A generalised farmer behaviour model for adoption of environmental measures
Cathal O'Donoghue,Mary Ryan,Denisa Sologon,Niall McLoughlin,Amar Daxini,Karen Daly
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141631
IF: 11.1
2024-03-27
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:Improving the relationship between agricultural activities and the environment is a major challenge, with an increasing focus on the threat to water quality as a result of agricultural intensification (Rockström et al., 2017). Both the factors and pathways of influence of loss of nutrients, sediments and pesticides to water (Blackstock et al., 2010) and the appropriate farm-level mitigating measures are highly complex (Collins et al., 2016; Kanter et al., 2020). The process of providing advice and enabling behavioural change is thus very challenging (Piñeiro et al., 2020; Pannell and Claassen, 2020), imposing significant analytical requirements to support 'real-life' behavioural changes (Wang et al., 2023). Additionally, while much of the scientific adoption literature focuses on the adoption of single measures (e.g. Daxini et al., 2018), in reality, complex environmental solutions increasingly require the implementation of portfolios of measures (Cullen et al., forthcoming), that not only improve water quality, but have wider environmental benefits supporting integrated farm management (Takahashi et al., 2019). There is also a growing urgency surrounding the requirement for 'business intelligence' to support technology transfer, however, undertaking surveys to inform these requirements is a slow and costly process. This paper proposes a more immediate approach by developing a generalised framework that could be scaled-up to identify the behavioural drivers of adoption of multiple (rather than individual) pro-environmental farm measures. Agricultural production has intensified to meet global food security goals, leading to increased nutrient inputs and considerable gains in output (Tama et al., 2021), while also negatively impacting the natural environment (Wagena and Easton, 2018). Despite improvements, approximately one-third of surface-water bodies continue to fall short of 'good' status required by the EU Water Framework Directive (EEA, 2021). To mitigate against nutrient losses, farmers can use Nutrient Management Planning (NMP) to apply nutrients only where they are most needed and will be most efficiently utilised (Plunkett, 2012). However, the adoption of NMP practices has been disappointingly low, despite clear 'win-win' benefits in relation to resource use optimisation, with consequent benefits for the environment and for farm costs (Brown et al., 2019). Studies investigating the factors contributing to the lower-than-expected uptake of NMP often incorporate theoretical frameworks from social psychology (Adnan et al., 2017). Some studies explicitly focus on behavioural drivers influencing NMP adoption (e.g. Daxini et al., 2018). Other behavioural studies take a broader approach by focusing on the implementation of overarching systems, such as conservation agriculture (Tama et al., 2021), or the mitigation of diffuse pollution (Wang et al., 2019). Numerous studies that examine behaviour to explain farmer intentions to adopt measures examine single measures e.g. riparian zone management (Buday and Armstrong, 2022), improved natural grassland (Borges et al., 2014), or mixed cropping (Bonke and Musshoff, 2020). While Waqas et al. (2020) highlight the limitations of investigating the impact of individual rather than multiple NMP practices on soil organic carbon, studies that explicitly examine multiple measures are limited. Wauters et al. (2010) consider the adoption of multiple soil conservation practices in Belgium, namely the use of cover crops, reduced tillage and buffer strips. While these measures individually provide multiple environmental benefits, (impacting positively on greenhouse gas mitigation, water quality and biodiversity), their environmental impact may be augmented when applied collectively. However, to our knowledge, there are no papers that explore the behavioural drivers of multiple pro-environmental measures. In this paper a behavioural methodology is applied to explore the capacity of a generalised model to understand farmers' intentions to adopt multiple, rather than individual measures. This study contributes not only to the academic literature but also provides valuable information for policymakers and practitioners to target the most effective drivers of behavioural change to achieve accelerated adoption of farm measures. This section continues by describing the Irish context. In investigating the adoption of NMP measures, Ireland presents an interesting country case-study country in which pasture-based livestock agriculture is the major land use. NMP is a key advisory tool to reduce both input costs and negative environmental impacts. Despite improvements in the 1990s, successive Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports identify agriculture as a significant pressure on water quality (EPA, 2023). Of interest additionally, is that Ireland has a dedicated water quality advisory service that operates in are -Abstract Truncated-
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental