PPV, SVV, PVI, and HPI at each step compared to nonhemorrhage groups. Flight increased PPV (P = 0.004) and SVV (P = 0.003) in hemorrhaged animals. TAC at ground level increased PPV (P < 0.0001), SVV (P = 0.0003), and PVI (P < 0.0001). When TAC was present during flight, PPV (P = 0.004), SVV (P = 0.003), and PVI (P < 0.0001) values were decreased suggesting a dependent effect between altitude and TAC. There were no significant differences in serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, or TNF-α concentration between injury groups. Conclusions: Based on our study, PPV and SVV are increased during flight and in the presence of TAC. Pleth variability index is slightly increased with TAC at ground level. Hypotension prediction index demonstrated no significant changes regardless of altitude or TAC status, however this measure was less reliable once the resuscitation phase was initiated. Pleth variability index may be the most useful predictor of preload during aeromedical evacuation as it is a noninvasive modality.