Pressor effects of the tail-cuff method in awake normotensive and hypertensive rats.

R. Buñag
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5555/URI:PII:002221437190103X
1971-10-01
Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Abstract Blood pressure standards established previously by using the tail-cuff method in awake rats usually include the cardiovascular effects of heating and restraint. To study the influence of these extraneous factors, arterial pressures were measured in unanesthetized normotensive and hypertensive rats with chronically implanted aortic catheters. When both tail-cuff and aortic pressures were recorded, rats had to be heated and restrained, and average aortic pressures were all high. But when aortic pressures were recorded alone, rats were neither heated nor restrained because the tail-cuff method was not used and consequently all average aortic pressures were low. These data suggest that the tail-cuff method by itself produces significant pressor effects. Rats with a clipped renal artery could invariably be classified as hypertensive when the tail-cuff method was used to measure pressure, but when tail-cuff measurements were omitted, aortic pressures in more than half of them were within normotensive range. However, in rats with spontaneous hypertension, aortic pressures remained consistently elevated even when tail-cuff determinations were not made.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?