Comparison of cyclosporine and tacrolimus after liver transplantation for primary biliary cholangitis: A propensity score-matched intention-to-treat registry study

Fredrik Åberg,Ville Sallinen,Samuli Tuominen,Ilkka Helanterä,Arno Nordin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.010
2024-10-12
Abstract:The optimal calcineurin inhibitor after liver transplantation (LT) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) remains debated. We compared tacrolimus with cyclosporine in a propensity score-matched intention-to-treat analysis from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We included adults with PBC who underwent primary LT from 1995 to 2022. Patients with initial cyclosporine treatment were 1:3 matched with those with initial tacrolimus treatment, ensuring exact calendar-period match. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival. After matching, 579 patients with PBC and initial cyclosporine and 1348 with tacrolimus were well balanced for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 11.1 years, 1044 (54%) deaths and 124 (6%) re-LTs occurred. In the overall matched sample, no significant survival difference emerged between cyclosporine and tacrolimus. However, tacrolimus conferred a survival advantage in some secondary analysis, such as LT after year 2000 and women, and in a 6-month landmark analysis excluding early postoperative events and calcineurin inhibitor switches. Cyclosporine did not reduce graft loss from PBC recurrence or affect laboratory markers of recurrence. In conclusion, we found no benefit of starting immunosuppression with cyclosporine after LT for PBC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?